107 points

Been hearing on the radio all kinds of Comcast ads like “we’ve raised our internet speeds for free!” I knew there was something else at play.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I’m loving my t mobile 5g gateway in my area. No packet loss, ping around 50, and my last game download held over 200Mbps the entire time for a flat rate of $30 a month. Works a lot better than the cable net I had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What’s the data cap?

For shit Comcast it is 1TB which is ridiculously low.

Then they also completely lie to your face about your metrics to make it look like you are always constantly almost at the 1TB cap.

My mom in America just had xfinity installed last fall at her house. She barely uses the internet besides web shopping, articles, and some Netflix. Every month she was somehow at 950-980GB. New WiFi password so there isn’t an intrusion, her computer was fine, there is no way she is using that much. Comcast just lies to your face to higher data caps. Data caps for internet should be illegal as it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s not a “cap” but beyond 1.2TB you will get moved to low priority on your cell tower, so if there’s any network congestion your internet will go to shit.

I’ve never ran into this issue since I live in a sweet spot thats close to a tower and doesn’t have any high occupancy buildings or heavy road traffic that would cause congestion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Iirc tmo has 2 tiers. One with a smallish cap and one that throttles based on tower capacity when you hit something like 30 or 50tb. I had the 30 day trial and I’ve considered getting it as a backup to our cable internet, I’ve held off because most of the time if the cable is out, it’s a bigger issue like a power outage that also eventually takes down the towers as well, plus I think where we are there is only one tower that we connect to and when it goes down we switch to another much further away with barely any signal.

I have spectrum gigabit down and they cap us at like 35 up. I’m watching and waiting while 3 companies aside from spectrum and att rollout fiber all over town. I’m hoping that eventually they get to us. We live in the outskirts and one of the companies expanded south from north of us so I have reason to hope they get to us eventually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree; data caps should not be a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I also have T-Mobile 5G. I once had the luxury of being able to buy fiber 1G up/down before I moved to a new area and that was the absolute best of any ISP I’ve ever had. Now my only real option with a physical connection is Xfinity copper that was offering 200mbps down 10 mbps up for just $50/mo* terms and conditions apply. $50 is the promotional price for this offer. After one year this offer will expire. Then every year id have to field a call from their promotional dept. offering a 100mbps increase to my speeds for just $5 more per month rather than losing the promotional price and the bill costing $80 with no increase. The straw that broke the camel’s back was an attempt to charge an extra $5 a month for using autopay with a debit card. I could save that fee by switching to using my bank’s routing number. So I told Comcast 🖕and switched.

My favorite story though is when an Xfinity rep called me to ask about who provides my cell phone service. When I told them that i use Mint mobile and pay $20/mo for 20GB of data or whatever it was at the time, they just straight up told me, “Oh gotcha. Yeah, we can’t compete at that price.” Then hung up 😂

My only real gripe with T-Mobile so far is that if your price is accurate, then I’m paying an extra $15/mo just based on location despite there being no physical difference in our connection. Also i don’t like that I’m unable to do any port forwarding on T-Mobile so it prevents me from running my Jellyfin server and PiHole from home and being able to use it anywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m “locked in” at t-mo on price and also have my cell phone with t-mobile. If you aren’t on a cell phone plan with them I think they were charging $50 a month. I don’t know how long they were offering the $30 deal. I swapped to them pretty early on them having it.

As for your port forwarding issue, t mobiles gateway may not offer that, but it has an ethernet port. Why don’t you plug your own wifi router into that and set up port forwarding there and then just treat the gateway as a modem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think tailscale (headscale for foss) requires pf. I could be remembering wrong, so don’t hold me to it, but worth a look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Threads like this make me cherish my symmetrical gigabit fiber connection all the more.

I hear we’ll be getting 2 gigabit in the near future, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s all well and good, but I have no need for gigabit. Online games use very little (heck, starcraft worked great on dial up), and streaming only takes 15Mb most of the time. I’m only paying $30 a month. For that, I’m fine with doing something else for a while during the rare occasion I’m downloading some huge pc game or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’d argue that the main driver for all of this is the increased rollout of fiber. Companies like AT&T started broadly rolling out gigabit plans for what people were paying for sub 50 megabit cable plans. And the lines handled neighborhood network congestion better.

Comcast has to figure out how to be competitive, or they are going to get their asses handed to them.

AT&T and Comcast are both terrible companies with horrible customer service, but fiber is always going to be better than copper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I was hoping Starlink would also push traditional providers to be better, but it hasn’t gotten its shit together well enough yet to be a real threat. Should have known better than to think Musk would be helpful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Except fragility

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If only wire shielding and stress relief was a thing that existed…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My internet has been much more reliable since I moved to fiber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nah, they’ve been doing that for years. In the two years since I first got my service at my house I went from 200gig to 800gig with no price increase. It’s p SOP these days when network upgrades take place in your area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

800gig? Can I come live with you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

500kbs upload and 1gb cap -comcast

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Fuck that, instead of making them increase their imaginary “up to” numbers, make them advertise contractually guaranteed minimums. Id rather have a 25 mb minimum over a 100 mb maximum that usually sits around 8 mb.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

When I bought internet services and colocated with major carriers every contract came with a Quality of Service rider that stipulated guaranteed quality and quantity of service. If my metrics fell below those minimums I had recourse. But, I could not extend that to my customers because they were using a shared resource I was providing. In general, though, I agree that there should be a QOS with every user connection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

and 20Mbps for upload

What we actually care about.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

100mbps symmetric should be minimum standard. 100mbps down with 10mbps up is worse than remote islands with mud huts. Seriously, I was on a Pacific island that looked like what an after hurricane photo op does, and they had direct access to the fiber cables. So gigabit symmetric internet ONTs glued to the side of huts for a few bucks a month.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

100Mb/s is still pretty abysmal.

permalink
report
reply
51 points
*

A 4x increase for download and a 7x increase requirment for upload.

That’s a pretty solid improvement, honestly. They also have plans on whne to increase it to 1Gbps down/500Mbps up, so it seems like they are taking it seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

It’s long overdue and gigabit should be standard

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

It is long overdue, as the last update was 2015, when a democrat was President. The GOP refused to do it, and it took some time to seat a new FCC head due to Republican obstruction.

Gigabyte is coming, just not yet. This is a fine incremental step.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

my third world country’s internet has a minimum of 100mbps on most internet plans in the cities.

100mbps in the supposed best country in the world is shit, no matter how higher it is than 2003 standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

lol I’ve never had anything over 12Mb/s. Currently have 8Mb/s, which costs roughly half than what I use to pay for 500kb/s

I would love to have 100Mb/s. Hell even half that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Satellite?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s interesting. I have a remote place (not where I live) in the least populated, podunkest county in the state (which is saying something). And we were still able to get fibre and 50Mbps out there (and it could be higher, but not really worth the extra money since it’s rarely used).

Still within a couple hours of a big city, though. Guessing you’re further away than that, or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The 500kbps was 15 minutes outside of a metro area of 2.5 million lol

It was decades of CenturyLink making sure no one else moved in on their turf.

Where I’m at now the fiber is a couple of miles away and no cable, but 8Mbps feels lightning fast after CenturyLink lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s enough to watch exactly one 1080p 30fps stream on YouTube and literally nothing else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s why I stream 720p when I can lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

100Mb/s is 800Mbps. This is 25Mbps to 100Mbps so 3.125mb/s to 8.33mb/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Mbps = Mb/s = Megabits per second.

MBps = MB/s = Megabytes per second.

The p is just the /. It’s the capital or lowercase B that makes the difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Shit I found the one person who can actually remember the written difference bit and byte

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
  • 3.125MB/s to 12.5MB/s

He is right though on megabits to megabytes. Internet speed is advertised in bits/s where files and transfer speeds are usually shown in software as megabytes/s

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments