69 points

On one hand, thank god I get to play it on PC.

On the other hand, fuck Microsoft.

On the third hand, fuck Sony, too.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

what third hand

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

looks down.

Oh.

Oh my.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

exclusivity is shit and blatantly anti-consumer

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Counterpoint: I don’t see a point in buying consoles if they have no exclusives

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

a budget gaming pc that requires minimal upkeep or research into picking parts or putting them together

if that isnt a good enough reason, counterpoint: maybe consoles just have no point then

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Consoles are mass produced and (usually) sold at a loss. I don’t see how PCs can compete with that in terms of value.

Additionally, consoles receive better support from both their manufacturers and from large game developers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Consoles are by far the best bang for your buck right now in terms of performance vs cost. A decent GPU alone today costs as much as a PS5/Series X. Unless you need a powerful desktop for other purposes, it’s cheaper to buy a console and a decent laptop separately than it is to build a gaming PC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Short term, sure. But got 12 years of decent gaming out of my last PC that I just replaced in January. I don’t know any consoles that continue to have releases over that sort of timeframe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Idk about that, if you’re aiming for performance similar to what consoles get you can build a PC for pretty cheap

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re not making a counterpoint, you’re making THE point against exclusivity

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That depends on weather you want consoles to exist or not. Personally I think it’s more exciting that we have different consoles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

So, if you’re only buying a console to play that one or two games, they are objectively not a good choice to buy for you. Or if you have multiple consoles just to play all the exclusives, not for any actual feature of the device or cause it does something specific you want (or has accessories others don’t, like VR), same thing. This promotes innovation.

If games weren’t exclusive, you could just buy whatever console fits your use case the best, offers the best performance, or the cheapest for more casual gamers who don’t care about performance who just want to play something every now and then. That’s good for consumers.

So what you said isn’t a counterpoint at all. It’s just your reason for buying them I presume, actually proving they are bad for consumers especially in your case. If they had no exclusives, you’d just play whatever game you want on whatever platform you chose, losing nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The games are the only “actual feature” of any gaming devices. Any superior hardware without software is just a piece of tech demo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

screw all that exclusivity shit

permalink
report
reply
27 points

God forbid they release it everywhere and compete to have the best console that people want to buy

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

but then they would have to compete on hardware

Won’t anybody think of what that costs the poor billionaires?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Lately, PS Plus has felt like a better GamePass than GamePass. That almost certainly wouldn’t be the case if there is further market consolidation.

So I get Microsoft’s angle but ultimately I want to see them both compete for value and monopolies don’t do that. Also we’ve seen what Microsoft do with monopolies…

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Does it feel to you like competition is close between the two consoles without this acquisition?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Not the other person but no. Microsoft really needs more exclusive games to their system. I
Want the three major systems to do well because that means there’s lots of good games to play. But it seems microsoft have forgotten about making good games leading consumers to choose Sony.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Microsoft really needs more exclusive games to their system.

Fuck exclusivity

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think they forgot, but to get the throughput that Sony has takes a lot of studios…that they’re trying to buy right now. I’m not a fan of it, but it’s too hard for someone else to enter the console space, so I don’t see another way for that gap to close.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The PS5 is still difficult to even purchase in the first place, isn’t it?

And if Playstation wanted to make inroads on PC, Microsoft has a leg up in the PC market as well by dent of being Microsoft and making the OS, so Xbox controllers are more plug and play than Playstation ones, they can optimize performance better, etc.

Overall I don’t think Microsoft becoming even more of a monopoly would help anybody but Microsoft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

shortages are largely solved actually

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t see how market consolidation benefits consumers. I’m not sure that I understand the point you are making?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Without something significant to move the needle back toward Microsoft, Sony will be the de facto high-end console manufacturer, which isn’t good for consumers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

So all is just Microsoft and Sony blaming each other of being more anti-competitive

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Well ya, Sony is actively trying to block Microsoft from buying Activision Blizzard.

I also kind find this whole thing funny because Microsoft keeps enough cash on hand to just outright buy Sony without having to liquidate any assets so I’m willing to bet that’ll be the eventual power move

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If the FTC has any credibility at all, or even an illusion of credibility, at least that would be too big an acquisition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

About 14 billion short at current. Who know what a buyout would actual take beyond the regulatory requirements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well if the Activision Blizzard falls through then there’s your extra cash lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

governments would never allow that, and im sure Microsoft is aware that they would never allow that

permalink
report
parent
reply

Gaming

!gaming@beehaw.org

Create post

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments