54 points

Israel already did their strike, and it actually had casualties!

Iran’s strike was the symbolic one.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

I honestly thought this was The Onion just based on the headline alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s like we live in two different realities.

One for the US and Israel

And another for the rest of the world

permalink
report
parent
reply

These people are fucking nuts.

Where do I buy shoes like the headline picture? I need these stat!

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I got confused, clicked your link and was like: Yeah…the guy is fuckin craycray…but what shoes??

So maybe look up Iranian surplus? Or look to see who manufactures them? Maybe make friends with some people in Iran, in the military, and see how much of a bribe it would take to have some sent in your size?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Arsène is most likely referring to the Israeli flag printed on the bottom, meaning that every step you take is a step on the Israeli flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

facepalm

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The imagery that comes to mind is a special israeli kid facing a football goal, ball at his feet. Behind the kid with the ball is an american, cheering him on and encouraging him. Across from them is an iranian goalkeeper.

The israeli kicks the ball, the american cheers and praises as the ball slowly rolls across the grass. The iranian goalkeeper dives dramatically in the wrong direction, allowing the ball to roll in.

The american raises the drooling israeli child onto his shoulders while the stadium erupts into praise and celebration of the kid’s accomplishment.

permalink
report
reply
-22 points
*

It seems like they all behave like spoiled teenage boys

I haven’t been living for long but is this because of patriarchy or simply gender agnostic idiocy?

Whose brilliant idea was eye for an eye again?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

What does gender have to do with this!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

Patriarchy is quick to war and values physical aggression. If we were ruled by matriarchy the wars would be sparse and pragmatic. No dick measuring contests on geopolitical arena.

You can disagree of course but you must surely notice that men are more prone to aggression and seek physical fights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Misandry is gross, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think you’re ignoring all the bloodthirsty queens who’ve ruled throughout the ages. Aggression and conflict is a human issue, not a male one.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3463364

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I should hope a matriarchal society would also resort to violence in response to Israel’s violence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments