Google warns users of these apps that their experience may deteriorate soon. They may “experience buffering issues” or see errors such as “the following content is not available on this app” when trying to watch videos.

Similar to Google Search, ads have become insufferable for many users of the service. There are too many of them, they may break the viewing experience, and they may show inappropriate content.

YouTube Premium is expensive. What weights more for some users is that its functionality is severely limited when compared to third-party apps.

The cat and mouse game continues.

For those looking to avoid ads or improve privacy, here are some options for free, open source, privacy-friendly frontends to YouTube without advertisements:

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/frontends/#youtube

76 points

You know, they’d probably get a tenfold increase of Premium subscribers if they just, I don’t know, dropped the prices a smidge and had better regional pricing. Not everyone can or will subscribe, but Google is only making this more difficult for themselves by making it such an expensive service.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I was a happy subscriber when I was paying $15/mo for a family plan for 6 people. I was grandfathered into a low rate for being an early adopter of Google Play Music All Access.

Then they decided that grandfathered plans no longer applied and wanted me to start paying $23/mo, a more than 50% increase, so I canceled. I switched to Spotify for the music, where I pay less, and just watch less YouTube since the ads are ridiculous.

If they kept it at $15/mo, I’d still be a subscriber. If they sold just ad-free YouTube for like $3/mo, I’d consider subscribing to that and keeping my Spotify subscription.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It costs $23/mo for fucking YouTube? And to get the same experience you get with a free browser add-on? Fuck all of that. Absolutely not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yep. Their excuse is that you also get YouTube music out of it, but there is no option to buy them separately.

At this point I have no interest in moving away from Spotify, so Google’s gonna have to play ball if they want to get me back. It’s sad, too, when it seems like every other YouTube link I visit from my phone brings up a prompt begging me to subscribe again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

… No. It’s $15 a month unless you sign up every single person in your family. It still boggles my mind how people have grown used to the idea of using services for free. The internet isn’t free. Everything costs money, even Lemmy. YouTube has server costs. Employee costs. And dare I say it, profit margins because they’re a business.

You need to pay for services you use. I’m exhausted with online entitlement that it all should be free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I was about to pay for it when they doubled the cost. No joke I told my wife I was going to start paying since we watch it all the time. The next week they doubled the cost. It irritated me. Not because I couldn’t afford it but because they added no value with the increase. Nothing changed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I believe there’s a sort of death-loop phenom taking place here. The enshitification, you know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How much you think the salaries of the pencil pushers are, the ones who get paid for little else but squeezing every single possible cent out of the supply/demand curve? The corporate greedsters, err the “revenue maximizers”.

Startup founders are told:

Raise your prices. You’ll triple them and only lose 10% of your customers, and it will be your worst 10% of customers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Lol good luck Google. No way im watching YouTube with ads.

permalink
report
reply
-58 points

Then don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Yeah let me fork over my rapidly disappearing regular people money for a service which used to be free, whose price will only keep going up, and whose features will only keep disappearing to be locked behind a higher tier of paid subscription, thus giving me less and less, for more and more payment. You meet me over there. Let me just grab my little red wig and honk my nose a few times first and I’ll be right over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

The service was never fucking free you goober it always had ads. Since the moment it expanded beyond a couple dozen 240p videos, it had ads. You know what they did though? Tried to pay the people you watch so they could make a living giving you content. But yes throw a fucking tantrum that you have to pay the website so they can stay running and pay the people so they can earn that “regular people money” you ignorant fuckwit. YouTube still, to this day, doesn’t make a profit and still comes at an expense to Google/Alphabet.

You’ve been comfortable in that red wig and nose for way too long already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Youtube Premium offers a fraction of the benefits of something like Newpipe.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Does it even have content you can only see with Premium like Red did?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Does it even pay the people you watch? No… wait… it just freeloads off YouTube by piping that content to their site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s multiple issues with this but a lot of them come down to: it’s Google.

They will charge. They have heaps of money, they will enzhittify. They will kill and recommend a new less capable app.

They’re Google and I’m moving away from them hard.

I do use YT a lot, and for now I pay. But give me a little time and that won’t be as true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But that doesn’t get rid of the ads, it just get rid of some. Sponsorblock would still be needed. Why pay a huge amount for something ineffective?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If it was fairly priced then maybe, but as of now yt premium just isn’t a good opntion

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

$15 a month is on par with other subscriptions, part of that money goes to the people you watch so they can get paid for what they do, I don’t see what’s unfair about this pricing. Yes, the features they give are lackluster and could easily be done by third party apps before they killed them but I pay for premium so the people who do YouTube as a job can make a living.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did you really come in here with a mini youtube premium go back to reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

By now just paying for adblocking alone wouldn’t cut it, I have also grown accustomed to YouTube sponsorblock in my client.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Indeed, paying for YouTube would still result in loads of advertisements. So it’s pretty crazy that Google (and various people) are saying you need to pay because you’d just pay and still see loads of ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s not just the ads either. Automatically skipping interaction reminders, zelf promotion and non-music parts is such an improved experience that it’s just too painful to go back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

I said the same thing for Reddit before the third-party apps crackdown; instead of cracking down on users who just want a better experience, they could allow third-party apps to be officially used if you have a paid/Premium subscription?

That way Google gets paid, and the users who enjoy their third-party apps can keep using them without worrying about them suddenly breaking.

That doesn’t solve the privacy issue which is a good reason why people use these, but at least it partly solves the monetary issue.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It would only work if it was still a massive privacy invasion. They either feed you ads or sell your data, they’re not going to offer a service that can’t at least do one of those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It’s ok google, we have just as many engineers across the world that hate you and your ads and want to watch videos without your predatory pricing.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Indeed. However, they have that web DRM thing in their back pocket. The more we resist (as we should) their efforts to shut ad circumvention down, the more they’ll look at web DRM I’m sure. And they’ll have all large media outlets with them when they load that ball into the cannon.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 530K

    Comments