8 points

This is me being pedantic, but here goes: best work ever meaning this is as good as it gets, it’s all down hill from here?

I know they mean best work yet but c’mon man, say what you mean.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Pedant!! Pedant alert!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The studio would like to remind everyone that a group of Pedants is called a “Phlegm”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A group of redundants is called a redundants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Okay Larian, let’s maybe not get ahead of yourselves here. Your games have been decent to good so far, but you cannot predict the future like that and expect it to actually happen. A lot can happen in the like 7 years it will probably take you to develop your next game.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Slightly more context:

" “I don’t know if we’re going to pull it off,” he wrote, “but looking at our narrative, visual and gameplay plans, I think what we’re working on now will be our best work ever.” "

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

As a creative person myself, I think anyone that thinks the thing they are making is “their best one ever,” I think they either have a massive ego bubble waiting to pop, or theyre planning on stopping their creative projects soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Well, you might reconsider whether thinking like that actually makes the world much less fun and tolerable to live in than not. No reason to be so cynical and self-centered, friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

They reached a huge audience with bg3, seems like a mistake to act like they’re a too good to follow up on it. No one except hardcore rpg fans ever cared about Larian’s IPs

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They didn’t make more Bg3 because the teams heart wasn’t in it. They didn’t have the drive. You can mourn the departure all you like, but don’t put words in their mouth. They’ve spoken on the decision, go read about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’ve met more many people who have played divinity original sin 2 than the latest call of duty. If someone makes a good game, people play it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Confirmation bias. A better judge would be actual player counts from Steam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I believe the problem is that WOTC was incredibly hard to work with. They should have a lot more freedom with their own IP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hasbro is the core problem. Trying to squeeze WOTC for every penny

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

That’s a huge shame. I found their IPs to be terribly boring and unimaginative compared to bg3. They aren’t that good at world building on their own imo.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I loved DOS:2 so I respectfully disagree with you. I’d love to see a DOS:3 with full voice acting and cinematics like they did in BG3.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Divinity 2 was amazing, although I got really bored when it came to Act 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Act 3 was a slog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

“We’re making something new but it’s boring and will suck.” said no one ever.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

“We’re making something new and don’t have high hopes for it. Just don’t even bother”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We’re going for a cross between spore and star field.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Anyway, here’s our new game Wonderwall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

A quote from Vincke at the end of the post only stokes the excitement further. “I don’t know if we’re going to pull it off,” he wrote

This is so refreshing. A studio with big Ws that still goes balls out and takes risks. You love to see it. Take notes, gaming studios. This is how you make fun games.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

People didn’t really like it when CD Projekt Red did that with Cyberpunk, and this is a pretty close mirror image of that…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The main problem with that one was a hypetrain without brakes that crashed into a solid wall of broken promises

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

People don’t like that cyberpunk was/is graphically unoptimized. If your computer can run it the game’s fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re saying this like the reason everyone was pissed off about cyberpunk was because of anything other than it not being finished. STILL.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 76K

    Comments

Community moderators