142 points

What a wonderful rabbit hole to go down. My takeaways are it could possibly be used for knitting, but traditional spool knitting that the Grandma uses in the video doesn’t show up in history until the 1500s. If the Romans did use it for gloves then knitting has been around much longer than we have evidence of or they were using a different method with the dodecahedron.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

I think I also read these were usually found with treasures and with minimal or no wear, so there isn’t any evidence they were used for anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

The best suggested explanation IMO is that it’s a way for blacksmiths to demonstrate their skill.

“lol stupid scientists don’t know what knitting is” I would file under “actively anti-intellectual”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

So it’s the ancient Roman blacksmith’s version of Benchy. Got it

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Kinda like the little nib on top of old saw blades. It doesn’t really do anything, but if they can make that complex little nib, then they can probably make pretty decent sawblades too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Iirc it was only found in northern areas. Can’t see demonstrations of skill being only there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

Except that’s probably not what they’re for, I saw a video recently (I think it was this one) that went into detail about the reasons why it doesn’t make much sense for these to be a knitting tool.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

There’s a lesson here about the differences between history and a good historical narrative, but that’s the lesson of most history and no one ever listens to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There’s a lesson here about the differences between history and a good historical narrative, but that’s the lesson of most history and no one ever listens to it.

There’s a lesson here about the differences between history and a good historical narrative, but that’s the lesson of most history and no one ever listens to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think there’s a lesson here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

First and foremost: knitting wasn’t invented until centuries later and didn’t appear in Europe until about the 14th century.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hope this is the next episode of hardcore history. I could use 30 hours of Dan Carlin context on knitting…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not to yuck your Yum, but I think some people are far too into knitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Decoding the Unknown (also by Simon Whistler) did a video on these as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What’s up with the narrator? He’s got like 20 big channels he reads for. Are the channels connected and run by the same group, or does he host for a bunch of independent channels?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think he’s just snowballed in popularity over the years because he’s good at reading these scripts in a way that sounds both smart and fun. The different channels focus on different styles and subject areas, letting you pick and choose what kind of thing you’re interested in.

I rather like his “Decoding the Unknown” channel, where he gets scripts debunking various paranormal or otherwise mysterious events and he reads them for the first time as it’s being recorded, taking lots of opportunities to interject his own theories and speculation and just generally rag on the concept of the paranormal as he goes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m pretty sure he maintains the YT channels themselves, but he has a host of writers who write his scripts

The two Channels / Podcasts I follow are Decoding the Unknown (deep dives into unsolved mysteries and paranormal debunks) and the Casual Criminalist (true crime)

For both, he does a cold read, and often interjects with his own stories and theories

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

maybe its for measuring how much pasta you need to boil

permalink
report
reply
18 points

There’s no horse on it, silly!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I understood that reference

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tell me please.

I’m missing a reference and it itches my brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

how much pasta you need to knit a toga or some shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Maybe it is a knitting-pastaing-horsing multitool

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

That’s a d12. Clearly, the Romans were using it to play D&D.

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

I cast fear on Julius Caesar!

Uh oh, Julius Ceasar’s only path is through most of the members of Senate. Each member gets one attack of opportunity.

Go ahead and roll 23 dodecahedrons for hits! Brutus also gets advantage for backstab.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Last time one of these threads popped up, I saw someone suggest that it might have been a holder for some of those bottles with pointed bottoms the Romans had, don’t remember the name. I’m not sure if this is a hypothesis with any level of acceptance, but it feels like it could be plausible just from looking at the thing, having different sized holes would allow different sizes of bottle to fit, and you’d want feet for each possible side that it could be resting on, which would explain the prongs.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

These devices are rather small and most amphora seem to be much larger. The shape of amphora helped with shipping, so they were typucally larger than a device that can fit in your hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m not sure if this is a hypothesis with any level of acceptance

Unless an actual record is found describing what they were used for, it’s all just guesses anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

those bottles with pointed bottoms the Romans had, don’t remember the name.

Amphora

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments