80 points

Not a scientific observation, but the zoo I used to work at often planted medicinal plants in primate enclosures because they use them. I think this has been common in zoos for a long while.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Goats know. Sheep know. Equines know. If I make sure the farm animals have access to different flora around the pastures they won’t get ill. It’s nice following the animals around and finding out what they eat, and other ways they use plants. The more time I spend with animals the more I think it’s us humans being the dumb ones.

On that note, watching what great apes do in their natural habitat might teach us a few things about plants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

In the case of wild primates I would believe they know as we would use the word. For Goats, Sheep, Or Equines, I have to imagine its closer to how we get cravings for foods sometimes, because we have some sort of nutrient deficiency that food would correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That would lead into philosophical discussions as to what knowledge means. I do see that we have the tendency of assuming others have less agency or are less aware of their actions than us. We do that as individuals and as a species, so I tend to be careful. I also wish I had useful food cravings, mine don’t tend to be too healthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Humans don’t intrinsically know what to eat to for nutrient deficiencies, that’s a learned behavior based on finding out what the symptoms of a given deficiency are, and learning which foods have the necessary nutrients.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

One seen doing it spontaneously in nature might be more significant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Nah, I’ve never been in the monkey house chewing ginger roots, they know this stuff, or work it out, not sure which really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

I don’t get it. I highly doubt zookeepers tend to pick medicinal plants from the habitats in lieu of popping a painkiller. Otherwise how would using a shovel teach a monkey to use plants to treat a scratch for example?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who is using medicinal plants from the ape enclosure in a zoo setting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t mean it that literally. I mean just observing swaths of people putting straws into drinks, putting ointments on scrapes, etc might make them extrapolate and try similar actions using what’s available to them.

It’s not much of a reach for a primate seeing a human manipulate and dig with a shovel, and use that as inspiration to manipulate a bamboo shoot to scratch their own back.

We homosapiens spent 180,000 ish years wandering around in the dirt like idiots before it occurred to some of us that we could grow food in one place, thus beginning the path to civilization. Even we need examples to extrapolate from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

he cares for his health more than I do for mine.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Do you need a leaf or some sap?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I am willing to offer some of my hot leaf water.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You and the Heart of Gold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Monke smart

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Monke smarter than us. Monke don’t fuck up entire planet for more profit

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Return to Monke

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They would, given the chance.

https://www.treehugger.com/animals-that-are-bad-for-the-environment-4869350

Elephants can cause deforestation. And I’m sure everyone is familiar with invasive plants taking over an area and turning it into a monoculture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s also not like most humans are doing jackshit to cause climate change, it’s caused by the few percent of richest people on earth.

Humans are inherently smart and kind and generous and whatnot, specific people are devoid of empathy and are merrily abusing everyone else for profit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“I’m sure everyone is familiar with invasive plants taking over an area and turning it into a monoculture”

They’re “invasive” because humans brought them into new ecosystems where they shouldn’t be in the first place. Plants (and animals) just don’t just go around invading other ecosystems afaik.

Also, elephants taking down trees, they’re (mostly) supposed to do that. It plays a vital role in the ecosystem too. Elephants taking down large trees makes it easier for smaller plants to grow, making the ecosystem more diverse. Also these trees and the elephants have co-evolved for centuries, so I they know how to live with eachother and can probably do that for years to come.

Also, that’s besides the point. Other animals aren’t as conscious as us. We are not just following instincts the same way as them. We know stuff we’re doing is destroying the planet, yet we continue because $$$

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This monke also got sweet ass goatee

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

+10 to charisma

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Given enough time, other species may evolve and perhaps teach us a thing or two about being better civilized beings.

My money is on the octopi people.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

They don’t live long enough, sadly. If they did, they could easily be the dominant species. Many octopus species have been shown to have the intelligence of a 7 year old. Besides the fact that it’s a form of intelligence that evolved completely separate from ours (our last common ancestors didn’t have a brain), octopi only live about 3-4 years. Think about that for a moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Many octopus species have been shown to have the intelligence of a 7 year old

So about as smart of some former presidents. Awesome!

Besides the fact that it’s a form of intelligence that evolved completely separate from ours

Precisely what I was thinking about when I said that in jest. But seriously, they are incredible creatures!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They don’t live long enough, sadly. If they did, they could easily be the dominant species.

The problem is not how long they live but that they don’t take care of the offspring, so every octopus need to learn everything from scratch again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You may want to read Adrian Tchaikovsky’s Children of Ruin (after Children of Time). If you haven’t already…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

We’re going on an adventure!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

shudder

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Adrian Tchaikovsky’s Children of Ruin

haha! awesome! I haven’t read it, but having looked up the plot, I’m now interested. 🙃

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Read Children of Time first, but the whole series is good. Basically anything he writes is good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Resident Alien supports your theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We started episode one, got interrupted, and never finished! Ack! Thanks for the reminder!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The kids can’t act for shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

if only there were humans who wrote books about how to structure society such that things don’t suck

Say maybe some german dude with a big beard

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s actually curious how does one arrive at the idea of using plants like that in the first place, when they are an early human or an orangutan. Probably at first, they just applied random plant matter to cover up the wound, or chewed plant matter to cool it down (it will keep moisture for longer than water). And then noticed that some plants are actually more effective at that.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I assume you meant to write whether instead of when.

So this is pure speculation, I would guess this kind of behavior will date back to the last common ancestor. Great apes and humans split somewhere between 5 and 23 million years ago. We haven’t actually found any fossils of this animal, hence the big time range. Anyway at the time of the split, neither humans or great apes existed. We have evolved alongside each other to what we are today. This makes me feel that use of medicinal plants is a learned behavior dating back millions of years.

As to the exact mechanism to learn this I would speculate that it comes for eating plants. It is very likely that the LCA was an omnivore. Say animal eats plant, weirdly animal feals better. After enough time of doing this animal connects the dots and knows a specific plant feels better. After enough generations and resulting increases in intelligence, it is not a big leap to seeing if rubbing a plant on your body makes you feel better.

This could of course come after the LCA. Convergent evolution exists so it seems safe to say convergent learning does too. Until there is evidence to the contrary. Learned behavior from the LCA seems more likely to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not so convinced it’s from a common ancestor, tool use has been observed in a wide variety of animals ranging from birds to octopus, and that common ancestor is unlikely to have used tools. This seems more akin to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments