PROTECT CHILD MARRIAGE -> fuck this guy
LGBTQ IS A GROUP OF PEDOPHILES. PLEASE IGNORE THE LITERAL PEDOPHILIA MY COLLEAGUES AND I ARE DEFENDING.
I disagree. Memes are powerful tools and by denying ourselves the use of popular memes we grant “the enemy” an enormous advantage. Better we acknowledge that the issue is not the meme itself, but how it is used.
But there is an issue with the meme itself. It often associates whiteness (notice how the chad is explicitly a white guy with blonde hair and blue eyes) with being good/right, or physical characteristics associated with ‘stupidity’ (drooling, dented head) with being wrong. The underlying white supremacy & ableism is still there.
And no, we shouldn’t compromise on our values to use popular memes.
I dunno, I see your point but does the guy on the left really have a dented head? I thought those were forehead lines from emotional agitation. Also, where is the drool? I only see tears. I don’t really see the inherent ableism, as much as I see a negative representation things like lack of emotional regulation, “neckbeardyness,” etc. I agree moreso on the whiteness and general tidyness of the chad, and the association of beauty with good and ugliness with bad – I kinda buy your argument there. It is pretty shit that we do that, but I don’t necessarily think it’s wrong for the OP to use this meme template. Ignorant? Maybe.
I feel like you could use similar strategies to decry any meme. For example, the glorification of violence through imagery and use of the word “weapon” in your own meme. Obviously, I’m not going to seriously suggest you’re perpetuating the glorification of violence through your meme, but I kinda think its the same with OPs meme.
Edit: to be clear, all my thoughts on this are entirely from the last 20 min. I assumed you’ve thought more about this subject than me, so I consider myself pretty swayable. But idk, my initial reaction is that we’re looking too far into a meme.
It is conveyed that the left should not resort to populism and simple imagery such as “wojacks” We prefer referring to nuanced 500 page essays to convey our arguments so that anyone without sufficient vocabulary and/or time will remain excluded from our circles.
Thesaurus > Wojack.
she’s alluding to the fact that these characters — the ‘soyjack’ and ‘gigachad’ — are historically, and still actively are, alt-right charicatures. together with their friends, ‘tradwife’ and ‘doomer (girl)’: they represent misogynistic, racist, antisemitic, and white supremacist tropes.
Must they continue to do so? On their own they are nothing but stand-ins for people or ideologies. If we can reclaim entire slurs, surely we can reclaim these, no?
Just another day as an Backasswardian.
It’s to devalue labor. The larger the workforce the less they can pay. Think of the pictures of kids with coal on their faces in the early 1900s. Appalachia was a full coal economy. Dirt poor, and still feeling the effects today. Regulate labor.
