Around one in six voters say that a guilty verdict in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial will make them less likely to vote for him, according to a new poll.

87 points

Only 1 in 6 voters would change their mind about a convicted fraudster becoming the most powerful person in the country? And only after ANOTHER guilty verdict?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

And they’re probably lying too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hmm, did the poll mention whether Sudan Collins was part of the one in six?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Well, it won’t change my mind about voting for Biden either way. There’s no way I will vote for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Technically, this would be the first guilty verdict.

The other verdicts were in civil court, so “liable”, not “guilty”. ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I still like to pepper in “guilty” every once in a while. Sometimes a little Trumpette will bite and try to correct it to “liable”. I then confirm that they knowingly support someone liable for sexual assault and defend the distinction as if it makes it better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not just sexual assault, the judge later corrected that to rape.

“Adjuducated Rapist Donald Trump”. ;)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/07/donald-trump-rape-language-e-jean-carroll

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think that includes the voters who won’t vote for him regardless. Like me. Whatever the jury finds, I’m not going to vote for Donald Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I mean, it certainly hasn’t changed my mind: I was never going to vote for him in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

1/6 voters is enough to swing it. The Texas split was 50-45. 1/6 is about 15%. .85*50=42.5 so (going with the wild assumption that Texas would have split along the same divide) if 1 in every 6 Trump supporters stay home just in Texas because of this it’s the entire election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, there’s a lot more than 6 people, right? This would mean 2 people at the very least. My math may be off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, one in two weren’t going to vote for him anyways so it’s closer to effectively being one in three which lines up pretty well with the observation that 70% (about 35% on either side) of the electorate are uninformed voters who just vote based on party and don’t really care who the candidate is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

70% (about 35% on either side) of the electorate are uninformed voters who just vote based on party and don’t really care

Now, when people vote to try and elect an absolute wankglaze to office, we can be sure that they’re voting for their favorite sports team and will never stop.

But people voting for the least-worse option, how do we know they’re voting for teams and not voting in a marginally-less-horrific platform after careful consideration and a bit of a cry?

I have one team I’ll never vote for because they just keep proving themselves dicks, but I do like to consider the options while I can still convince myself there is a choice between what’s left after that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Wow you can read!

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

I am so jealous of someone who didn’t realize Trump was a complete asshole until now.

Imagine how peaceful their lives are. I bet it feels like walking through thick, warm clouds. You can vaguely see shapes and hear muffled sounds but none of it is important enough to trouble yourself about.

Just a fuzzy, happy brain, floating through the universe.

So jealous.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

These kinds of stupid people are usually uneducated and have shit jobs, have failed relationships and marriages, have been disowned by their children and so on.

Don’t be jealous. Ignorance isn’t always as blissful as people make it seem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They are products of their material conditions, manipulated into being the army of ignorance that protects the Capitalist status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Never be jealous of idiocy. It’s literally like watching Idiocracy and being like oh man wouldn’t that be so great,…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

GO AWAY!! BATIN!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Envious*

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Well let’s see if they’re as good as their word.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Narrator: they aren’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Goddamn, people in this country are fucking stupid.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

look at education, nutrition, news fabrication, religious indoctrination, broken families, etc, i dont really blame the masses themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I 100% blame them. It’s called critical thinking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How is this the straw that breaks the camel’s back?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 429K

    Comments