74 points

You know the algorithm shows you to fewer people if you swipe right on everyone

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Yeah for these algorithms you want to show better signals. Choose a sex/age range your not interested in and just swipe left while watching a movie.

Your algorithmic pickiness will improve tremendously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

But they swipe left on a whole… 3.5% of people! Super picky, that’s probably why

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

if swiping right on 14k people got him 14 matches and no dates, i can only imagine the hopelessness of trying to be picky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The thing is, you have no idea how many people saw it. If 50 people saw it and he got 14 matches, that’s actually pretty good! Imagine if he’d been seen by 500 people instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Have you tried being born wealthy? :-D

permalink
report
reply
35 points

I’ll try that next respawn

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What’s the code to unlock it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

HESOYAM

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

2 new friends in 4 years? That’s pretty great.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

What a beautiful perspective. I was thirdhand crushed by this data before you said that :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

i wish i made a long lasting friend every 2 years or so.

besides, those will give you the connections you need to actually date.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Seriously, how do you even get the data to make such graphs?

On another note, I don’t have much sympathy for people who clearly “swipe right on everyone”. I am aware that it’s a numbers game, but have since standards, man.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*

Bro he got 14 matches in four years, how can he afford to have standards. If he has any more standards, he will get ZERO matches

Also you can request this data from tinder and bumble support

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You won’t get any matches if you don’t tell the algorithm what kind of person you’re interested in. It won’t be able to put you with people you’re compatible with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m interested in: people that breathe

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I find that this isn’t actually a successful way to filter or get the “algorithm” to recognize people you might be interested in. Those features are built in, but you need the premium versions of the apps to do the filtering.

I hopped onto Bumble after a few years and nearly every one I get doesn’t match my values or how I swipe. I thought it might work like that, but I get Christian Conservative more than any other demo and my profiles and swipes do not match that type.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You are talking to a person with a 0,295623% chance of getting a match…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a bit high standards for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

use a simple counter for your left and right swipes, then you just need to count the matches and which ones fizzle out

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

The main problem here: commercial dating apps are not intended to help people find partners or flings. They are intended to make the companies money. Some may initially be functional but enshitification hits them fast, once they have a userbase established.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I believe the algorithms on those apps purposefully hold back the best matches for you unless you pay for a subscription.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Honestly. I suspect they hold back the best matches even if you do pay for a subscription, so you continue to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh, they do. There have been lawsuits. Why would the company want to lose a paying customer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I met my boyfriend on OkCupid. That was 5 years ago and I doubt we’d be able to find each other today. The app went from matches based on answering questions to a “hot or not” sleazy hookup tinder clone.

It makes even less sense when you learn that they were never in competition with tinder since the two of them are owned by the same parent company along with nearly even other dating app. You’d think that company would want all its services to be unique in some way so as to encourage diversity in the market but I guess I’ve not got a mind for business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Wow that’s crazy. I still remember some of the questions that supposedly made me and my partner 99% compatible. That’s such a drastic shift for them.

Edit for unrelated story: My second highest match was like 97%, but she clarified in her profile that she was looking for a bi third to join her and her partner. OKC kept recommending her so eventually I just messaged her to say “I’m not what you’re looking for but good luck!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Unrelated, good screenname :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Dude…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re basically all owned by the same company, unless it’s small and niche.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Data Is Beautiful

!dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

Community stats

  • 894

    Monthly active users

  • 143

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments

Community moderators