81 points

If he can lay down a four-belt balancer from memory, you are the side hoe to his Factorio addiction.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Her: "He’s thinking about other women now…isn’t he?

Him: “If I rebuilt my rocket control units factory, I could reach a rocket launch every 4 minutes vs 4.5. Then if I optimize my platform in space…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Platform in space? What what what? Is it time to sink another 100 hours?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Check out the Space Exploration Mod. The Vanilla game is like the first 10% of the mod. It’s truly a lot. It’s so good that the modder was hired to help make the expansion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

100? Barely enough to get to space

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I play Satisfactory instead, but I felt that in my soul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We may pray to different gods, but the factories must grow.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Four to four balancer ist easy. How about a eight by eight?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was about to say this. At LEAST wait for a 6 belt balancer to think the man can’t be saved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which one? The shortest one with the bump on the side, or the narrow on that is never wider than 8 belts?? Here, let me show yo…. Ohmigawd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, my first thought is that the ‘map games’ are the side hoe to my factory game addiction, which is mostly Factorio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Map man map man map map map men men men

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Obscure and good

permalink
report
parent
reply

Who are you, and where’s the map!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

But do they know the difference between Istanbul and Constantinople?

permalink
report
reply
35 points

That’s nobody’s business but the Turks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Why’d they change it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I can’t say.

Maybe people just liked it better that way?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Could you take me back to Constantinople?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s nobody’s business but the Turks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i think the city had several names and the official byzantine name was after constantine, it makes sense that after the ottomans took the city they didn’t keep honoring the dude they took it from. they started using other names along with constantine’s, and and eventually this one won out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Official name of Constantinople was Konstantiniye in Ottoman, just pronounciation of same word.

And Actually Istanbul is not named by Turks, it is not Turkish. Most believed theory is that when city grew in 18th century, like circles around old city by suburs and outskirts, Greeks among new residents started tlaks about these areas as stampoli (or however it is written in Greek), translate as “stam” means “to” or “near”, “poli” means “city”. And after a while, since population and area of old city became so small in comparison, by 19th century locals from all nation started called city Stampoli or however they can pronounce, such Turks as Istampul. That became İstanbul (easier to say) and it wasn’t until Turkey it was official name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But what about Istanbul and Konstantiniyye?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

How they hell would anyone not know the difference? It’d be like not knowing the difference between Taylor Swift and Madonna.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Most people don’t have a clue. I remember mentionning the word byzantine at the dinner table when I was a teenager and was told “you play too many games and read too many books, this is reality, there’s no such thing as a byzantine”.

When I showed them the wikipedia page about it, “it’s not because it’s on the internet that it’s true”. Yet here we are, in 2024, where they are glued to facebook believing some of the wildest things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah, I’ve noticed there’s this weird cross-section of people who ask “do you believe everything you heard on the internet?” about some pretty established facts, and blindly believing Fox News.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a logical fallacy, aka a debate trick for stupid people. Appeal to authority (something can’t be true unless it’s said by someone with the authority to be right) plus a claim that source doesn’t have the authority to be right. Another version of this is when someone acts like citations are proof (or a lack of citations is a disproof).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I mean, there was no such thing as a byzantine. That’s a name we came up with in the modern era to help distinguish between “roman” empires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

To expand on that it was during the enlightenment in the early renaissance where people had a boner over the Roman Empire but still thought the medieval Roman Empire (Byzantine) to not be cool. So they came up with a new name for it. A declining empire that had a massive beauracracy, spoke Greek and had the wrong brand of Christianity (Orthodox) is not nice enough to create a glorious image like the Pax Romana did.

This of course made a lot of people upset in the then Ottoman empire since they identified as Romans but were not counted as Romans according to western people. Think “You’re not Romans with a glorious history, you’re Byzantines” even though they clearly were.

For extra fun the Byzantine/Roman distinction is also unfair.

  • Eastern Rome always spoke Greek, even at 200AD.
  • Orthodox and Catholic were the same pre-schism.
  • During the decline of the Western Empire the capital was moving a lot anyway so “based in Rome” was soon outdated.
  • During the decline Italy was just another province anyway so “based in Italy” was soon outdated.
  • They were literally the same thing except one half managed to fuck their shit up while getting invaded by hordes of tribes at the same time.
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well clearly the Earth is flat because here’s a picture of some water reflecting off a puddle, and that totally proves it apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yeah, it’s a pivotol part of European history that has ramifications to the present day. It’s like not knowing the difference between England and a second thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As a high school graduate I can totally tell you the history of Europe.

So first it was 1066, then the Victorians, then the second world war, then it was now. That’s it, all of European history. Now perhaps some Americans think another historically important event occurred, but it can’t have, because no one mentioned it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think some other stuff may have happened, but none of it was really oil/freedom related so we learned about confederate generals and Mormon pioneer history instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And the scariest part about history I learned in school is that the Vikings always took over the world because they don’t need a Cassus Belli.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I know I learned about them twenty years ago but I don’t recall anything about either of them anymore, so that’s how I can’t know the difference anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It helps that They Might Be Giants wrote a song about it. Constantinople was the capital of what we now call "The Byzantine Empire’’ (at the time they just called it ‘The Roman Empire’) Istanbul was the capital of The Ottoman Empire. And as everyone knows. Istanbul was once Constantinople.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why did Constantinople get the works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Constantinople was also the capitol of the ottomen empire, the name change came after ww1, when attaturk Formed Turkey

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I know what the difference is and don’t play those map video games.

But I do like shoving little soldiers around the table top. And the only thing historic about those is that most of them are no longer being produced.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I bet you would love some hardcore strategy games then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The most hardcore “map game” I’m playing is Total War (Warhammer these days). I do love me some Starcraft though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I do think that counts. Medieval 2 had both byzantines and turks in almost perfectly opposite colors, purple vs green

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hoi4 Black Ice?

While I love the Total War combo of strategic map play + in the field tactical control, I think there are a good deal of map games even more technically complex, but they are incredibly niche.

Starcraft is an RTS with no real grand strategy, I don’t think that counts as a ‘map game’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Big maps, little movement, lots of stuff to track; Hearts Of Iron is made for folks like you and me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nah, a 4’x6’ table is a big enough map for me most days.
I’m more of a Total War gamer than something like Heart of Iron anyways. Or better yet: some good old Starcraft, if we limit it to strategy alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What is the difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Ottoman’s get free unit production with military schools as well as faster production in blacksmith influence. Also producing units and ageing up gives your expirence towards vizier points, which can unlock special bonis.

The Byzantines get the cistern system which increases gathering rate and can be toogled to eithe faster production or research speed. On top of that they get an additional resource, olive oil which they passivly produce from food gathering and can be used to purchase mercenary units from other factions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hells yeah AoE4! I’ve been a Byzantines main since they released that civ as an option. Love the cistern & aqueduct system.

But I think the above commenter was referencing tabletop wargaming, not RTS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The difference between what?

Those map games and shoving little plastic soldiers over the table top?
Those map games are huge, having many armies on the map and managing your state. While shoving soldiers over the table top usually just involves your one army with no state management at all and the map just consisting of the game you are playing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Our context is the tweet in the post and that mentions the difference between the Ottoman and Byzantine empires.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 680

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments