159 points

Good. This is the kinda shit Dems should keep doing. It doesn’t matter if it sounds petty, these assholes are a threat to our democracy, they should not be allowed to spew their lies without consequences. If the press refuses to do their job, it falls to whoever is closest to a Republican.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

Buttigieg should be front and center a lot. He’s whip smart, a great speaker, and really relatable

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Yes. But I don’t think he’s a “dem” like the ones forcing Biden so trump wins. Therefor it’ll be him making his way with little help sadly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Thank you, I’m so tired of this loyalty to decorum. Call them what they are, authoritarian regressives

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Christofascists

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Step 1: sell the press to the rich

Step 2: everything is shitty now, but why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We sold everything else to the rich. Why stop at the press?

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

“I’m wondering if there’s some point- if you’ve identified some point where you will stop, where the administration will stop, where the federal government will stop this requirement and let the market decide…"

Let the market decide? Sure let’s do that. As of now, let’s have the U.S. government stop subsidizing the oil industry to the tune of $20 billion+ per year and see who keeps buying gas powered cars when gas is $15-20 per gallon. Better still, pour that $20 billion into EV car development and green energy and help save the fucking planet.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

not EVs. public transport. or at least mostly that and a little EVs

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Both, in particular, EV public transport. Something like this would be nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Do NOT use battery electric busses when you could use trolleybusses. Or even better, just use trams

That being said, anything is better than diesel busses

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

For future readers, the quote in this comment is from GOP Representative Perry who was then immediately proven wrong by Buttigieg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Let the market decide" is like saying “Let the intoxicated person drive the car.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Better yet pour the 20billion into reliabke regional and long distance rail infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

EVs can’t save the environment. EVs are made from oil (tires, plastics), and the metals they are made from are extracted and shipped using huge machines also made from and burning oil.

Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

Any mode of transportation that is heavy and uses tires is going to be a major source of microplastics.

It is not possible to expand into sustainability when it’s our massive scale that is at the core of our unsustainability. Degrowth is our only chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

I’ll take the lesser evil of local pollution over sending billions of tons of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere every year.

I doubt degrowth will ever happen unless it’s caused by population collapse due to mass casualties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think education alone curbs population growth towards negatives, and that policies can easily decrease population growth far into the negative, as many modern nations have illustrated. Mass casualties aren’t realistic or necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

8 billion is unsustainable, our population will decrease drastically in the coming century. We can choose whether it’s via degrowth (a controlled, intentional, intelligent reversal of the economic growth of the last decades) or famine, disease, and war.

I fear you’re right that degrowth will never happen and we’re just going to march toward collapse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You’re missing options like rail

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Rail as part of degrowth is a great idea. Rail as part of expanded exploitation of natural resources is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

We did both before EVs were a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration. It’s great that he gets the occasional moments like this, but he’s not exactly being set up for a run at the Presidency in 2028.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Dude’s only 42. He’s got plenty of time. Hell you can’t even get elected these days if you aren’t getting social security.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Pete 2064!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, I’d like for him to get a shot BEFORE he’s a senior citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I dunno if I’d consider Secratary of Transportation as a low stakes role, he’s been out and about getting IIJA funds out across the country and there to present new rail, highway, air and marine infrastructure improvements.

Plus, if an unspeakable fate were to befall thirteen specific individuals, simultaneously rendering them unable to perform their duties, you’d have a President Buttigieg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You could make a TV show out of that

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I believe that was basically the plot of Designated Survivor, so they already did

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Compared to Defense, State, Homeland Security, Attorney General…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

He needs to age into his vibe first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration.

Mr. Buttigieg is just a small bean from Indiana. If we want real leadership, we need to look to a more successful set of mayoral candidates. Like Michael Bloomberg or Lori Lightfoot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fuckin Bloomberg?!? getdafuckouttahere

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fucking Lightfoot? Lol, okay buddy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would not like either of those options. I’d take Jeff Jackson (NC) or Buttigieg any day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

A lot of GOP voters don’t really care about facts sadly. I’ve talked to some that insist Jan 6th wasn’t an issue.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

A lot? Pretty much all of them. Look at how many lies trump said during the debate… they’ll lie directly to their base and their base isn’t even intelligent enough to question it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They even know they’re being lied to, and still go along.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Because they somehow think the lying will benefit them and not the people they hate.

Predicting a republican’s reaction to any issue is easy because they are all grifters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

All of these hearings serve no purpose other than to give Congress people 4 minutes of time to create some sound bites for the campaign.

Questions are widely leading or very inaccurate or even just lies … If they ask a question at all. Some just spout garbage for a few minutes.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Not always. Both Trump’s NY fraud conviction, and election interference (hush money) felonies came out of the Michael Cohen hearing, specifically from AOC questions.

Your overall point is absolutely correct, though. It’s even more frustrating when it’s easy to see how powerful these hearings can be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fishing for a guppy and caught a whale?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I wouldn’t say so. She asked direct, pointed questions about how the Trump org had over valued properties and other assets in order to get more favorable loans. She knew exactly what she was doing during that hearing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It goes both ways, I’m sure Buttigieg is happy to be in the news

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments