49 points

Wow. Elections really bring out the nation’s most disgusting, deplorable, degenerates.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Wait until you see the candidates!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I really wanna go back to when if a candidate went ‘yeeeeah’ in too weird a voice we all just dropped them out of the running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They’re like national-level county fairs that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When you realize what type of people think they’re so great they should be in charge of EVERYONE, it makes a lot of sense really. Decent people don’t often seek out that kind of power and have the intense need to be in the spotlight at all times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

“I didn’t eat that dog and assault that nanny, but if I did the brain worms made me do it - I’m not a church boy!”

This was the full quote for those of you who didn’t read the article.

permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

Actual quote:

The Vanity Fair article also features Eliza Cooney, a former part-time babysitter who worked for Kennedy between 1998 and 1999, alleging that he groped her in his kitchen. Kennedy declined to directly acknowledge the sexual assault accusation at first, instead dismissing “the other allegations” as part of a “very, very rambunctious youth.”

“I’ve said this from the beginning. I am not a church boy. I am not running like that. I said … I had a very, very rambunctious youth. I said in my announcement speech that I have … so many skeletons in my closet, that if they could all vote, I could run for king of the world,” Kennedy said, adding, “Vanity Fair is recycling 30-year-old stories, and I, you know, am not gonna comment on the details of any of them.”

When asked directly whether he denied sexually assaulting Cooney, Kennedy repeated, “I’m not going to comment on it.”

This comes right after he directly and at length denied the allegations that he ate part of a dog.

Also, this part of his very, very rambunctious youth happened (allegedly) when he was 45 and had several children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Saying “I had a rambunctious childhood” and “I’ve got so many skeletons in my closet” like it absolves him from anything…

“Yeah, I strangled that hooker while high on coke and while getting blown by that other hooker. So what? Why are you surprised? I told you I had a rambunctious childhood!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That’s par for the course. Trump’s “locker room talk” about the joys of sexual assault happened when he was in his 60’s, but they still hand waved it away as if it was a minor transgression by a teenager.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Did you sexually assualt that poor woman?

“I’m no church boy”

That’s a REALLY bad answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He was just an excitable boy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
29 points

When a brain wormed, dog eating, sexual assaulter isn’t even the worst candidate in the election your know you’re in America baby.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

its like the aliens have spliced together every shitty story plot we have ever broadcast on television and are now playing it back for us in our heads.

what. the. actual. fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Cries in Venezuelan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

“He ate out a dog. It’s a big difference.”

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 427K

    Comments