58 points

The media is being paid to just hamper this. Isn’t it strange that no one cares about trump viabiity for the office?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I’m concerned about both Biden and Trump viability in office, as many people are…just because you complain about Biden doesn’t mean you support Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

just because you complain about Biden doesn’t mean you support Trump.

No centrist will ever understand this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From this interview it looks like his motor skills are slow but he is functioning fine.

This whole thing was astroturfed, because trump knows Biden could get some Republicans voting for him. If it wasn’t, we would see similar requests for trump to stop down, but there are crickets, why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well, sure some things may look fine now, but when people.get that old it only takes one thing to throw them.off the rails.

Both Biden and Trump are at risk of the same thing because they are both old as fuck.

President is a 4 year job commitment.

When my grandpa was 86 he was perfectly healthy and gardening outdoors and doing living independently in his 2 storey house.

By the time he was 90 he was practically in a wheelchair and confined to one level of his house and unable to go outside to his backyard.

My grandma was at that point from 64-68

People over 55 should not be allowed to run for president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From this interview it looks like his motor skills are slow but he is functioning fine

For anyone that wants to judge for themselves:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8LoAsHz-Mc

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Trump’s cognitive deficiencies are old news, whereas the Biden we’re seeing now is unrecognizable from the last campaign. Given the narrow margin Biden won by last time, that should be concerning to his supporters. You really think this is a media conspiracy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s not. Democrats right now would vote for Biden if he was in a coma. We had the “luxury” of experiencing how each of them run the country.

Biden, unlike other potential democratic candidates is more likely to have some non trump Republicans voting for him.

The fact that media is only talking about Biden without urging trump to step down shows me the whole thing is astroturfed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is about the most incorrect analysis I can imagine.

Democrats right now would vote for Biden if he was in a coma

You would. But this core contingent of “vote blue no matter who” people is not large enough to win in the general.

Biden, unlike other potential democratic candidates is more likely to have some non trump Republicans voting for him.

Biden represents the same thing the Democrats have been offering for decades. Anyone who’s a Republican has already seen people like Biden and said, “No thanks, not interested.” Yeah he’s a centrist, but he doesn’t cut across party lines because he doesn’t bring anything new or different to the table.

The fact that media is only talking about Biden without urging trump to step down shows me the whole thing is astroturfed.

This is an absurd conspiracy theory. There have been plenty of high level Democrats calling for him to resign, as well as a significant number of Democratic voters. His debate performance raised concerns about his mental competency that everyone who isn’t self-deluding can see.

It’s completely meaningless to call for your enemy to step down. Why on earth would Trump listen to Democrats and liberal media outlets telling him to step down? What you’re suggesting is stupid and pointless, it accomplishes nothing and serves only to justify your conspiracy theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Democrats right now would vote for Biden if he was in a coma

Not like the Republican is an existential threat to American democracy or anything, we can just half ass it…

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Anyone seriously debating about Biden’s viability already knows Trump would be an awful fucking candidate.

This is like debating the merits of katana vs long words and then wondering why nobody is talking about longbows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What’s funny about this is I remember critics saying to give Trump less attention in the news.

The problem is of course the fact that we’ve covered all his scandals from grab her by the pussy to January 6th and his criminal conviction. Newsflash: it doesn’t matter.

So time to try something different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It does matter, because we have two old people running for the office, and one of them is a convicted felon that should also be in prison.

We won’t be much better if we force Biden out. There isn’t anyone that would be a clear and obvious choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your argument is based on the wishful thinking that the citizenry is rational, informed, and not apathetic. This belief is within the context of there NOT being a massive right-wing propaganda machine that clearly controls the vast majority of the narrative in this country.

Like no shit we all know Trump is bad. Hello? He’s been saying this shit and doing TERRIBLE things for over 8 years now.

The problem is that for whatever reason, none of this shit is sticking, even when the media covers things like January 6th hearings, his criminal indictments, his impeachments, etc…

So while Biden’s numbers continue to decline and Trump widens his lead, are you REALLY going to sit there and say, “hey guys don’t worry, just one more scandal and this time we got him!”?

So naturally since the cult isn’t changing, we must change ourselves to improve our odds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We won’t be much better if we force Biden out.

But we will be better.

There isn’t anyone that would be a clear and obvious choice.

The party doesn’t nurture new talent because they’re scared of moving to the left. Guess we gotta stick with the guy who party leadership wants no matter what!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s really fun watching liberals devolve into MAGA-like conspiracies about the news media. Super good sign for the health of the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

… what about… ism…

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

A smart move on Biden’s part. A neurological evaluation isn’t a test that is going to come back with a positive or a negative. No matter who took the test, there would be a wealth of statistics for dishonest actors to distort.

I suppose he could take a simplified screening test like Trump did, but that was not done by an independent neurologist.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

A smart move on Biden’s part.

I agree. You don’t concede things like this. And honestly until last Thursday, it wasn’t Biden’s mental faculties that had him in the doghouse, it was his political ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I mean - I’d prefer he just stepped back voluntarily but you’re entirely correct that a neurological test is nothing but a trap. If he submitted to one fox would have a panel of dishonest doctors ready to pick it apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I just want to beat the Republicans and Trump. Biden is certainly a liability in that regard, but replacing him might be worse. Any replacement would almost certainly be another establishment lackey, and Biden has surprisingly been the best establishment president we could hope for. I think he is still very capable of being president, but I don’t know that he is capable of campaigning for president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Also there’s no pleasing the cult. It’ll be faked, tampered with, or whatever, but in no case would anyone go “okay, now I’m satisfied and reassured.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Honestly at this point the DNC can pick someone - anyone - and I’d be fine with it.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Anyone? Clinton? Manchin? Sinema?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Maybe the Lord Almighty needs to step in and exercise His ultimate veto…

permalink
report
reply
16 points

why would god off Biden but not Trump?

also, what kind of asshole did Er have to be, to get god’s special attention? (Gen 38, the asshole that god smote because “reasons”, leading to the story of Judah and Tamar… and also most famously the horribly-out-of-context justification for banning contraceptives.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

why would god off Biden but not Trump?

Because he’s a petty, spiteful, vengeful ghost who could have made a universe free from suffering and chose not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Pretty sure they were simply referring to Biden’s repeated insistence that if “the Lord Almighty” came down and told him to step down, he would do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The Lord Almighty is not coming down

The year is young Papa Joe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Anyone remember the movie Wag the Dog? The folksy saying “you don’t swich horses midstream” was the literal campaign message?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments