Joe Biden has been one of America’s most consequential presidents, as well as a dear friend and partner to me. Today, we’ve also been reminded — again — that he’s a patriot of the highest order.

Sixteen years ago, when I began my search for a vice president, I knew about Joe’s remarkable career in public service. But what I came to admire even more was his character — his deep empathy and hard-earned resilience; his fundamental decency and belief that everyone counts.

Since taking office, President Biden has displayed that character again and again. He helped end the pandemic, created millions of jobs, lowered the cost of prescription drugs, passed the first major piece of gun safety legislation in 30 years, made the biggest investment to address climate change in history, and fought to ensure the rights of working people to organize for fair wages and benefits. Internationally, he restored America’s standing in the world, revitalized NATO, and mobilized the world to stand up against Russian aggression in Ukraine.

More than that, President Biden pointed us away from the four years of chaos, falsehood, and division that had characterized Donald Trump’s administration. Through his policies and his example, Joe has reminded us of who we are at our best — a country committed to old-fashioned values like trust and honesty, kindness and hard work; a country that believes in democracy, rule of law, and accountability; a country that insists that everyone, no matter who they are, has a voice and deserves a chance at a better life.

This outstanding track record gave President Biden every right to run for re-election and finish the job he started. Joe understands better than anyone the stakes in this election — how everything he has fought for throughout his life, and everything that the Democratic Party stands for, will be at risk if we allow Donald Trump back in the White House and give Republicans control of Congress.

I also know Joe has never backed down from a fight. For him to look at the political landscape and decide that he should pass the torch to a new nominee is surely one of the toughest in his life. But I know he wouldn’t make this decision unless he believed it was right for America. It’s a testament to Joe Biden’s love of country — and a historic example of a genuine public servant once again putting the interests of the American people ahead of his own that future generations of leaders will do well to follow.

We will be navigating uncharted waters in the days ahead. But I have extraordinary confidence that the leaders of our party will be able to create a process from which an outstanding nominee emerges. I believe that Joe Biden’s vision of a generous, prosperous, and united America that provides opportunity for everyone will be on full display at the Democratic Convention in August. And I expect that every single one of us are prepared to carry that message of hope and progress forward into November and beyond.

For now, Michelle and I just want to express our love and gratitude to Joe and Jill for leading us so ably and courageously during these perilous times — and for their commitment to the ideals of freedom and equality that this country was founded on.

102 points

These are the great peoples of our time.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Obama was not a perfect president, but at least he’s an adult and statesman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Interesting that he’s not even mentioning Harris.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

He did the same thing with Biden for four years ago. He is trying to help the party rally around whoever the nominee is so he stays out of the selection arguments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

What a former president should do. Stay out of the spotlight and let others take the lead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I think Obama had the news that Biden was withdrawing while the decision to endorse Harris was still being ironed out. I think it was likely in draft form a week ago. I don’t think it’s weird he didn’t mention Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Doubtful.

Who will run in Biden’s place is a central consideration.

I think Obama very deliberately left Harris’s name out.

E: Know-nothings downvoting this, not sure why. You seriously believe this was an oversight? That Obama let it slip through? Dude was editor in chief of the Harvard Law Review.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is Ralph Nader still alive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

Disappointing really, political leaders need to learn how to pass on to the next generation. The Dems are especially guilty of staying in office too long, and screwing up their own legacy in the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s not an accident. While likely, it isn’t guaranteed that Harris will be the nominee. While Michelle has said she doesn’t want to do it, she is on the short list of possibilities. If Barack had given an endorsement to Harris and then Michelle changes her mind, things get awkward.

Even if none of that comes to pass, including a message of support would be seen as an endorsement, and there’s no particular reason Barack needs to endorse Harris at this time. That’s seen as something of an official act, and politicians are very careful not to hand out an endorsement until they mean it. Doubly so when they’re former Presidents.

Lets say the party has a mess of a convention and Harris is struggling to band together the necessary delegate votes. Barack can step in and endorse her at that time to help give her an edge. Or he may see a better candidate and endorse them. In either case, there’s no reason to bind to a decision right now.

Perhaps Harris sails through the nomination. Barack can step in and endorse then to give her a boost in the general election. That boost isn’t necessarily just votes, either. Big name donors are listening, too.

From where Barack sits, there’s zero downside to waiting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Like 300 delegates and everybody else has already endorsed her. And after raising 70 million dollars yesterday, she has the nomination. There’s no way it isn’t Harris on the ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Who put Michelle on the shortlist besides Fox News pundits trying to bait the racists?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I can’t believe you’re being downvoted for this opinion, it’s really not that controversial a statement. I guess people have already memory-holed Dianne Feinstein and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And Kennedy and Byrd. It’s a running shit show of politicians thinking they’ll live forever, or never lose an election. When what every one of them needs to be doing from day one, is prepping a successor in the public eye. A simple “thanks for electing me, and keep an eye on this awesome dude that wants my job too.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean Joe stepped aside, didn’t he? Doesn’t mean you have to say oh this person’s young so I automatically think they are the right one for the job

permalink
report
parent
reply
-72 points

Yeah but fuck Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Uh, you said you wanted Bernie 2 days ago. He’s not running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’ve convinced me. Harris is awful I’ll vote for Trump instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I’m confused as to why this is such a downvoted opinion…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Why did that feel like a repurposed eulogy?

permalink
report
reply
23 points

A eulogy is any speech in praise of someone—it’s not restricted to funerals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

And yet me reading a eulogy I wrote for the groom at my cousins wedding was “deeply inappropriate” and somehow I was “making aunt linda very uncomfortable” smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On this day, we remember !AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world. Their words, their replies, their sentences.

Gather ye rosebuds while ye may…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Obama uses medium?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Love it. I hope he’s abandoned all the social media trash out of principle. Lead by example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I swore he used Twitter/X at one point. It’s cool that he uses Medium, maybe he’ll even host it on his site one day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

He helped end the pandemic,

Well I’m relieved to learn that the pandemic ended

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 429K

    Comments