Offers better brine handling and produces higher-purity water, making it ideal for offshore green hydrogen production. Sustainable and efficient solution with low environmental impact.

Green hydrogen?

What other colors can it come in?

No seriously… Isn’t all hydrogen “green?” Is there bad hydrogen? 🤔

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Is there bad hydrogen? 🤔

The Hindenburg would have some things to say about this…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To be fair, it wasn’t designed for hydrogen, but helium.

It’s like putting diesel into a petrol engine (or vice versa), and saying petrol is bad when the engine inevitably explodes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Green/grey/blue/whatever refers to the production process and the energy sources used to make the hydrogen, because the production and powering it with electricity also requires emitting greenhouse gases. Most of the hydrogen produced today is gray hydrogen produced using fossil fuels. I don’t understand why we hear so much about hydrogen as being the fuel of the future, when straight electrification would be more efficient, but maybe I’m missing something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

For some things hydrogen doesn’t really make sense, but for everything else it’s basically a form of a battery. The one big advantage it has over batteries is its weight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yup. Green hydrogen comes from splitting water with electricity from renewables.

Other flavours of hydrogen come from splitting natural gas, using electricity from burning stuff. Which isn’t as green.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How do you handle the brine? “Minimal amounts” of brine is not an answer. What’s a minimal amount? What are you going to do with it? If you dump it back in the ocean, you increase salinity.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Why is increasing salinity of the ocean bad? Doesn’t that happen all the time on a much greater scale as ocean water evaporates into the atmosphere?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
1 point

I’m not suggesting that it’s not bad, but that article didn’t seem to talk about rising ocean salinity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your link (or at least what I’ve read from it) doesn’t cover why it would be bad to make the ocean saltier; it only talks about the rise of the salty ocean water.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The brine solution will contain concentrated amounts of elements, like lithium. That concentrated solution may be economicly viable to process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Fine. What do you do about the salt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My idea was you take it to a played-out salt mine, and you just put it right back in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Fine. What do you do about the salt?

We distribute it to fanbases across the internet, who are adept at managing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know if that works with brine. But what I know is that many regions fill old mines with salt and heat it up with excess energy from solar in the summer to use as general energy storage and for heat in the winter. That might be a good way to repurpose the brine

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I said this in another comment- I’d be very worried it would get into the water table. That brine is not just salt. It’s also full of toxins. But maybe there are good solutions that I don’t know about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah it was just something I came up with. We can only hope that someone will find a good solution on what to do with it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can’t find a better explanation anywhere for how it works than “it uses condensation”

So I have to guess the seawater is evaportated directly from the waters surface or something, which would just leave all the salts in there. That would be exactly as problematic as a traditional desalination plant pumping it’s brine back into the ocean. Maybe my guess about how it works is wrong though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, it seems to me that you only have three options when it comes to the brine, and none of them are good- bury it and hope it doesn’t get into the water table, leave it where it is and hope it doesn’t leak, or dump it back in the ocean and increase ocean salinity. I don’t see another option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I wonder how expensive shipping brine would be… Probably very until we can get it ludicrously concentrated.

But then I imagine we could take it somewhere like the middle of an uninhabitably hot desert and just fill up a low point in the topology. The combination of distance from where people live and dry hot conditions drying it out as fast as possible would possibly work?

It wouldn’t be worth it unless shipping the brine was cheaper than just shipping clean water from places that have it to places that don’t. But who knows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Current techniques appear to use around 1.8-2kWh/m3 for desalination. That would imply that this uses only 350-400Wh. You’d think you could her better production from 9m2 just going up a few solar panels and putting a conventional plant. I presume the author has no fucking clue how desalination of solar heating and distillation works and/or hasn’t even read the patent to find out how this works.

Good on the student team for thinking creatively, but they seem to have only two engineers but four managers on the team. And not a single coherent description from those four managers, who seem very proud of taking credit for the students’ work.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I’m wondering if the “amazing” part is that its just physically smaller? It says less brine which means either its not pumping through a ton of seawater…or some how making the salt go somewhere. So I’m thinking its that its a small foot print and cheap materials meaning that its accessible to more people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From some digging the “amazing” part is that it’s floating. I’m not sure how they do distribution and collection, but from the UMA page it’s a vapor distillation process - same as the old survival distillation process but on a floating platform. Solar energy heats the water, evaporating some, and it is passed over a cooler to condense the water. The “no brine” claim comes from the fact that they so inefficient that the localize increase in brine concentration due to the extraction of desalinated water is within the limits for not requiring treatment - they’re just lifting evaporate from the surface and (I’m guessing) using a low power circulation loop to draw water from below the surface as their condensation cooling loop. I suppose it’s possible that the cooling may even be a convectively driven vs a photoelectric conversion and standard pump, which would be useful for low maintenance. It’s a cool project, no doubt. I’m still not sure how they’re doing bulk collection and distribution of 1000kg of water a day. Maybe that’s the 17% energy figure. Maybe it’s someone else’s problem to solve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I appreciate that you dug this up. That’s actually sort of cool little project.

The problem with the old condensation technique (other then the fact that it is naturally inefficient) is that depending on where you are and air currents you can’t always depend on a great output when humidity drops. This solves that problem as the ocean is constantly evaporating. But that also means that this is just a project that can’t go much further, as you can’t really scale it for global use. There is a finite amount of humidity in the air, and absorbing it from one place just reduces it in another. You would be better off just floating giant rain collectors into the ocean… at least then you’re only stealing water that would have became salinated anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks for digging

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

It’s not clear from the article, but if this is a direct solar-to-dessalination I can understand how it uses less energy (why does it use any energy at all?) than other methods with pumps and filters, the issue is rate maybe, but I can’t find a paper about this.

Found https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/malaga-students-patent-an-innovative-solar-desalination-system-to-produce-green-hydrogen/ which says it produces 1 cubic meter per day, which is great for small-scale seaside production. Again, I have no access to details of how 1 square meter of sunlight (or more, maybe they use mirrors to concentrate sunlight, it says 9 square meters, as kerfuffle mentioned) can dessalinate 1 cubic meter of water per day, but it’s great if it works, just wondering why solar dessalination hadn’t been tried to this degree of success before.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Typically people will prefer the option that gives them a $50 water bill over a $200 one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

water should be free

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is very good news if it can be scaled.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Come back in 3+ years according to the article

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 528K

    Comments