Earlier this month, Hungary announced a new facilitated visa scheme under which citizens of eight countries, including Russia and Belarus, can enter Hungary without security checks or other restrictions. Budapest claims that many of those entering under this scheme will be building a nuclear power plant.

“We are unpleasantly surprised by media reports that Hungary has included Russian and Belarusian citizens in its national immigration programme, which will allow them to enter and move freely within the Schengen area,” Lithuania’s Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said in a written statement.

“In Lithuania’s view, Hungary’s decision poses very serious threats to the security of the Schengen area and many European countries, and must therefore be responded to at the EU level,” the Lithuanian foreign minister said.

The minister believes that Hungary’s decision requires a separate assessment at a time when European countries are facing an increasing number of acts of sabotage, which this reinforces the urgency of finding an adequate response to such a stance by one member state.

54 points

Kick them out of Schengen and block the borders. That should make them rethink their position fairly swiftly.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Internal borders to Hungary closing just a few months into Orbán’s presidency would be a brilliant and appropriate response.

Fuck around and find out, as they say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh well we would probably have to kick Slovakia out too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Let’s just say: blocking Hungary will have a very “educating” effect on others…

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

How difficult would it be to kick Hungary out of the union? They don’t deserve to be in it anymore. Let them make their bed with Russia but without EU funds.

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

AfaIk, it’s impossible to kick it out of EU. However, it is possible to suspend it’s membership using article 7 of EU treaty in case of severe violation of human rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How about Schengen, though? Is there a mechanism for permanently expelling a member from that? Or do we have to permanently close their borders temporarily?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

…which suspend their voting rights. While those rights are suspended, change the treaties so that it takes at least 3 members to veto any action of the EU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Under EU rules, national governments have the right to decide on legal migration and work permits.

I don‘t see the problem here then.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

I don‘t see the problem here then.

They can decide whatever they want. They just have to live with the consequences. We don’t want easy entry for Russian and Belarusian citizens (which is, in turn, our right). So if you want to allow these citizens free access to your country, fine. But don’t expect us to then also grant you free access to ours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

In 2022, the EU imposed sanctions on Russia and Belarus after Russia launched a full-scale war in Ukraine. While they do not ban Russians from travelling to the EU…

Another quote from the article.

Your idea is to exclude Hungary from Schengen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

ah I see you do. Great

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

The problem here is apparently Orban, just read the full article. That aside, I fully support @Quittenbrot’s response in this thread (‘Kick them out of Schengen and block the borders’).

Edit: @Successful_Try543 also has a good proposal imo (‘suspend it’s membership using article 7 of EU treaty in case of severe violation of human rights’).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think, granting people easy visa rights that shouldn’t get them for good security reasons can be considered a severe violation of human rights though.

While the human rights situation in Hungary is also getting worse, i also doubt it to qualify as “severe” yet. At least so far none of the other EU countries have used that as a formal reason and Germany was happy to deport a queer antifascist to Hungary just a few weeks back, for allegedly having attacked Nazis there. This definetly should not have had happened, but goes to show how far away from calling Hungary out on human rights violations we still are.

Problem with border patrols though is that they don’t work against Schengen visas anyways afaik. If you are a legal resident in one EU country, you can travel inside the Schengen area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points
*

? I obviously read the article, the quote is part of what you omitted from it. And then, you say the problem is Orban? What kind of nonsensical answer is that? Some think his policies are, and this specific policy might be debatable. How about that?

Edit: If the EU will claim Hungary is severely violating human rights by allowing people to cross its border, my faith in this project will be at its end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Could you explain your position? Are you not against Russians entering EU/Schengen? Or are you against the methods used?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I agree, every country neighbouring Hungary can reestablish the border controls and keep russian “tourists” or chinese “policemen” out if they want too, this isn’t hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 991

    Posts

  • 6.7K

    Comments