109 points
*

How much AI do you want in your browser:

( ) None

( ) Zero

( ) I want my browser to automatically close any page that mentions AI

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Which of these options do you prefer:

( ) having an AI assistant integrated into the browser

( ) getting kicked in the balls by elon musk

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A genuinely tough decision

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well, getting kicked in the balls is a one-time affair, and I’m done having kids anyway, so I’d go with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i guess daddy musk is coming to make my dreams come true

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

hi we’re the marketing team and we already decided what we want to do, and we can make up whatever data you want to see for us to justify it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

More like

  • 2x slower browser

  • AI

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

that question seemed directly made by some software dev that shares my opinion lol

i picked 2x slower browser over ai because at least if it is gonna be slower im not gonna be harassed by some amalgamation of every incel shitpost on the Internet

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

What country do you live in: Germany, United States, Brazil, other

What? Weird survey options.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Data retention would be my guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Very weird, because it’s not sorted alphabetically. That means there is a bias in the sorting, because the first option is default and the best option for most users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They are sorted at random for each visitor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh I meant this as a joke, to place Germany as the best answer.^^ But regardless, good to know its random. Probably doesn’t even matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

could just be the countries with the most users or where they’ve seen a recent trend, up or down, in local market share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I didn’t see that question, but all 3 of those countries seem to rank pretty high on the country demographics for FOSS that I’ve seen (as in when individual FOSS projects do demographics surveys of their users)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It has always been

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Someone being funny? BUG

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

i don’t like how they used “want least”, it means three very different things:

  • i want this but it’s not the thing i want the most
  • i don’t care for this
  • oh god fuck no
permalink
report
reply
14 points

That’s why they did it in sets of three. They could just give every user a blank text box for every option, but doing it this way makes it far easier to analyze the data in bulk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

yea, but that gives you less info

this way, you can’t really differentiate from a feature that people want, but not as a priority, VS a feature that people don’t want ever

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And there’s no way to relate preference between features, at least in my case. I had one question that I entered “2x faster performance” as most want, and the next question was “2x slower performance,” but there was another crappy option in the same list that I also don’t want, so if I don’t pick “2x slower performance” as least want, what signal does that send?

I hope it all comes out in the wash, but honestly, I would’ve preferred a big list of all of the features with 4 options:

  • really want
  • want
  • meh
  • don’t want

I think I would’ve entered about even numbers of things for each category. They could even limit “really want” to top three or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It makes the survey easier to complete by users in small steps. Huge surveys scare users away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The survey design accounts for this. See https://lemm.ee/comment/13835466.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Which of the following attributes would you most want your new browser to have, and which would you want least?

Twice as slow as your current browser

Is that a joke?

permalink
report
reply
48 points

Control question probably, to check if you actually read the questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I forgot those exist and interpreted it as “Would you sacrifice performance for one of these features?”

Am I stupid?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I also thought it was a feature vs performance question. How can it be used as a control question?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mozilla might be insane

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s how I treated it too. I took it at face value.

I have modern hardware so I don’t care too much about browser performance. All browsers perform well on my hardware. Obviously some are more lightweight and optimised, but I have no doubts about my ability to comfortably browse the web on my hardware, so all the performance questions I tended to rank in the middle (ie not most or least important) as I don’t tend to notice browser performance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Makes sense. What about those who click that option as a joke? Maybe discount all other replies from that person because of that too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I mean, fair?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Or what if they don’t click it by joke, but because they actually prefer a 2x slower browser over such a feature?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

lol, yeah. 👍

I was doing a political poll just the other day and the third or fourth question was a color question like: “Which of the following is associated most with a ripe banana?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Eh, how ripe are we talking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I debated because I really disliked another option in there (I think it was split-screen for AI or something stupid) and it felt like it was designed to make me not rank something else I didn’t like as least desired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

For me that was together with

A privacy-respecting AI assistant that makes your browser smarter by learning how you use it

So I don’t really care how slow the browser is, as long as it doesn’t have an AI “assistant” that is monitoring my browser usage

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yup, I stuck that as “least want.” I already marked “2x faster performance” as “most want” on another question, so hopefully it all shakes out in the end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You clearly missed the point about “privacy respecting.” It will only share data with Meta, Google and the US government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wouldn’t mind an AI assistant, as long as it’s fully local.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But why? If you want that, you can just have it outside of your browser. Or maybe get an extension that works with an AI assistant on your machine.

I honestly don’t care either way about an AI assistant. I don’t intend to use it, so I’d much rather their efforts be spent elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why would you want that in a browser? We have LLMs you can run local.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s an Inferred importance method, as other users have commented it is likely that there are some calibration metrics in there. MaxDiff is the name of the approach if you want to check out more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wait, I swear mine said twice as fast. Well I guess I got filtered then. Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

There were both

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I had both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mozilla is weighting on the data. They found people love AI more than a slow browser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Everyone’s here complaining about the randomised questions when I’m just curious why location options are “Germany”, " Brazil", “USA”, or " Somewhere we don’t care about".

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Yeah wtf going on there, what’s Germany, Brazil and USA got the rest of us don’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Those are simply the most significant Firefox user bases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Privacy law considerations. Germany is downright good for its citizens. The US has a round about spying industry. Brazil basically has mandatory mass surveilance. Everyone else’s laws are more or less the same. Not identical. But Mozilla can meet their requirements pretty trivially

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everyone else’s laws are more or less the same.

The EU and UK have almost identical privacy laws - the GDPR, so Germany having exceptional privacy laws doesn’t hold up. As far as other privacy laws go I think France has a lead on Germany with approximately the same population, so privacy law can’t be the main consideration.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 926

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators