111 points

His strategy will be

  1. Throw word salad at every question

  2. declare his policies are the best that anyone has ever seen in the history.

  3. call “Camila” a Marxist, communist, socialist, bird brain, nasty woman, and a total disaster. All these words mean the same to him and his base.

  4. regardless how bad he does, declare himself a winner at the debate. Whine and fundraise for the rest of the campaign.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Classic pigeon playing chess strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-50 points

The hilarious part is Kamala will do her best to refute those claims. The best strategy is to say “no you”, but she won’t do that and will fall into his traps. If she calls him a rapist and a felon and a loser with small crowd sizes to his face, than that’s a different story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Why would she want to play to his strengths, by walking in and just throwing insults at him the whole time? That’s a terrible move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I don’t think this would necessarily be playing to his strengths, look at how effective the “weird” narrative has been.

Also, almost no one that would vote for Trump is doing so on policy. Sure, she needs to talk some policy to keep moderates (and actual leftists) engaged, but I think there’s some need to mock him and his movement.

To make a bit of an analogy, look at how Gamergate actually ended; it wasn’t from crossing any bridge that went too far, or convincing people they were enabling harassment, it ended when Steven Colbert made fun of the movement on his show, and then that got mainstream attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, cause y’all have been doing just a bang up job calling her moves ahead of time, huh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

When the weird orange felon does his trump trot mouth diarrhea thing, and he will, Kamala Harris should pick out the most obvious, most embarrassing or most offensive one, disassemble it in an unflattering way then say she doesn’t have the time to address the other lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

‘Trump Trots’ should probably replace Gish Gallop in the lexicon.

Perfect👌

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

The same could be said of Trump debating a seasoned Junior High Debate Club member.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Like a well done steak seasoned with ketchup?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Smeared across a wall in rage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

He’s going to use the same tactic and drown his opponent with do many lies and fake bullshit that they’ll spend most of the time trying to prove him wrong instead of taking about their platform.

permalink
report
reply
58 points
*

The gish gallop is remarkably effective- if you’re audience is a bunch of unserious, uncritical imbeciles.

Unfortunately, that’s basically the republican base;

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It’s really pathetic how many of them lack any critical thinking skills. They’re so enfranchised by the whole thing that they would rather lose friends and family over admitting a pedophile isn’t fit to lead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Unfortunately, that’s basically the republican base your average American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah, but Harris has seen that dumb tired move, and so far she’s been a judo master that has been using his own attacks against him.

There is a reason she wants the mics off for the debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

She wants them hot the whole time. T****s staffers want them off.

“We have told ABC and other networks seeking to host a possible October debate that we believe both candidates’ mics should be live throughout the full broadcast,” Brian Fallon, the Harris campaign’s senior adviser for communications, tells POLITICO. “Our understanding is that Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own. We suspect Trump’s team has not even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too embarrassing to admit they don’t think he can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute button.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The urge to cough “bullshit” at everything trump say will be hard.

I’m not sure it’s a trade off for him babbling over Harris the whole time. We already know he’s unpresidential. I kinda thought the were calling his bluff so he could skip the debate, because there’s really no point having a debate with a liar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Harris wants the mics on. She wants him to interrupt her with gibberish so she can shut him down with a firm “I’m talking!” and so she can call him out for his behavior. She’s banking on him making an ass of himself while she keeps her cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Hot mics and cage match or im not interested. “Omg it’s Harris with a steel chair!”

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Then Principal Waltz threw the Couch Fucker off hell in the cell and he plummeted 15 feet through the announcers table.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He was here briefly, but I believe went back to Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I heard he’s too much of a pussy to leave his mic on. Everybody’s saying it.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

He’s too much of a pussy to debate. He’ll back out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly, no way this is happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’d love for her to hit even harder.

“Trump wants out of the debate. I’d call him a pussy, but those things can take a pounding. Don’t know about the rest of you girls, but unlike Trump, my genitals don’t wilt at the slightest criticism.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments