89 points

Whenever you meet somebody who tells you that they’re against unions, join in with them. But focus on police unions only, go hard on their monopolization of violence. Be all in on Unions going away, because it would mean police would no longer have qualified immunity.

Watch their faces.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Unions aren’t the ones that are making qualified immunity a thing. It certainly helps their recruiting.

It’s the courts and, to a greater extent, the cities that hire them, that have allowed it to go on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Today I learned that 23% of the country have an IQ of that: 23

This totally brings to mind the anti labor and Union poster I saw for an airline where they said with your union dues within a couple of months you’ll be able to buy that PS5.

I’m like: motherfucker, I can buy that PS5 immediately and have money left over IN ONE PAYCHECK because I’m in a union.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I wonder why the figure is about union disapproval, seems strange to me.

“Thank you for participating in the survey! In your opinion, do you disapprove of unions that tend to do nothing but steal wages from hard-working American families’ pockets?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I work for a unionized airline and a lot of people bitch and moan that we have to pay dues roughly equal to 2% of our income. I always remind people that our non-unionized competitor pays their employees a flat 10% less than we get paid. So we make more, get union protection, and a ton of other benefits by being unionized. I have no problem paying union dues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I get anti-union propaganda in the mail. I’ve only gotten things a couple times, but I’ve always made sure to give them a call and let them know why I never want them to send anything to me ever again.

So gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My employer is negotiating with one of the unions right now, and they keep sending everyone email updates on the negotiations that very clearly are trying to get those of us that aren’t in a bargaining unit to feel annoyed at the union for asking for more in raises than the rest of us got. It’s having the opposite effect - it’s making us feel like upper management aren’t negotiating in good faith, and making me wish my position was eligible to be in the union

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

23 and me saw an opening in the market

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Being anti-union is the best asshole test.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

With very few exceptions. The police union in Chicago is a goddamn monster that needs to be broken up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I wish articles wouldn’t use double negatives like this.

Is “approval” at a 57 year low, or is “disapproval” low? Meaning, if disapproval is low, does that mean more people approve now?

I did read the article, by the way. I just feel like the wording could be better. I’m glad to see approval is so high. I wish access to unions was better.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I think approval and disapproval ratings are two different things that do not necessarily correlate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Neutral and ambivalent opinions also exist.

Saying “disapproval rate at all time low” paints a more complete picture than “approval or neutral opinion at all time high.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

does that mean more people approve now?

No. If you read the article, you’ll find that approval is slightly lower than in 2022.

Likewise, when polls report “Trump disapproval at all time high” it does not necessarily mean “Trump approval at all time low”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I literally said I read the article. It’s in my post. Maybe if you read my post instead of the first sentence, you’d realize what I dislike is the use of double-negatives generally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You read the article but asked a question that is answered in the third paragraph.

70% of Americans said they approved of unions, per Gallup’s most recent poll, conducted in August. That’s just one point shy of the record hit in 2022

And “disapproval hits 57-year low” is not a double negative, for the same reason “homelessness hits 57-year low” is not a double negative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Good! The reagan era brainwashed us to think unions are bad for employees and society. Unions are good for employees and society. They’re only bad for greedy fatcats capturing untold wealth.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Well, it’s also bad when greedy fat cats capture union management. Can’t ever get complacent yo

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments