144 points
*

It’s not even more aesthetic. Just more unified in branding.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

And the interface of their apps are still incoherent af. I don’t know how, but they manage to make things worse every time

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

It’s ok, they’ll just retire the service eventually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yeah, the old logos were all over the place. At first glance it’s not obvious they’re all Google apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

And? All of those being part of the same walled garden is a bug in the legal system not a feature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Better be explicit about the walled garden rather than being diffuse about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

To me, that’s just the case for camera and calendar. Maps is IMHO perfect (except the unnecessary G) and the red-and-white envelope is quite well-known.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think what really bothers me about the aesthetics is that the shapes are broken up by the coloration. For example, the pin icon for Google Maps looks almost like a hook, because the yellow has little contrast on this white background.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And that’s why I don’t really hate it. I hate Google, but I think it’s a neat design choice. I still hate Microsoft’s icon design a lot though, they can’t seem to stick with one thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whatever. It sucks ass is the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

My point is that it’s also ugly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I definitely find it more aesthetically pleasing. Just like the icon packs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points
*

i think they did need to unify the design and branding but i also agree they went too far with it. if they had only chosen 1-2 colors for each app icon that would have helped a lot.

gmail - red

drive - yellow

maps - green

meet - blue

calendar - lighter blue

problem solved

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Problem solved! If we ignore the world’s ~300 million colorblind people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

is that the one that says “fuck the color blind” because if so hey!! that’s not nice

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Beat me to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

i think they forgot to mention: they’re not all the same shape.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

True. Colorblind people come in all shapes and sizes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Except that the original post was contesting that those shapes are indistinguishable from each other. My point, therefore, is that the solution offered in the post I replied to would still be indistinguishable to 300 million people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The icoms would still have different shapes, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, it would just be the 🤣 emoji in different colors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which is how they are now

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yes, but the original post is suggesting that they’re ambiguous enough to all be squares. Running with that concept, making a bunch of squares different colors doesn’t fix the issue for those of us who can’t easily identify those colors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Most software pretty much doesn’t give a fuck about the visually impaired despite everyone talking big shit about accessibility. So I could certainly give a fuck what color someone’s logo is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

then what is your solution? do you expect them to redo their entire corporate branding palette?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nope. The icons are honestly good enough as they are, but the original post was being disingenuous in suggesting they’re no more distinguishable than squares.

Running with that logic, having each square a different color does not solve the problem for those of us who can’t easily distinguish those colors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

calendar - lighter blue

It’s called goluboy. In Russian at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

I wouldn’t even call this “aesthetics”. Rather “conceptual homogeneity” or something like that. It’s what happens when you strive for a uniform look over a useful or visually pleasing one.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Even uniformity can be aesthetically pleasing, but these icons are decidedly not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

In some countries uniform look at least provided good for society. In this case it provides only profits for to 1%.

Good for society:

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

The homogenization of these icons has been a long source of consternation for me.

They’re barely functional as icons; you can scroll right by them and miss them; which makes finding the apps in a list of apps a bit annoying sometimes. Removing each icon’s unique color scheme and replacing it with the ‘company 4 colors’ was the stupidest fucking idea ever.

Even more infuriating is how they keep renaming the applications to unexpected things every so often; so they move around; and it’s dreadfully annoying to remember if they prefixed the name of the app with a G or something else completely different, which renders strict alphabetical sorting a bit moot.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It can get even worse. My phone lets me do this to my icons which is ridiculous. I think this was opt-in but now that I’m going through my settings again I can’t actually figure out how to turn it off lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Long press the homescreen, wallpaper and style, themed icons

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

This is Material You icons; and this is basically not something you can opt out of…that I know of. You may want to find a different Launcher that allows you to load icon packs or disable that Material You behavior. (If yours doesn’t)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Just had to comment on your elegance and class good sir. Carry on!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Pardon; but I do happen to be a lady; thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Just had to comment on your elegance and class good sir ma’am. Carry on!

Yikes with the down votes sheesh. Some redditors snuck through!

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

I keep all my Google icons quarantined in one folder. Case in point:

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I use nova launcher. It allows you to replace any app icon by any png file. So you can download the old icons from the internet and use them on your phone. It’s a lot of work and I agree Google shouldn’t have done this, but at least you can revert it if you want to put in the effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I also use Nova Launcher and had no idea you could do that! Thanks for letting me know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Lol at the Photos icon. How does that in any way represent a photo or a camera? I guess it’s an iris shutter but that’s not something you notice too often on a real-life camera.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think it was flower at some point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I thought it was a shutter

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I can’t find photos on my phone without reading and I couldn’t find it in there either. I always click camera then go to photos from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ugh… feels dirty to even have most of those apps installed.

Of those I have Gmail, Translate, and YouTube. I would get rid of those if got decent iOS alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep, same here

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments