111 points

YT premium is a good value for me and my family. Guess I’m evil.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Literally Satan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Same. I watch more YouTube than probably any other streaming service. Plus I got the family plan and I sell the extra seats to my extended family and friends. Works out to be pretty cheap in the end.

I do the same for Spotify, Disney plus. Formally Netflix but they cut down on password sharing

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If you have YouTube premium, why do you have Spotify? YouTube music is comparable and better in some cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t pay for either but I use both and the youtube music desktop ui is really really bad. Plus the annoying thing of it often playing music videos instead of the normal song. I definitely like it better on mobile though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It definitely is better, but it sill has some stupid quirks that in some cases could probably be fixed by few lines of code, like not locking the screen when you are on the lyrics screen. It also is very slow to start-up in offline mode, which drives me nuts. But otherwise it is much better performant than Spotify and has better ways to listen to new music, instead of the dumb intelligent randomize feature on Spotify.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Honestly it’s the social aspect. Everyone I know uses Spotify, so sharing playlists and tracks are super easy. I know there’s converters out there but I can’t be arsed to do that every time I want to send or receive a link. I’ve also got some shared playlists between friends we all contribute to. At social gathering I can turn on the party mode or whatever it’s called and let people add stuff to the queue. The big one though is I’ve got a few friends with really good taste. I can check in on them from time to time to see what they’re listening to right now. Found a lot of great stuff this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I wish I could be as pleased with it. I don’t want to pay for a service and have that service still collect data on me to push ads elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Unfortunately that’s everything. Netflix, buying groceries with a credit card, even driving your new car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It doesn’t have to be this way. Somewhere in the past something went wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mate, you can’t use basically anything today then. Your car probably collects data on you. I’m not saying I love it, but life’s too short for me to cut everything trying to collect my data out of my life. Gotta pick and choose my battles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you block ads everywhere else then it doesn’t really matter. Pi.hole, AdGuard, proton vpn, Firefox will all block ads for you on pretty much every other site on the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

My 3 kids all use iPhone and we have a bunch of chrome casts. The only practical way to avoid the ads in YTP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

YouTube Poop?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your tight pants

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Newpipe

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t mind paying for good services, personally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah until it gets shot by A/B testing again lol. I love newpipe, but for somebody with a family it’s hard to justify, especially bc the non-techies of the fam are gonna want something that ‘just works’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

get a good adblocker and donate that money to them instead.

thatd probably be the best value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I do use an adblocker, and I’ll keep spending my money how I please, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

everyone can use their money for whatever stupid thing they please

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You subscribe to every single channel you watch on Patreon? That’s remarkable!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

paying for youtubers

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Paying for services?

Absolute evil.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Literally Hitler

permalink
report
parent
reply

“Absolute evil” is a bit of a stretch, but it’s YouTube/Google’s fault (by closing off and centralizing their video platform) that it is impossible to go elsewhere for videos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Google just made it really hard for creators to go anywhere else and created a monopoly of sorts.

Literally every corporation does or attempts to do the same thing. What we would need is to revive the politicians that broke up rockefellers empire and tell them to do the same with apple, microsoft, google, meta, amazon and every tech „giant”.

No more providing every imaginable service under one company.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Literally every corporation does or attempts to do the same thing.

Exactly. Every single corporation is evil and should be dismantled 🔥🔥🔥. This is just one of a thousand reasons to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I agree that YouTube is Google monopoly, but I I’ve been wondering… They handle massive amounts of data. Would any other non-trillion dollar company be even capable of storing, processing, and presenting videos on the same scale, with the same quality, and with what is arguably very good latency world wide?

What could competitors do to beat Google without hemorrhaging their money just trying the manage the overhead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t really understand how that’s YouTube’s fault. They created a good product so people used it and there were no alternatives when it got shit. There’s no lock in. They don’t force you off the platform if you post elsewhere (like twitch did). You can literally post the same video to as many platforms as you want. Sites like Instagram and GitHub have more lock in than YouTube does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

They created a good product so people used it and there were no alternatives when it got shit.

They created an inherently centralizing implementation of a video sharing platform. Even if it was done with good intentions (which it wasn’t, it was some capitalist’s hustle, and its social importance is a side effect), we should basically always condemn centralizing implementations of a given technology because they reinforce existing power structures regardless of the intentions of their creators.

It’s their fault because they’re a corporation that does what corporations do. Even when corporations try to do right by the world (which is an extremely generous appraisal of YouTube’s existence), they still manage to create centralizing technologies that ultimately serve to reinforce their existing power, because that’s all they can do. Otherwise, they would have set themselves up as a non-profit or some other type of organization. I refuse to accept the notion of a good corporation.

There’s no lock in. They don’t force you off the platform if you post elsewhere (like twitch did).

That’s a good point, but while there isn’t a de jure lock-in for creators, there is a de facto lock-in that prevents them from migrating elsewhere. Namely, that YouTube is a centralized, proprietary service, which can’t be accessed from other services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I mean this is every ecosystem though right? YouTube, Apple, Steam, everyone tries their best to do it because they want you locked in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t be disingenuous. We are already paying for that service, in our data and attention.

It would be an entirely different story if paying for Youtube Premium immediately opted you out of participating in Google’s data-mining and data-selling, and if paying for Youtube Premium removed not just the overt ads but the algorithmically-manipulated advertising content as well (what is the effective difference between a Pepsi ad and a Good Mythical Morning video titled “trying every new Pepsi flavor”?), but it since it DOESN’T do those then we aren’t talking about paying for a service - we are talking about a company asking for every penny in our wallet for a service which we are already paying for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

🙄

If paying for a service you use is the worst thing you can imagine, you really need to read the news at least once a decade.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Another happy customer of YouTube premium here. I canceled Netflix, never had Spotify. The only subscription I pay, worth it. The family plan works to 5 or 6 euros per person per month.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Same. I still feel the individual is worth it for me as YouTube is the bulk of content I watch. People also tend to forget that a portion of every subscription goes to the creators that you actually watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yea YTP individual isn’t worth it, but the family plan is (if you can fill the slots)

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Filling slots is how you make the family

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Seeing this comment, my mind thought in 3D and I saw like 12 perspectives of what you said😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Angry upvote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Remember when the big selling point of cable TV was no advertising? And then it became 99% ads?

Yeah.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

ummm I was born ~90 and I’ve always seen commercials. don’t take it the wrong way, but when were you born???

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Before the 90s. I think the best time for cable TV was between 1982 and 88. MTV wasn’t crap. The History Channel had actual history shows and the Discovery Channel always had top notch science shows. We also had “Night Flight” on “USA’s Up All Night.” They would run back to back episodes, starting at 9pm on Saturday nights and ending around 4-5am Sunday.

Anyone who remembers 80s cable TV should feel incredibly ripped off by what they’re showing today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I remember these days. Cable felt really special. Then the ads, and every channel became reality TV and less about what the channels original purpose was. TLC is all trash TV, History is all ancient aliens and conspiracy theories now. YouTube sorta has brought that back, but for me the premium subscription is too expensive. I have a subscription to Nebula where a lot of YT creators have channels and it costs far more reasonable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

So, you’re actually viewing the past with rose tinted glasses here. There was never a time when basic cable was completely ad free. There was certain channels that started ad free, and some like HBO only ever showed ads for their own content, but there was always ads. TV now is very different and arguably worse, but not for that reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments