4 points

the video was scheduled to go live online at 1 p.m. Wednesday.

Seeing this at quarter past the hour I went to look for it at the ndp.ca website. It does not appear to be there. I followed the link to their youtube channel. Not there either. Presumably it’s on fucking twitter or something. Please do better, NDP.

Anyway, the video can be seen at cpac.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

"Justin Trudeau has proven again and again he will always cave to corporate greed. The Liberals have let people down

Can’t argue with that. I’m worried though. I’ll vote NDP but I have a bad feeling Conservatives will win.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

They are going to try the old Biden Harris switcheroo…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s practically a Canadian tradition to swap out an unpopular party leader as either a sacrifice or a rebrand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kim Campbell has entered the chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But with who?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Weirdly enough, Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mark Carney?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

At least that means a less conservative (ie LPO) Ontario premier…

But with the US electing swinging to what we laughably refer to as the left, I wonder if it could cause the CPC trouble in the upcoming election. Could hope for a coalition government…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Tories will be even pissier than usual if there was a legit coalition government, hell it’s even in the wording of what Pierre sent Jagmeet, that the s&c is propping up something that wasn’t elected and the like, literally the same shit they did back in the Harper years.

Shocking, a Harper minister sounding like Harper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He’ll govern like Harper too, like Harper if he grew up on 4chan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But with the US electing swinging to what we laughably refer to as the left, I wonder if it could cause the CPC trouble in the upcoming election.

No. We lag behind the US’s shifts here, which is why it’s important to PP to get the election rolling before the year is out. While he’d still probably win an election next year, in all likelihood it would be a much smaller victory should the Yankees actually send any kind of message rebuking the naked fascists running this year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At least that means a less conservative (ie LPO OLP) Ontario premier…

Eh, I’m not sure Crombie is much less conservative than Ford. I feel if she becomes Premier, we’re going to have to wait another cycle of shifting right-then-left until we have a chance at an actual progressive government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I think it is certainly arguable, it’s fairly standard political hyperbole. Singh must remember not three months ago Bill c_58 came into effect, banning scabs (replacement workers) from being brought in during a strike or lock out.

The claim “proven again and again he will always cave to corporate greed” is, frankly, demonstrably false.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Bans scabs.

Forces arbitration.

(Polinever is still a shit face baby nazi weasel)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Yes, they did, and it’s arguable still. Given how many downstream jobs and the lives attached to them would be hurt by a sustained lock out of our dual member rail oligopoly I think binding arbitration is a preferrable option.

Binding arbitration is often opposed by both employers and employees, for different reasons. Amongst employers it’s because Canadian arbitrators don’t take ability to pay / fund into consideration when determining compensation and benefit changes, and so actually favor employees more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Polinever is still a shit face baby nazi weasel

Yes, and while I am a liberal who generally supports the Liberals in Canada, I absolutely will vote to keep Pierre out of power, whatever that means at the time. I have no real animosity with social democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

"Justin Trudeau has proven again and again he will always cave to corporate greed. The Liberals have let people down

Lil’ PP will show us how THAT’s done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Hopefully that will encourage voters to see them as a viable alternative to Liberals and Conservatives.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Defintly seems to be alluding to breaking the rail strike, which is a big deal.

I really worry this will result in a conservative government, however the Liberals cant take the NDP support for granted.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

I’m hopeful the LPC will maintain confidence through their term with NDP support, in absense of the formal agreement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Agreed. I’m hoping this is just a shot across the bow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Strategically, this a move that I think shows to the Canadian labour bloc, that actions like what the Liberal minister did to the rail workers don’t go without consequences. Singh can harp on, consoling and hugging union leaders if he wants but rescinding the agreement is one big step above just talk that is within the NDP’s power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

for sure.

It definitly has a Catch 22, because I dont want to see a snap election, I think the conservitives have too much a chance of forming a government, and as rough as the Liberals can be, the conservitives would be far worse… but we can’t have the NDP just being unwavering support for the Liberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think that the majority of voters will look past what happened to the rail workers. It’s not a labour issue many understand or hear about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Singh had many reasonable opportunities to do this over the last few years, but finally pulls the rip cord when the Conservatives are polling way ahead? What the fuck? He’s such a useless piece of shit, why do the NDP keep him around

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yeah, I thought selecting him for leader was bad years ago, but it’s obvious now that he can’t really do much of anything. Guess we’d better prep for 4 years of conservative austerity since our electoral system is broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

We will be lucky to get away with 4 years. A generation of young men is being swayed conservative in the smoke pits of the internet and I’m worried we’ll suffer a lost decade of governance by bumper sticker weirdos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It kinda looks like PP goaded him into it with the timing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think it’s less of “goaded him into it” and more of “predicted it”. As others have pointed out, messing with unions is a red-line for the NDP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s because of the rail labour dispute. The NDP can’t/won’t be party to cutting down unions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Doing it when the Liberals are in really bad shape improves the odds of the NDP winning, up from 0.0 to 0+ε.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jagmeet is decent. Its the voters who are complete shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To paraphrase Terry Pratchett, once you think the problem is that you have the wrong kind of people, you shouldn’t be a leader

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And how does that apply to me?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Regions

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments

Community moderators