52 points

Getting the old gang back together! Too bad Russia is on the other side this time.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

They’ve always been “that acquaintance”.

You only know each other for mutual benefit or a mutual friend, but when that’s gone, there becomes literally no reason to hang out any more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Considering Russia’s past performance in naval warfare in the Pacific, we’re probably better off without them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Getting the old gang back together!

Germany, Japan, and Italy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I don’t mean to pick on you specifically with this comment, but good lord people, there’s more to history than WW2. Anytime anyone tries to make a historical reference to current events it’s awkwardly shoehorned into a WW2 framework. It drives me crazy. Anyway, sorry for the rant there. No, it’s an older gang. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_China

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Ah, you’re talking about colonialism. You’re going to have a hard time finding anti-colonialists on Lemmy, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The fact that Russia was ever on the winning side given their history was a fluke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Eh, they were also instrumental in defeating Napoleon, which counts for a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Russia was always on another side. The Ribbentrop Pact was a weak, untrusting handshake between two barbaric regimes with mutual hatred and a shared realization it would be easier to go rape and pillage more peaceful people instead of each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Please see my reply to UnderpantsWeevil

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

you mean the nazi gang?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

2024 - 22 = 2002.
So probably not nazis. No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
First Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for First Post:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - India
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.firstpost.com/world/german-warships-to-cross-taiwan-strait-for-first-time-in-22-years-defying-beijings-warnings-13812905.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
-51 points

There would be outrage if China sailed warships through the Baltic and North seas, or the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean sea. Or if China had a strong military presence in Russia, Belarus, Cuba, and Venezuela etc.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Baltic and North seas, or the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean sea

None of these are contested territories. Chinese vessels go there all the time and nobody really cares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Would it though? They did sail in baltics and the gulf

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That you think there would be outrage highlights your lack of understanding.

International waters are just so. It’s only a problem when a country decides to try and restrict access to international waters, and one way to show that this decision is not accepted is to sail warships through it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-52 points

Yeah… as a german taxpayer this is exactly what we need now. Poke China for no real reason.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

You’re either with Taiwan or you’re with the Terrorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The hexbear tankies will get upset at this comment 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s okay, their opinions don’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We’ve got bigger fish to fry at home. My government is actively fueling a genocide in Gaza and doing business with a shitton of other genocidal countries, so virtue signalling with our military by crossing some random strait in east Asia doesn’t make me feel any better about anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Okay, but can you at least admit that China is doing a genocide against Muslims and that we need to wage a holy war to end their tyrannical communist rein and restore a godly liberal democracy to their shores?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Terrorists?!! You mean people you disagree with?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep but if you think that word is too biased you can also call them communists, climate activists or snowflakes. Which one you pick depends solely on your own mood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The word “terrorist” has an incredible power to shut off people’s brains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, me disagreeing with them locking people up over social media posts criticizing them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

A threat to the existence of our people and a future for our children

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Would you rather encourage Chinese aggression and show them your country can be bullied around?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I’d rather my country not get involved in these superficial platitudes as long as they keep funding aggression in other parts of the globe. If they didn’t fund such aggressions, then I wouldn’t mind, but as of now, it only looks like pathetic virtue signalling to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Funding aggression”. Lol. No wonder Germany got fucked in the ass by Russia and China so many times with such bootlickers among the voting population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-71 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
39 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 269K

    Comments