It is on.

150 points

signed “Childless Cat Lady.”

permalink
report
reply
81 points

Now the MAGA people are mad that they can’t use their AI pictures anymore and pretend they are real.

Sad MAGA face 😡

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

Why are right wing parties obsessed with AI posters? And like HORRIFICALLY BAD AI posters? They’re creepy as hell. In my country too, it’s just unsettling. I guess it’s easier than a photoshoot and allows you to make any obscene shit you want… Or just straight up lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I think you already answered your own question there. GenAI makes it really easy to flood a platform with loads of bullshit, and as a consequence make any point seem (at least somewhat) believable

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Doing it themselves would take both effort and creativity, as well as time. AI lets them vomit out tons ot nonsense with little effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

lmao at the haters in the comments pretending they don’t know who she is

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Especially after the GOP literally pulled her into the spotlight over the subject https://newrepublic.com/post/177990/fox-news-conspiracy-theory-taylor-swift-psyop

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Right? The neckiest of beards have crawled out of the shadows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I would have lost that bet…

permalink
report
reply
72 points
*

why, she endorsed biden in 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Yeah I actually thought she wouldn’t ever officially do it unless it was being timed and pre planned to occur just after the debate in order to have maximum impact. Which - I would guess that it was. Not that it’s a bad thing.

Anyway I didn’t think she would because I’m certain she lost some fans tonight - deciding to step into this race in such a major way. And the cynic in me thought she was more interested in money and wouldn’t risk her image. I’m glad I was wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

i mean she endorsed biden in 2020, why would kamala be so much different?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Wait she did? Wow I have a lot to learn about Taylor Swift. Okay I would have definitely deserved to lose that bet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I think she can afford to lose a few fans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

She endorsed Biden in 2020. There are no fans that didn’t understand her political leanings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I actually thought she wouldn’t ever officially do it unless it was being timed and pre planned to occur just after the debate in order to have maximum impact.

After the AI image ordeal she released a statement saying “for the safety of her fans” and being mid-tour she wouldn’t release a statement until after he tour ended…which coincidentally was after the election.

Maybe she got some blowback because that would be the coward’s way out (publicly denounce the orange turd if he lost, or just make it a minor, non-issue if he won), but also being more concerned with the $$ her tour makes by staying out of it.

I’m glad she nutted up and chose a side in this and has some sway with her non-tween rapid fan base. It certainly won’t make me atart listening to her music though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-60 points

Wonder who she actually supports. And who her bf supports

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Acting like she didn’t endorse Biden four years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Banking on the following comments from the right, which they use for every artist’s endorsement:

They’re a has been washed up. Who even is this person? Guess I can cross him/her off my list I don’t even know who this person is, what does it matter? This won’t move the needle at all They should keep their options out of politics When is the last time this person has been relevant? Of course they would, all actors/actresses/artists are blue

Spin the ol wheel and let’s see what we land on.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Don’t forget that old standard, “She should shut up and sing!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They should keep their options out of politics

And the same people who said that are the ones who love kid rock or the other motor city nutball whose concerts are nothing but right wing bs

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Good luck calling Taylor Swift a has-been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m pretty sure they’ll try. It’s not like being factually correct is a core part of their brand.

Anyway the point isn’t how the fascs will react but that it’ll energize some voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I really don’t think Trump is gaining any voters at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I bet they’d also say if a pop star is influential on your political opinions, you’re a damn moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The party who elected a movie star? Surely they’d never be so hypocritical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Twice… if you count Trump as a movie star.

Reagan is somehow remembered for lowering taxes even, when taxes were actually higher for most people* when he left office.

(*It was a little lower for corporations and the wealthy.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Well, I’m not sure cameo appearances qualify “movie star.”

And maybe they wouldn’t be that insightful. Either way, it’s a silly notion. We certainly should put weight in the political opinions of pop stars. Queen Latifahs endorsement of Biden is what swayed my vote.

Edit: So… Everyone agrees pop stars political opinions are important? It’s ok that Queen Latifahs swayed my vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments