The presence of hard-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer alongside Donald Trump on the campaign trail in recent days has raised questions, including from some Republicans, about the influence the controversial former congressional candidate may have on him.
Ms Loomer is well-known for her anti-Muslim rhetoric and for spreading conspiracy theories, including that the 9/11 attacks were an “inside job” carried out by the US government.
She joined Trump at an event on Wednesday commemorating the attacks, raising eyebrows and prompting outrage in some US media outlets.
…
Now, she is known for her vocal support of Trump and for promoting a long string of conspiracy theories including claims that Kamala Harris is not black, and that the son of billionaire George Soros was sending cryptic messages calling for Trump’s assassination.
These posts led her to be banned from a number of platforms including Facebook, Instagram and even, according to her, Uber and Lyft for making offensive comments about Muslim drivers. She once described herself as a “proud Islamophobe”.
Wasn’t it Laura Loomer, who started the whole Kamala gave BJs to get to her position? I guess it was truly just projection.
Still gross to make that accusation about someone as reprehensible as Loomer. And it let’s Trump off the hook. She’s not traveling with him because of sexual favors, she’s traveling with him because he supports her insane views.
The pictures of her with Mango Musalini make it look like they’re sharing more than just a political viewpoint.
accusation
Every accusation IS an admission of guilt with Republicans, without exception.
“Traveling” 🤨
Walmart Stormfront
I am really good at recognizing faces but every time I see a new pic of this lady I’m, “who the fuck is this?”
But the answer seems to be, a racist asshole.
To be fair, with all the work she’s had done she probably does look different every time you see her.
Her face is fascinatingly odd and . . upsetting.
Born in Arizona in 1993, the self-styled investigative journalist has worked as an activist and commentator for organisations including Project Veritas and Alex Jones’s Infowars.
BBC, don’t get played, man. That restraint you show with “self-styled” is just creaking terribly. Personally I would have gone with “considers herself” or “claims to be . . . despite [the obvious]”. Yeah yeah “objective”, look whatever you gotta tell yourself, man.
Self-styled means “that’s what she calls herself”. Otherwise they would not include the qualifier.
She’s he’s new cock socket. We all know it and see it. But the evangelical Christians will explain it away.
