The woman behind an early Facebook post that helped spark baseless rumors about Haitians eating pets told NBC News that she feels for the immigrant community.

The woman behind an early Facebook post spreading a harmful and baseless claim about Haitian immigrants eating local pets that helped thrust a small Ohio city into the national spotlight says she had no firsthand knowledge of any such incident and is now filled with regret and fear as a result of the ensuing fallout.

“It just exploded into something I didn’t mean to happen,” Erika Lee, a Springfield resident, told NBC News on Friday.

Lee recently posted on Facebook about a neighbor’s cat that went missing, adding that the neighbor told Lee she thought the cat was the victim of an attack by her Haitian neighbors.

Newsguard, a media watchdog that monitors for misinformation online, found that Lee had been among the first people to publish a post to social media about the rumor, screenshots of which circulated online. The neighbor, Kimberly Newton, said she heard about the attack from a third party, NewsGuard reported.

168 points
*

“I didn’t mean to be a terrible racist person and (possibly) get people killed. I just wanted to be casually racist.”

Edit: added (possibly)

permalink
report
reply
73 points

She actually said:

“I’m not a racist,” she said through heavy emotion, adding that her daughter is half Black and she herself is mixed race and a member of the LGBTQ community. “Everybody seems to be turning it into that, and that was not my intent.”

Lee said she pulled her daughter out of school and is now worried about her safety with so much attention on her family. She is also concerned for the safety of the Haitian community, which she said she did not intend to villainize en masse.

“I feel for the Haitian community,” she said. “If I was in the Haitians’ position, I’d be terrified, too, worried that somebody’s going to come after me because they think I’m hurting something that they love and that, again, that’s not what I was trying to do.”

These aren’t the words of some MAGA devotee, she seems pretty genuine on this and I don’t see any reason not to believe her. I instead blame those who have purposefully worsened and spread this rumor for racist ends. Imagine if you made an offhand post on Lemmy that inadvertently spun up a rumor that reached a fucking presidential.debate, I bet you’d be caught pretty off guard by that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

“I’m not a racist,” she said through heavy emotion, adding that her daughter is half Black and she herself is mixed race and a member of the LGBTQ community. “Everybody seems to be turning it into that, and that was not my intent.”

None of that means you can’t be racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It certainly doesn’t. But in the absence of evidence in either direction, I think it’s most reasonable to not assume the worst of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Lee recently posted on Facebook about a neighbor’s cat that went missing, adding that the neighbor told Lee she thought the cat was the victim of an attack by her Haitian neighbors.

Nah, someone who wasn’t racist would have known not to spread your crazy neighbor’s theories that are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If she had left off the Haitian part, it would just be typical crazy Nextdoor stuff. That she felt that had to be included suggests something. Maybe not MAGA level, but there’s some specifics not being said. Hell, she may not even consider herself biased, yet she sees those Haitians as different enough to single them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Sorry but are you excusing a person who literally made up the racist shit for no reason just because her apology didn’t sound republican to you and other people blew her lie up further than she “claims” to have not wanted it to be?

That’s like sorry I set this building on fire, I was just trying to burn this one desk but didn’t mean for it to spread and kill a bunch of innocent people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Have you seen what she actually wrote, and if yes, can you share? I think we should set the actual message before casting judgement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Have people been killed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

We shouldn’t wait until it gets to that point. Look at the past, plenty of racism examples to work from that became violent. What really makes it worse is that Trump, Vance, and others are doubling down on the mistake, fanning flames that should have just been a one day “that’s stupid”. They want violence, it helps their cause, excites their base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And somehow it will make trump right instead of wrong, at least in his own mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Not yet, and I hope not. I’m worried this will (figuratively) explode into something like the recent UK protests/riots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“I didn’t (allegedly) mean to be a terrible racist person and (possibly) get people killed. I just (allegedly) wanted to be casually racist.”

ftfy

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

This lady, apparently

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Expressing concern for a missing animal in a local post is not the same as spreading false rumours with racism. I’d want to see her post before judging. I also respect her talking to the media about regret and misuse of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

Her post is incredibly racist hearsay from 3 people removed (her neighbor’s daughter’s friend). It describes a vile act that casts fault on 20k people in her local community.

Shes expressing remorse because she did something vile and racist and now has everyone in the world looking at her and her actions.

She doesn’t have anything to gain like Trump/Vance, so shes afraid she will have consequences in her life now that her racism and hate is so public. After the multiple days of bomb threats that have cleared local schools and city Hall, the fear has set in.

That’s it. She didn’t apologize out of a sense of decency or remorse. Her apology is:

“Well I’m biracial and gay, so I can’t be racist.”

“I also didn’t realize this hate would go national, and now that the world is attacking these people and might attack me, I realize what I did was wrong.”

“I’m so scared what I did will affect me, please don’t let it.”

That’s not remorse. That’s someone running from the ugly thing they did, hoping to escape any consequence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Agreed.

This sounds more like “sorry I got caught” than “I acknowledge it was wrong to have thought or said that”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yeah, that appears pretty racially motivated. Still, the article dances around it, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it was clickbait. I assume that is her post?

The story about neighbours daughters friend just reads as plausible deniabikity to post horrid stuff. She had to type all this out purposefully. Its not a retweet ir share or a sentence. Its a narrative shes creating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Just want to point out that this woman made a mistake and expressed remorse.

The guy who’s trying to be pres, deliberately and knowingly stoked this fire for his own benefit.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

She’s not expressing remorse, she’s selfishly scared for herself.

Remorse requires accountability, not excuses and projection.

She made a racist, hateful, hearsay statement and now that it might affect her she says she can’t be hateful because she’s “gay and biracial.” That’s the definition of dodging accountability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

“But I’m gay and biracial”

“Oh, I had no idea. Do whatever you want all of the time.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Out of curiosity, what would accountability look like to you, in this case. Since she’s admitted guilt she’s likely to be held at least partially responsible for the crimes of others if it’s found her racist claim played a part in the crimes motivation. I assume she’s likely to lose her job as well, but we’ll have to wait and see i suppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I like your question! To me it starts with a real apology without excuses. Real apologies are generally short and put one in a vulnerable situation, like

“I’m sorry for spreading these lies, they aren’t true and I did it from a place of ignorance”

No “I didn’t mean to,” no “I’m not racist, I’m mixed,” and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She needs to at least apologize believably.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The cat was also gay and a mixed breed, so unfortunately that cancels out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

She got caught in the act and is scared for her own self. She’d keep posting this stuff otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Damage already done. But I’m happy to see she’s sorry.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

I think she’s sorry she was caught

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep.

Classic nopology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Who knew that there would be finding out associated with all the fucking around.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 523K

    Comments