Admiral Rob Bauer, who serves as the principal advisor to NATO’s secretary general, also said that nations supplying weapons to Kyiv have the right to limit their use.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/aZWt4

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.euronews.com%2F2024%2F09%2F15%2Fnato-chair-backs-ukraines-use-of-long-range-weapons-to-strike-inside-russia

I’d say we’re about to enter the cool zone, but I feel like we’ve been here for a while. Guess we’re entering the cool zone’s cool zone.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points
*

Very unlikely. There was a possibility early on that Putin would decide to go out with a fiery bang of glory, but time passed and nothing happened. He might threaten use of nukes, but won’t actually use them for fear of retaliation. The whole fucking point of nuclear weapons was deterrence until the brain-dead US decided to actually use them. One can hope the world learned their lesson.

permalink
report
parent
reply

There was a possibility early on that Putin would decide to go out with a fiery bang of glory,

When? That sounds like a very silly assessment

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When he was hiding in a bunker from his own people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I mean how cool can it get? Sunglasses at night in a Ferrari submersed in an Olympic swimming pool?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

nations supplying weapons to Kyiv have the right to limit their use

What a pathetic statement. “We’re going to encourage Ukraine to start WW3 and then hand the responsibility to the individual states.”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What an absolute dumb view of this entire situation. Was it the paint chips or the microplastics that got you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How did Ukraine start “ww3”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

The moment a US made and supplied missile lands in Moscow, you might just see how.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That missile would have never gotten there if Russia didn’t reach outside of their borders.

The only one escalating this conflict is Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I can’t believe Ukraine launched an unprovoked full scale invasion of Russia on February 24, 2022. Wait a minute, that’s not quite right is it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The US: This is the most important election of your entire life and if you vote wrong there will never be another election

Also the US: ensures there will never be another election anywhere by starting world war 3

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Who invaded who?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*

The Russian Army is just removing Nazi influence from the Ukraine, Russian civilians did nothing wrong. No Ukrainian civilians have been killed, it’s all lies from the Nazis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

LMAO

Tankies rlly r delusional, huh

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How can the Russian Army be removing Nazi influence, when the influence comes directly from the Russian government?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why are they interfering in another country’s military? Under what authority?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yikes. Get out of your bubble dude. We have literal footage of civilian buildings being bombed, filmed by regular people. We have video footage of Russian tanks swerving to intentionally run over cars with people in them.

I know this won’t convince you, but honestly, it’s upsetting that people are like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Also the US: ensures there will never be another election anywhere by starting world war 3

Russia pressed the WW3 button almost 3 years ago. We’re just taking our time getting to the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

*NATO *10 years ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

But was this ever a question? The problem was if they can use “gifted” weaponry for this purpose.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

By international law they can use weapons supplied by other nations even for long range strikes into Russia yes, to my knowledge it’s just a gentleman’s agreement that they follow the terms of the nation supplying them. Not really a point of contention though as it would be idiotic to violate those terms at risk of not being supplied anymore.

The only point of contention is whether supplying nations should decide to allow strikes into Russia with their equipment because Russia continues to threaten that it would see that as an act of war from the supplying nation. So legally nothing wrong with it but you have to weigh that decision with possibility of starting World War III or a nuclear apocalypse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right, like I said. So no news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Of course they do. That’s what happens when you invade someone, the someone you invade also hits back at you.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

In fact this is basically the only way for the war to end. By capturing Russian territory Russia now has a reason to come to negotiations to just call everything off to get their land back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

By capturing Russian territory Russia now has a reason to come to negotiations to just call everything off to get their land back.

Ukraine captured land in kursk and this did not cause the Russians to come to the negotiating table, nor signal that they will weaken their demands. In fact, they simply started taking land even faster in Ukraine because Ukraine had committed resources into kursk instead of the front lines.

All it goes to show is that westerners have a complete non-understanding of this war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We have a strategy-god here everybody!

“Westerners” have a great understanding of this war. You cannot win a war by just defending your land from your own land.

Fuck russian terrorist shitheads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Russia is just lucky the land is tied down or the farmers would have towed it back home…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Same applies for Palestinians, Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam. You’d be totally fine with that.

right? right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Absolutely! Imperialism is bad when Russia does it, and when American/Israel does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Imagine thinking you got Lemmy by suggesting that Vietnam should have counter invaded America

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Nonono you’re not supposed to have principles, you’re supposed to just pick sides instead otherwise ‘what about USA’ won’t work as a gotcha. Just think of the poor tankies, whatabout USA is all they have, would you really tankie that away from them?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators