So, not only is he ignorant to what “AI” is, he’s thinking everyone else is as well? 🤣🤡

112 points

I’m not going to get into the minutia of how someone manufactured this

No, baby, you’re gonna have to get into it. This is not a deepfake image, this is your posting history. We can see the whole record of it. If someone manufactured the evidence, they’ve been planning it for decades.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Yeah. It’s not like someone thought, in 2008, that this particular black guy guy would eventually be running for governor as the major party candidate on a platform based on bigotry and re-electing a convicted criminal as President.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Mr. Robinson, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

I mean that’s why Trump likes the guy, for now

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Fuck his soul. He deserves zero mercy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s a line from the movie Billy Madison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Which I quoted this just today!

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

“Someone put shit in my pants!”

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Ted Nugent is that you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

This is the other half of the problem with deep fakes.

People can fake awful shit, sure, and be convincing. The other half is that people can pass awful shit off as being fake.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Sure, but this wasn’t an image of TSwift with a MAGA 2024 shirt on that was AI generated.

This is years, over a decade, of post histories tied to his IP address with his own profile picture on these sites that was registered a long, long time ago.

Speaking as someone who works heavily with AI in the Software Engineering community, there’s no way today to get AI to do this.

Definitely no way to fake the server logs across multiple groups as well as the IP access logs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Exactly. He’s passing his awful shit off as fake.

Or trying to, anyway. Not saying he’s competent. Just awful,

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nevermind that concocting some of these screenshots would be so easily done with basic HTML that without backing proof they’d mean nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Kaczynski asked for clarification about how Robinson believed Stein embedded comments published over a five-year period from 2008 to 2013.

Was it a time travelling AI? Generative AI wasn’t much of a thing in 2008-2013.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That damn T-1000 looking for John Connor just couldn’t help himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments