224 points

The exchange:

Mehdi Hasan: We looked at your social media, and you haven’t done that many posts specifically calling out Russian attacks on civilian areas. You haven’t called Vladimir Putin a war criminal, but you have called Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal.

Jill Stein: No, actually, we did. Yeah. In my very first remarks about the Ukraine war, we condemned —

Mehdi Hasan: Vladimir Putin is a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Yes, we did condemn —

Mehdi Hasan: And Bashar al-Assad is a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Yes, in so many words, yes, we have said as much.

Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one, which I think he is.

Jill Stein: Oh, absolutely.

Mehdi Hasan: Is Putin a war criminal?

Jill Stein: So what we said about Putin was that his invasion of Ukraine is a criminal and murderous war.

Mehdi Hasan: And he’s a war criminal who should be on trial?

Jill Stein: Well, by implication.

Mehdi Hasan: You’re struggling here to say something very simple. This is why people have their doubts about you with Russia. Why is Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal but not Vladimir Putin?

Jill Stein: Well, as John F. Kennedy said, “We must not negotiate out of fear and we must not fear to negotiate.” So if you want to be an effective world leader, you don’t start by name calling and hurling out that.

Mehdi Hasan: So how will President Stein negotiate with Israel then, if you’ve called Netanyahu a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Well, because he very clearly is a war criminal.

Mehdi Hasan: Oh, so Putin clearly isn’t a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Well, we don’t have a decision, put it this way, by the International Criminal Court.

Mehdi Hasan: Yes, we do. Yes, actually, actually, you’re wrong. There’s an arrest warrant for Putin and there isn’t an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, so why is Putin not a war criminal, but Netanyahu is?

Jill Stein: Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu. He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.

Mehdi Hasan: No disagreement from me at all. It still doesn’t answer my question. Whether we sponsor them or not is irrelevant.

Jill Stein: With Russia it’s far more complicated.

Mehdi Hasan: Either you’re a war criminal or you’re not. Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?

Jill Stein: In so many words, yes he is.

Mehdi Hasan: I don’t know “what so many words” — Butch [Ware, Stein’s running mate], is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Let me say that whatever you think he is —

Mehdi Hasan: It’s not about what I think. I’m asking you. You’re running for President.

Jill Stein: If you want to pull him back, if you are a world leader, you don’t begin your conversation by calling someone a war criminal unless you have a…

Mehdi Hasan: So why have you called Biden and Netanyahu war criminals?

Jill Stein: Because we have a clear strategy and we have very strong support across the world.

How is it more complicated, Jill? The lady doth protest too much

permalink
report
reply
166 points

Would be nice if more politicians were subjected to dogged follow-up questions like this. Instead the press just lets them deflect and ramble and change the subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

Mehdi Hasan is from the UK and that’s how they do political interviews in Britain. Like you, I wish we did it in the U.S.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Interviewers in the US are all about themselves. Making themselves look good and preening in front of the camera. Dogging a recalcitrant subject with repeated questions is a bad look for them. Plus it convinces potential interviewees to stay away!

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

He did the same thing to an Israeli spokesperson, and then MSNBC fired him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I wish every interviewer were even half as good at this as Mehdi Hassan is. He is a delight to watch or read when he’s talking to anyone who is dodging questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Even if you don’t get an answer, it’s good to keep at it long enough that it’s obvious they’re avoiding it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair, the rambling did make the latest presidential debate very watchable compared to previous ones 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It was Harris that made it more watchable. And Trump taking the bait was sad but at least there was schadenfreude. But the rambling was an absolute fucking travesty, it should still be considered a national damn crisis that the idiot is even a serious candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

i really need more people to be aware this is who jill stein has always been. she focuses on the liberatory language of green politics but in practice is a fascist. there are two ways to view this. either she’s an idiot who thinks she can deal with putin, or she knows exactly what she’s doing and is in favor giving a genocidal maniac more power because it benefits her personally

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

She’s a grifter so it really would not surprise me to learn that she’s taken daddy putin’s propoganda dollars.

Remember how she raised a bunch of money in 2016 to do a recount and then never did? Yeah. That’s what grifting looks like. She had no legal way to actually accomplish the task she was fundraising for which is every bit as bad a selling someone snake oil.

She and the green party exist solely to extract money out of credulous idiots who buy the lie that voting for her does anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s always amusing seeing her fans try to explain this photo without suggesting she’s pro-Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

She and the green party exist solely to extract money out of credulous idiots who buy the lie that voting for her does anything.

I want to copy this phrase and reply to every single post mentioning her as an alternative to voting for Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This has strong “the front fell off” vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

another Green voter got very agitated when called out for pushing only Russia’s talking points in this debate:

https://www.youtube.com/live/wR4l5BWWzCQ?t=5010

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Can I get a timestamp?

Edit: my bad, embedded browser didn’t preserve the url timestamp. 1:23:30

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

didn’t realise these 2 had history, lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l203PI-SXc

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Why was the reporter asking her tough follow up questions? It doesn’t match what I usually see. Is Jill Stein bad because she can’t afford to pay for easier interviews? For real though, I wish every “big name” was treated this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Agreed. Politicians are so insulated now from actual tough interviews

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

part of the problem is psychological in nature. it’s flattering when a powerful person makes time for you, no matter how vile they are. polǐicians have been gaming this ever since the advent of mass media. jill stein here got the treatment all our politicians should be because this is an interviewer with a track record of doing this better than many, but also because jill stein is an unserious candidate. the perception is less “wow, she made time for me,” and more, “what else would she be up to”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s Medhi Hassan. He’s a serious interviewer, and he’s tough with every politician he interviews if they aren’t answering questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m no fan of Stein. I was years ago, but not anymore. But she seems very clear in the beginning, then equivocates in the middle then clarifies (kinda) towards the end— but the way the interviewer goes after her seems like she’s being evasive in a way that doesn’t come across in the textual reading.

Is there an audio and/or video clip of this interview?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If you don’t mind Twitter, yes.

https://x.com/mehdirhasan/status/1835761859838038350

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Thanks for the link, but I deleted my account years ago. No worky for me.

If anyone could link something else, I’d be quite grateful. 👍

Edit: here’s a link:

https://xcancel.com/mehdirhasan/status/1835761859838038350

Also— I don’t read her as being so much pro-putin as she is trying to be “stateswoman” and also being terribly unprepared. Just a total flop. She seemed like she was trying to be very reasonable, and she was just destroyed by the interviewer who was unrelenting on a single question that she was not prepared to answer.

I’m not apologizing for her. It was probably the one and only question she should have been prepared to answer right off the bat. And how she fumbled it was extremely damaging to her.

She did answer, but her answer got lost in the mess of it all. And that interviewer was being a very aggressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

Yeah she explicitly said “yes” multiple times. I don’t like her, but this is garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Unless she can say the words ‘Putin is a war criminal’ she is avoiding the question. “In so many words” is not a yes. I understand she follows with yes he is, but why can’t she just say yes, Putin is a war criminal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Because with the other 4 world leaders she said a simple, “yes.” Every single time she was asked about Putin it was either a “yes…” followed by a qualification or a hedged answer that wasn’t a yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’m not so sure. I think that I’d need to hear/see the interview to know the tone/context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wow, Jill comes off like a jackass in that interview. Shouldn’t be surprised I guess the Greens have become useful idiots for those trying to manipulate the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Fuck, that’s horrible. And this woman consistently manages to drive hundreds of thousands of votes from the Democrat candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points
*

Jill Stein: So what we said about Putin was that his invasion of Ukraine is a criminal and murderous war.

Mehdi Hasan: And he’s a war criminal who should be on trial?

Jill Stein: Well, by implication.

Mehdi Hasan: You’re struggling here to say something very simple. This is why people have their doubts about you with Russia. Why is Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal but not Vladimir Putin?

???

What does “by implication” mean to Hasan?

Jill Stein: Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu. He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.

Mehdi Hasan: No disagreement from me at all. It still doesn’t answer my question. Whether we sponsor them or not is irrelevant.

Jill Stein: With Russia it’s far more complicated.

Mehdi Hasan: Either you’re a war criminal or you’re not. Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?

Jill Stein: In so many words, yes he is.

So they’re in agreement. Right?

Mehdi Hasan: I don’t know “what so many words” — Butch [Ware, Stein’s running mate], is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?

Jill Stein: Let me say that whatever you think he is —

Mehdi Hasan: It’s not about what I think. I’m asking you. You’re running for President.

Jill Stein: If you want to pull him back, if you are a world leader, you don’t begin your conversation by calling someone a war criminal unless you have a…

Mehdi Hasan: So why have you called Biden and Netanyahu war criminals?

Jill Stein: Because we have a clear strategy and we have very strong support across the world.

Is Hasan trying to defend Biden and Netanyahu?

Because Jill Stein repeatedly agreed with Hasan on Putin being a war criminal. But Hasan keeps doubling back and trying to defend the American President and his Israeli ally from the accusation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

The problem is this: regarding Netanyahu she says “Well he is very clearly a war criminal.” Regarding Putin she says “With Russia it’s far more complicated” and “In so many words, yes.” She’s hedging out of calling Putin a war criminal directly so she can plausibly deny it. She will agree with general statements saying he could be a war criminal under those circumstances but she won’t say it directly so she can go “Oh no, Hasan called him a war criminal, I didn’t, I just agreed that if all of those things were true then he could be considered a war criminal!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I think her point is moreso that we’re actively funding and giving arms to Isreal to carry out these crimes, therefore we have more power to state things in that way from a geopolitical standpoint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-40 points

She’s hedging out of calling Putin a war criminal

“In so many words, yes.”

Hasan won’t take “yes” for an answer. Which is a weird thing to do, given that he keeps looping back around to attack her for her condemnation of Biden and Netanyahu.

She will agree with general statements saying he could be a war criminal under those circumstances

Under what circumstances is Hasan conceding that Netanyahu is a war criminal? All he does is deflect blame for war crimes away from Netanyahu, which is a really weird thing to do across multiple interview questions.

she won’t say it directly

She will and she did. Of course, Hasan keeps cutting her responses off to interject with new defenses of Netanyahu. Which is, again, a very weird way to establish Jill as a Putin-defender. It seems more like Hasan is hedging on Netanyahu and trying to back Jill into recanting her views on Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Is Hasan trying to defend Biden and Netanyahu?

Almost the very beginning of the interview:

Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one, which I think he is.

Unlike Jill Stein, he has no problem calling a war criminal a war criminal. But I am sure that, unlike Putin, Jill Stein would have no problem calling Joe Biden a war criminal immediately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

Unlike Jill Stein, he has no problem calling a war criminal a war criminal.

Who does he call a war criminal in the interview?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one [a war criminal], which I think he is.

Yeah, he’s really trying to defend them. Sure…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

He’s telling Jill what she said about Netanyahu, but he doesn’t seem to agree. He keeps doubling back and insisting she needs to condemn Putin (which she then does) and using that as a shield for Netanyahu in follow-up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The things you yourself quoted show he is not trying to defend biden and netanyahu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Uh. Second. Putin LOVES his pet Trump.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Dont forget Tulsi

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

It’s not just Jill Stein, it’s a lot of people you see talking about Gaza as some blood curdling atrocity, but they don’t have the same level of empathy or consideration for Ukrainians. The anti-Israel propaganda is just being used to drive the Muslim and progressive vote away from Dems. I think it’s turning out to be successful.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It’s not just Jill Stein, it’s a lot of people you see talking about Gaza as some blood curdling atrocity, but they don’t have the same level of empathy or consideration for Ukrainians.

I don’t want the US government selling weapons to Russia to use against Ukrainians. I’m glad we aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not yet, anyway. That’s absolutely Trump’s plan though. You want to help prevent that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You want to quit calling me a trumper every time I speak out against genocide?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Do you believe Putin when he claims Ukraine is committing genocide against Russia in the Donbas region,

Of course I don’t. It’s why I’m glad that we’re not selling him weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And other lies you tell yourself.

I’ve never met a Palestinian supporter that isn’t also a Ukrainian supporter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

The entirety of lemmy.ml would like a word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I signed up to Lemmy without knowing much about instances, can’t remember exactly why I picked lemmy.ml but it wasn’t politics.

Is this really a generalisation people have? Should I move…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ah, see I realized they were either all bad faith actors, bots, or idiots ages ago and don’t federate with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There are 20 Israel stories to every 1 Ukraine story on Lemmy.

Regardless of your opinion on the matter, this platform is being heavily astroturfed, and so are many other “liberal” platforms. It’s actually way worse here than on Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s actually way worse here than on Reddit.

Because after r/ChapoTraphouse was kicked out from Reddit for inciting violence, the tankies moved to create lemmy.ml.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Of course there are, and I probably post 3 of the 20.

Other than the alt-right, you’re not going to find any support for Russia in the West.

Why would we need to raise awareness and keep posting about Ukraine to the same level as Palestine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

we’re also numb to what’s happening in ukraine. people got tired around when it hit the one year mark

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I haven’t met any in real life as far as I’m aware, but I’ve seen plenty on here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I think they’re talking about the people on TV talking about it, not the protestors themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I guess the team running Monks account hasn’t woken up yet. A post about his heroine, and they haven’t said anything lol

permalink
report
reply
4 points

They’re usually late to the party. They didn’t post on another Stein thread until long after the discussion was over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just going to leave this here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/09/18/how-republicans-and-democrats-are-boosting-third-party-spoiler-candidates-as-trump-lawyer-represents-jill-stein/

Jay Sekulow represented The Green Party in their bid to get on the Nevada ballot.

Anyone who knows that name knows why this is absurd.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

And that somehow prevented her from simply calling Putin a war criminal like she did Biden and Netanyahu?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Oh, so she’s just spineless, then?

That really clears it up, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments