58 points

Well, that’s one way to crash the economy. But I’m sure if that happened it would somehow be the Democrats fault.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

“nobody knew that taxation policy was this complicated”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And immigrants

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

People really think the government does nothing for them…

Taxes should be reformed not eliminated. So many small communities will be wiped out. I’m open to solutions but it just feels like Trump was hired to try and tank the US so it leaves the global stage.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

He is Russian agent. I think this as been a long game ran by Putin who was an KGB agent and loved the Soviet Union and wants pay back for the US destroying it. Now if Trump wins he will get his wish and destroy America and economy. How long afterwards before China and Russia and any of our enemies would take advantage of our downfall and invade and conquer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ran

run

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

A lot of comments here suggest people didn’t read the article. It’s pretty clear he intends to increase tarifs, and that would substitute income tax. Hey even MAGAS as demented as trump still gotta fund that war machine somehow.

As for how effective it could be? Well it’s at least interesting, as it will effectively be a 75% consumption tax on manufactured goods as a replacement. This would probably reduce consumption (great), crash manufacturing (bad), and boost white collar sectors (especially finance).

Basically this will negatively impact blue collars, and benefit white collars and the rich. Oh look, the big con continues.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

And the silver lining - any negative consequences will be blamed on liberals/Democrats/THE JOOS, oops, I mean “the globalists”. What am I saying, they’ve been doing that for at least 40+ years…if you didn’t feel the glory of the golden showers of Ronnie’s trickle down economics, well, it’s because THEY took it, or THEY subverted Ronnie’s holy and virtuous plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tariffs are a pass-through cost. This would invariably hurt the US economy.

Fucking rubes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, but his base thinks that China pays the tariffs because they don’t know how anything works. Hell, Trump might believe that China pays the tariffs because he doesn’t know how anything works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

consumption tax on manufactured goods

You spell “food” funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d expect a sudden inflation, with suddenly expanded after tax income chasing the same or reduced goods due to less imports.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

“i love the poorly educated” --donald trump, feb 2016

he’s really baiting that demographic here.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Replacing income tax with a consumption tax (tarrif) sounds like a great way to reduce spending and wasteful consumption. Crashing the US economy is one way of doing degrowth, I guess.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments