168 points

I’ve said for a long time now that the U.S. government needs to stop relying on SpaceX and I’ve got a ton of pushback. “He’s not in charge of the company! He just owns it!” Yeah, well I am guessing he wasn’t talking to Putin about electric cars or Twitter.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

I mean, he absolutely was talking to Putin about Xitter as well, I’m guessing! This “champion of free speech” has pretty much silenced any opinions about Trump and his companies that he doesn’t like. Nice little preview of the world we’re careening toward where billionaires get all the money, all the power, and they can even direct the speech of media outlets…

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Nice little preview of the world we’re careening toward where billionaires get all the money, all the power, and they can even direct the speech of media outlets…

It’s already like that. It’ll just get a lot worse in the U.S. if Trump wins. There are plenty of countries where this is the norm already unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Hard to stop relying on the best rockets in the world. Maybe Blue Origin or RocketLab will step up but it’s hard to see that happening.

Better to just force him to divest than to drop one of the very few good launch providers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

They only are the best rockets in the world because the U.S. government has been giving them piles of money to develop them.

That should not have happened in the first place, but I would like to at least see the government seize their patents since they were paid for by our taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Take the company, keep the good people and make it a part of nasa.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’ve been giving Boeing lots of money too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how the space program works. NASA pays SpaceX for launch services. For other initiatives, NASA funds research initiatives through multiple companies for redundancy.

If we want to talk about pissing away money for rockets, how much money went to SLS development? Or maybe compare Boeing’s Starliner costs versus Crew Dragon.

Do the research and show me with numbers who the more cost efficient rocket development program is. I’ll wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Americans should probably nationalise SpaceX, or at least buy out a controlling percentage of the shares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The US should honestly just nationalize SpaceX and merge it into NASA. Add its operating costs into NASA’s budget, cut some redundancies, and I’m sure we’d see a lot of progress happen pretty quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’d rather see it run like the USPS. Let it be a quasi-independent company owned by the government. Even though Congress fucks with the USPS, they don’t fuck with it like they do NASA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nationalizing SpaceX would probably be financially disasteous (seeing as how Musk has to keep pulling money from his businesses to fund twitter, and to buy out Gwynne Shotwell, who was approached by Boeing to be their new CEO in late 2022)

Most people assume Musk’s businesses are all on incredibly shaky ground financially and are propped up entirely though hype and speculative credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thats like saying Bezos doesn’t run WAPO and didn’t kill the endorsement, its a nonsensical notion

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree, but I heard it many times right here on Lemmy. By people also saying things like “I know Elon is terrible, but…” in the post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Starlink + Twitter = propaganda mills deliver him Ukraine

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How do you think he launches those Starlink satellites?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yeah, well I am guessing he wasn’t talking to Putin about electric cars or Twitter.

Starlink + Twitter = propaganda mills deliver him Ukraine

How he launches those satellites has nothing to do with our exchange unless I missed something.

I’m simply pointing out that any platform to influence public opinion and dialogue is likely of great interest to Russia. That’s kinda their schtick

Edit: but yes I absolutely think it’s absurd that they didn’t pull his clearance and sanction him both directly and indirectly. It’s just that Twitter gives Putin an edge in having Trump elected, in which case Trump extracts retribution for ‘being caught’ by witholding Ukraine funding in an attempt to gather intel on Biden. If Trump wins he’s gonna want nothing more than to see Ukraine crushed. Putin wants Ukraine and it’s a very easy opportunity

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Actually, Musk is not running the day to day operations at spacex, so removing spacex is not really a big need. He was driven out successfully from there a few years ago. But he’s still wrecking havoc at tesla.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s been talking to Putin regularly for years now. The damage has already been done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
18 points

Conservatism is about denying basic human decency to the majority in order to artificially elevate an elite to fawn over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hope it is up to us to decide that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

His starlink --> SpaceForce --> Alphabet agencies pipeline is what scares me

https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/10/24/live-coverage-spacex-to-launch-multiple-satellites-for-the-national-reconnaissance-office-on-falcon-9-rocket-from-vandenberg-sfb/

More of this shit’s going up next year… Just in time for for the DPRK/PRC/Russian/Iranian escalations

Lets privatize top-secret comms and AO mission orchestration. That’s not gonna bite us in the ass…

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Starshield is a gov constellation of starlink cubesats. Same tech, hopefully different governance. But I have my doubts where Musk is involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, I realized my mistake almost immediately and deleted the comment but apparently not fast enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

CIA needs to start doing its job and um… you know, protect American interests. The African scammer needs to go.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Security clearances are nominally the domain of the FBI, rather than the CIA. They tend to see themselves as a right-wing organization though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t think they were talking about revoking the security clearance here. At least not directly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

One part of having a security clearance is also willingly signing away certain protections that you as a private citizen otherwise have.

So fwiw him having a clearance does open the door for additional scrutiny were anyone willing to look.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yes, plus, he owns contracts with the government that likely contain classified information. It is just much easier to have him under a contract that allows them to just spy on him, in this situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments