its quality will not be lower than usa linux, as they will pull latest development but not push back (to the linux list)
personally i donât agree with sanctioning foss communities.
but fuckit, bring on more forks i say.
among other benefits, the scifi-type scenario of nations trying to patch eachothers backdoors and slip in new backdoors (and hopefully innovations). could make for an exciting OS space-race type scenario
personally i donât agree with sanctioning foss communities.
Foss communities arenât being sanctioned. Whole countries are. Itâs the same limitation whatever enterprise youâre in.
If Olympians have to renounce their country to take part in global competition, why do you not think a software developer wouldnât have to do the same to be involved in a global project?
Do you think itâs acceptable to make olympicians first bow to the west before they can take part in games?
Should Isnâtraelis first denounce the genocide before being able to contribute to the linux kernel or take part in olympic games?
Not the west. The global community.
âŚand should Israel be under sanctions? Absolutely.
this is a complex topic and probably belongs in a different thread.
essentially i donât personally believe in punishing citizens of a country for the actions of its politicians.
at best its misguided, at worse it basically empowers politicians on both sides who draw power from friction between citizens of different nations. typical divide and conquer bs.
why do you not think a software developer wouldnât have to
wouldnât or shouldnât? if you mean wouldnât, itâs not surprising and its not the devâs fault they have to comply with policy, so the criticism is not with them.
if you mean shouldnât, i donât agree with punishing athletes either, but regarding foss specifically, isnât the âfriendly competitionâ of olympics equivalent to that? sort of. in some ways yes. in other ways its actually the opposite.
collaboration is actually the opposite of competition.
and while thereâs a case for the benefits of healthy sports competition, i donât believe it truly fulfills the spirit of international goodwill to the degree it says on the packaging. foss and other forms of international collaboration for the betterment of greater society are definitely on a higher rung - in my opinion at least.
Probably better for BRICS countries to consider contributing to something different.
Realistically thereâs no feasible way for the US to block access to use the kernel, and even a soft fork of it will be laughably easy for glowies to exploit. There are a bunch of promising kernels that could be well suited for China and Russiaâs push towards RISC and ARM independence, whereas in Linux theyâd be tasked with maintaining drivers and other systems that are a massive security vulnerability if you donât have total control over them.
Iâd honestly even consider it a good idea for Russia to get the FSF to fight this considering itâs a blatant violation of the GPL. Even if the president can just say whatever they like, at least you can make it embarrassing and expensive for the chauvinists gloating at the labour they exploited for years.
It was expected. This is how âfreeâ development becomes a victim of not at all free dogmas. It is also how already fragmented Linux development becomes even more fragmented.
What ânot at all free dogmasâ are you referencing, and why is âfreeâ in scare quotes?
Whatâs free about delisting maintainers based on their country of residence?
First of all, saying âbased on their country of residenceâ is either grossly uninformed or (most probably) plain dishonest.
Ignoring that, the GPL-freedoms of companies subject to sanctions are still preserved, so⌠having established that your âfreeâ is not the same âfreeâ as in âfree and open source softwareâ, what the hell are you talking about?
First, youâre acting like the decision was made by Linus or another member of the team and that they werenât following the law.
Second, even if that werenât the case, itâs still completely free. Unless you can name one of the following freedoms that was impacted by those actions:
- Freedom 0: The freedom to use the program for any purpose.
- Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish.
- Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute and make copies so you can help your neighbor.
- Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits.
It doesnât. Russians are still free to use and contribute to Linux development. Just a few people lost their maintainer rights.
Right? Itâs weird how so many people upset about the situation in this thread are incapable of explaining why itâs a problem without lying.
Like, I get that it sucks to be removed as a maintainer because of reasons outside your control. But being, or continuing to be, a maintainer of a project isnât a right thatâs integral to that project being free.
Please donâtâŚ
Can we organize and force the Linux Foundation and/or OFAC to exclude open source software from these sanctions? Is anyone doing that yet?
What would be the point of the sanctions then? If the Linux Foundation were against it they could move the infrastructure to an other jurisdiction which does not sanctize countries, that would carry a strong message. But if they refuse to do that, whatâs wrong with othersâ forking it and doing it? Thatâs the point of opensource.
Americans should vote for Trump, heâs the best chance to overturn these ludicrous sanctions.
Trump isnât going to act against the interests of American Empire dumbass
Thanks for name-calling, real classy.
At least Trump is probably gonna normalize relations with Russia. On the other hand, heâs probably gonna support Israel even more fervently, whereas Harris would do the opposite - escalate the bickering with Russia and colden the relations with Israel. You canât have it all.
I thought this was a forum for Linux discussion, not promotion of fascists
For those who donât know about Escobarâs axiom: https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/escobars-axiom-of-choice-1
