Turns out there are plenty of things more worthy of fighting for than enabling fascists and terrorists to lure in vulnerable people and harass marginalized people

1 point

I think the issue is that free speech needs rules to it or else you will always have hate like the nazis festering in some corner somewhere. It needs to be understood that hate, discrimination, racism, etc. Are the things NOT tolerated so everything else can be safe.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Same thing with democracy. It seems perfectly reasonable until you realize there are some very ignorant out there

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

People do not understand that free speech only applies to governments, because governments are supposed to have a monopoly on violence. Violence between citizens is illegal, however violence by the government onto the citizens is perfectly legal. The government has all the right to force you to go to prison against your will with a lot of allowed means.

There’s (mostly) no such thing between citizens. There’s stuff like self-defense but that’s pretty much it. So free speech is necessary as a governmental concept since otherwise citizens may feel the full force of the government’s wrath just for saying something the government doesn’t agree with.

But between citizens, theoretically if everyone adheres to all laws, there’s nothing really bad that one citizen can do to another. Yeah you might be shunned socially, which definitely can be incredibly bad, but it’s more easily manageable than being shot or put into a dark cell for the rest of your life.

So the “free speech” concept is not really something people should try to apply to their lives except when dealing with the government. If someone says some nasty shit, everyone else is free to start ignoring them or not letting them come into their spaces. That’s how it should be, it’s not even remotely desirable to let them continue spouting their nasty shit without consequences.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

+1

“Be nice” is a very effective rule if you can only choose one. No need for anyone to start getting all philosophical or inflammatory. We request that you be nice or get the fuck out

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

free speech only applies to governments

That’s the American view of free speech from the American constitution. It’s very specific, and not universal at all. Free speech can be a philosophical concept, and it existed way before the American continent was discovered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I was talking from the viewpoint of a European country, and I definitely know that it applies to the majority of other European countries as well. So it’s not exclusively American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Except reddit just got rid of the alt right racists but then doubled down on the leftist racists. Remember the whole you can’t be racist against a minority but you can be against a majority global rule? They didn’t get rid of racism, they just switched it around. But in all honesty American politics ruined that site the same way /pol/ ruined 4chan.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not really sure what the point of this whole post is all authoritarianism is pretty cringe but I guess one group cries more.

See just some totally normal behavior over here.

https://exploding-heads.com/post/169768

https://exploding-heads.com/comment/63062

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Most people are ok banning Nazis. It’s when you start banning Christian soccer moms, Republicans, slightly right of center you are full of shit.

If someone says

I am Nazi, heil Hitler. Here is a swastika it is my symbol.

Yes ban them.

If someone says

Life begins at conception. Marriage should be between a biological man and biological woman. Christ is king.

And you ban them while calling them Nazis you are kinda a ass hole. And you make the word Nazi mean less every time

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

If someone says

I am Nazi, heil Hitler. Here is a swastika it is my symbol.

Yes ban them

I think that depends on whether or not that person actually believes that. If it’s just low quality edgelord shitpost spamming the community yeah get rid of it, but if this person is actually willing to have a good faith discussion on their ideals I think the conversation being had for better or worse seems preferable to just outright banning/silencing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

ShowerThoughts

!showerthoughts@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Sometimes we have those little epiphanies in the shower… sometimes they come from other places. This is a home for those epiphanies.

Community stats

  • 209

    Monthly active users

  • 38

    Posts

  • 301

    Comments

Community moderators