28 points

“intel core 9 ultra” sounds like something apple would name

permalink
report
reply
13 points

iCore 9 Pro Max

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

iCore 9 Pro Max

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m still annoyed HBO Max was changed to Max. Fucking stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Let’s just have Microsofts Xbox division name then.

  • Intel Core 5
  • Intel Core 5 ultra
  • Intel Core 5 series Ultra
  • Intel Core 5 series Ultra pro
  • Intel Series Ultra Core Pro 5
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You forgot

  • Intel Core Intel 5 Series Pro

which is different from

  • Intel Core 5 Series Pro
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Don’t forget

  • intel core one slim

Which is their best one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And then you’d have the following processors be called the Intel Core 360, followed by the Intel Core 1

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Intel says the rebranding “better aligns to customer requests” to simplify its processor names

But it doesn’t simplify the processor name!? Instead of i5, we now have to say “core 5” or “intel core 5”.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Even worse … we have to specify between “Core 5” and “Core Ultra 5”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Dang it. It’s even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

“I’d like to order the newest chip you got. The Beyond Plus Ultra Core Ultra 5+ Supreme Deluxe. No, I will not accept the Beyond Plus Ultra Core Ultra 5 Supreme Deluxe. That is last gen garbage from last week.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They should hire you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I have a feeling everyone’s going to end up calling them i9s anyways

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Probably. The “core” name is too close to the old “Core2Duo/Quad” names anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re probably not too worried about people getting them mixed up with 15 year old CPUs

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Before it was Intel Core i5 so it’s simpler than the old name

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well officially yes, but I don’t know anyone that consistently called it “Intel Core i5” instead of just “i5”. And I don’t see that happening with just “5”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

“Which processor do you have?”
“5”

said nobody ever

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They don’t seem to understand where the customer confusion comes from. A lot of people out there don’t really realize that a Core i7 could mean very different things because that name has been slapped on new CPUs for…15 years. They delineate product generations as part of a model number (2600k, 6700k, etc). There is so much ambiguity when someone just says their computer has a Core i7, non tech-savvy folk aren’t going to remember the string of numbers that comes after that.

AMD copied them, and that probably leads to similar confusion.

Apple seems to be the smart one in the room when it comes to CPU naming. The generation of the product is right there in the first part of it’s name: M1, M2, etc. The performance class is suffixed (no suffix, Pro, Max, Ultra).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Man, I guess I’m at least middle age now. I remember thinking my first custom build’s processor was definitely gonna have to be one of these brand new badass i7s.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

My first PC, custom built, was an Intel 486DX4 100Mhz. 4MB RAM and a 800MB HD. Paid in a currency that doesn’t exist anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trust? That seems like a currency that doesn’t exist anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mine was 75MHz and 8MB of RAM. Windows 95 was too heavy but WFW was great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Man, I was a teenager, reading the PC magazine ads, wishing I had the money to build a system like this!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’ll still know what the numbers at the end mean

“Though Intel does promise to keep the generation of a chip noted in the codename, i.e. ‘Core 9 15900K’.” [1]

[1] https://www.pcgamer.com/intels-ditching-the-i-in-core-i5i7i9-and-will-stop-calling-out-chip-generations/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yeah, removing one character isn’t gonna simplify things if we’re taking on more stuff at the end.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

oh boy I can’t wait for the Intel Core 5 Pro Max Ultra HD and Knuckles

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Featuring Dante from the Devil May Cry Series, NEW Funky Mode+

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Battle Royale at the Olympic games, anniversary edition

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Featuring Dante from the “Devil May Cry” series!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 82K

    Comments