8 points

I somehow didn’t connect that this post was for labor day the first time. I closed Lemmy and then it hit me.

I need caffeine.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

That’s because the real Labor Day is May 1st. America changed it so it was less communist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

While I’m as pro Union as they come, I do not personally believe Labor Is Entitled To All It Creates, there’s a place for Entrepreneurial, Investment, Ownership and Management cut outs, but I believe these percentages should be strictly monitored and regulated. Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

permalink
report
reply

If they actually do any labor in those tasks, then yes. Labour doesn’t necessarily mean the bottom level stuff. Management still takes work. Setting up new businesses takes work.

Investment and ownership intrinsically aren’t really labor though. Just owning the company doesn’t add anything of value to anyone, and investing is more like a trade agreement. Should be honored, but not necessarily treated the same. Because investment does help create, and the owners presumably have done work to get from nothing to something of value in the first place. Ideally, anyway. This isn’t necessarily true in reality. Plenty of owners inherited, and why should they be entitled just for being born lucky?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Many projects take a long time to become profitable. The workers would starve until then.

Because of that, they need to borrow wealth to be able to keep working on the project until it becomes profitable.

The concept of lending wealth is therefore necessary.

Noone is gonna accept the risk of lending out wealth unless they expect some gain, some profit.

Therefore the workers promise to not only repay the lent wealth but to also pay on top of that, perhaps a share of the project’s profit.

Hence the concept of profitable investment is necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They don’t starve if food production is turned to the goal of feeding humans.

You think entirely too small.

Humans made Capitalism, and we can unmake it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I believe these percentages should be strictly monitored and regulated

By labor.

Worker coops for everyone!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Management is either labor, or entirely parasitic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Management is certainly a kind of labour and even a valuable one. A good manager can ensure the efficient operation of a whole organization, and a bad one can waste the efforts of whole teams and sink entire departments. No one is arguing managers and executives shouldn’t be justly compensated for their labour.

The problem comes when the compensation becomes detached from the labour. When a business produces a surplus and instead of that surplus going to the workers who produced the surplus, it goes to the investors.

Often these investors perhaps put some money into the business many years or even generations earlier, and yet are still entitled to receive cheques every quarter despite not having any role to play in producing that quarter’s surplus. How is that just?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Management should be considered a part of labor in this regard. Intellectual labor is labor and a situation in which management is beholden to those they lead but seen as part of it is where I’d consider ideal. It could be a situation like union stewards where they’re elected from the rank and file or a situation where they seek out someone with the specific skills they’re looking for in the same way they might hire a maintenance worker.

I do think there’s room for a limited reward for entrepreneurial and investment costs, but the idea that they have control in perpetuity is where I have issues. I think a situation where they’re automatically bought out for a reasonable return on investment given the risk is fair enough. Though I worry it will perpetuate the issue of wealth begetting wealth

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Guinness stout one pint, 6 degrees centrigrade

zzzt!

Well that’s my work for the day!

permalink
report
reply

Now it’s time to hunt some jerries in the battle of britain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

This post sponsored by my transporter clone.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points

Do you own the machinery that makes what you’re helping to make? Most things aren’t made by your hands alone.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The machines are but worthless scrap without the human labor to operate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

They cost more too. Point is the boss has made numerous monetary investments and you just sell your time to make them work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Boss pays other people to build the machines.

Boss pays other people to gather resources.

Boss pays other people to run the machines.

Because The Boss is so hardworking he gets to decide who gets the money.

This is capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

At the last few jobs I’ve had? Yeah. Cheap bastards made me buy my own fucking tools

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Would that make you a contractor? You own the tools you use then you can go wherever else. If you aren’t a contractor then refuse and go elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nah, it’s not uncommon in the trades in the US to expect workers to bring their own tools. It’s bullshit, but unfortunately we’ve normalized lots of bullshit here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And when every company in my industry requires me to own tools?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To quote a wise and angry man: “Fuck the G rides, I want the machines that are makin’ em”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Risa

!risa@startrek.website

Create post

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on’n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don’t break the weather control network.

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments