We’ve got a bunch of new people now so let’s bring back a classic post. What low stakes conspiracy theory do you believe that you cannot prove but feels right to you?

I’ll start: I believe that dating apps have made a concerted effort to smear in person meeting people and tie it to being “creepy” through social media so you are forced to meet people online(which was the creepy option just 15 years ago)

110 points
*

Public programs are purposely underfunded to make it easy for people to point to why they don’t work (the average person doesn’t think about/care whether they get funding), making it easier to continue the process of privatizing everything.

Many conspiracy theories aren’t actually conspiracy theories but a consequence of profit-driven motives that give the illusion of a conspiracy theory.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

That’s not even a conspiracy it’s the explicit neoliberal plan

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

The first one is just political strategy, it’s known as starve the beast

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

That’s just observable facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Hmm not sure I like the framing here, liberals are 100% culpable as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

Public programs are purposely underfunded to make it easy for people to point to why they don’t work (the average person doesn’t think about/care whether they get funding), making it easier to continue the process of privatizing everything.

I 420.69% believe this is 100% true. It’s such a great feedback loop for someone wanting to dismantle it. It doesn’t work so no one uses it, no uses it because it doesn’t work, and it doesn’t work because it was underfunded and ill-equipped, and it was underfunded and ill-equipped because they didn’t want it to work. It doesn’t work so no one uses it, its perceived value is lessened so it then doesn’t work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

And then you can make great use of absolute numbers over more contextualized relative numbers/ Here’s a made up example:

why did it cost 700 million to vaccinate every American??
$700 million / 300 million Americans = $2.33 per vaccination, insanely cheap. Less than you spent on gas tax getting to and from work today.

I’m always immediately suspicious when someone starts throwing around absolute numbers like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m always immediately suspicious when someone starts throwing around absolute numbers like that.

Agreed! Anyone who uses tries to use math to justify why a bad thing is a good thing goes to super hell. The one where the Doom Slayer just goes buck wild. That’s where they go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

As someone who works with houseless folks this is absolutely without a doubt a thing. There are for profit companies springing up that do similar social services that I do, too, so the privatization part even applies. It’s fucked

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, afaik this is pretty widely acknowledged. Both the GOP and the Dems do it. The notable example I can think of is all the public housing projects the US grudgingly built in response to Soviet housing programs, then deliberately starved of resources to convince people they don’t work.

Starving education of resources so it can be privatized has been ongoing program for decades. Everyone’s in on it - Tech Billionaires wanted to control education so they could proletarianize coding and they largely won. Christian Fascists wanted Charter Schools so they could re-impose segregation. Democrats wanted to privatize everything so they could loot public education funds and divert the money to magnet and charter schools, while also stripping resources going to minorities. The whole purpose of property-tax funded education was to ensure that class was rigidly enforced.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think the story about the passengers fighting back on United flight 93 is fake and it was shot down by the military.

permalink
report
reply

feel like most people on this site believe this one

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

United flight 93

Idea for a bit: Hexbear passengers on United Flight 93 having a struggle session on whether it’s okay to critically support our hijackers if they really do intend to fly the plane into the Capitol building.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I could see Mel Brooks or Monty Python pulling that. I don’t know who the equivalent screwball black comedy people are these days. Eric Andre?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even That Mitchell and Webb Look is a decade old at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

ohhhh, I never heard this one

honestly sounds true

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Both can be true. The story is entirely plausible, though. People had cell-phones and the towers had already been hit.

I think there’s a cultural memory hole thing going on - Hijackings used to be really, really common and were usually resolved without too much violence. Being hijacked would definitely ruin your day, but the general wisdom was to just sit tight and wait to be rescued or ransomed or whatever. A lot of the time passengers would be released after the hijacker’s demands were met.

Pretty much the only reason 9/11 worked as well as it did is because up until then no one had tried it. Once the people on 93 knew what the stakes were it was, what, 150? 200 people against four or five armed with small knives? Most people aren’t fighters but those are still really, really bad odds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Were cell phones usable on planes in 2001?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No, but back then some planes had payphones on the seat back where the touch screen entertainment systems are now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

100% believe it

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

“Nobody cares” tier stakes, but I think Nintendo made games in the dying days of the Wii U that didn’t use the gamepad at all so they could later easily directly port them over to other consoles and thus sell them to people twice.

permalink
report
reply

Sure, I’ll add that to my worldview

permalink
report
parent
reply

Zelda BOTW

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Zelda BOTW BTFO, damn

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

it actually plays better on the wiiu, because it can process more than a calculator

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

I totally believe this, they really did give up on that controller

It would be so cool if the next console could stream menus to a Switch haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

if the next console isn’t just a switch with the same form factor and dock and controllers but a different, slightly better graphics chip and CPU, i’m going to be very unhappy

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The Switch is running on a mobile chipset from like eight years ago, the next one better be more than just a little better, lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s Nintendo, they love to shake things up even when it’s not necessary. The next console is going to be a bicycle with an AR windshield or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points
*

Incredibly low stakes but still technically a conspiracy theory.

There’s a town in Wales called Beddgelert. They have a story about how the town is named after a loyal hound who was mistakenly killed in revenge by Llewellyn the Great who believed Gelert killed his infant son. They have a statue and all the typical tourist trap shit.

Cute story except for one thing.

It’s all a lie. The story of Gelert was made up in the 18th century by the owner of a local hotel, David Pritchard, who was looking to drum up tourism. There’s no record of the story before then, the burial mound was erected some time shortly before he started circulating the myth, Gelert wasn’t a name before then. The town was actually named after Celert, an 8th century missionary who settled there, and 13th century censuses that list the town as Bedkelert seem to support this assumption.

Eryri tourist board has taken you for fools!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

The guy literally just copied this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Guinefort

permalink
report
parent
reply

Dating apps deliberately match you with incompatible people so you keep returning and paying for premium.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

there’s no way this isn’t true. i have personally experienced this on those apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Probably it is like slot machine programming. Average is bad, but will give out a minor win timed so that you still believe that it is possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

When I am using dating apps, I completely delete my account and remake it every few weeks.

From my experience, they give your profile a lot of extra reach in the first 2-3 weeks or so before throttling it.

It’s been a while since I’ve done this, though, I imagine they’ll eventually start combating that strategy if they’re not doing it already.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Do you mean they hide people you would be compatible with?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wonder if there’s a way to game it so you actually get matched with people you are compatible with, ie. by pretending to be someone else as far as the algorithm is concerned. Or if their algorithms are so good that you can’t even get away with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

chat

!chat@hexbear.net

Create post

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 26K

    Comments