80 points
*

Actually, Lavrov did not said that sanctions will be lifted, he said that there will no be new sanctions

Here’s the video: https://t.me/zarubinreporter/1302

He’s saying here as an answer to “Why Russia is sanctioning DPRK?” basically this: “Russia wasn’t sanctioning DPRK, Security Council was. Sanctions were implemented in completely different enviroment, and, as always, the West did not do anything on their part what we were agreing on. Russia and China were lied to, and the West is suppling weapons to South Korea, SEVERAL YEARS AGO WE AGREED WITH CHINA THAT THERE WILL NO BE NEW SANCTIONS ON DPRK”

By the way, I have limited knowledge of English, and also were writing basic meaning of his words, not literal translation

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Thank you, I thought this was unfortunately unrealistic and I was right to hold my hype back. Sad but at least they won’t add more sanctions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It’s actually more than that, it means that they plan on increasing bilateral trade and economic ties in a massive way such that the old sanctions will become increasingly obsolete as they will simply develop more and more ways of circumventing them.

In effect the sanctions will still be there (because it’s virtually impossible to lift Security Council sanctions ever as the West has veto power) but they will be an empty formality. Make no mistake, these developments that we’re seeing are HUGE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Announcing this now though, is an indication of intentions. And the intentions are probably to raise trade with DPRK as a first stage. There’s also a possibility that DPRK might attempt to join BRICS for trading.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points
*

Why exactly was China sanctioning the DPRK?

Also, good for them. The DPRK is a country of enormous potential ideology wise, people wise and resources wise.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

why haven’t they vetoed the USs veto of lifting sanctions on cuba that everyone votes for every year for the last 40 years or whatever?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s UN Security Council sanctions. They are not lifting existing sanctions, just not implementing new sanctions on the DPRK.

In Russia, there are two versions about why Russia participated in the sanctioning of DPRK.

First, is that Russia wanted to appease the West so they went along with the sanctions.

Second, is that China wanted the DPRK to stop developing its nuclear weapons (remember the Chinese leadership has a lot of libs who love America at one point, especially before Trump), but the DPRK didn’t listen (good decision, considering what happened to Libya) so China decided to punish DPRK from the UNSC as a warning, and dragging Russia to go along with it.

Both versions are not mutually exclusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It is worth noting that even as China went along with sanctions, they were arguing for a gentler approach and I think successfully derailed a couple of escalation attempts by the US. They were probably scared of being pushed away from western Bloc countries if they sided too hard with the DPRK, however unjust that treatment of True Korea is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Even still, kinda odd that China would follow the sanctions on a neighboring country that is friendly to them. Glad to hear that things are changing

permalink
report
parent
reply

They were not exactly friendly until the last few years. China was looking to deepen its economic ties with the US and EU, and saw North Korea’s nuclear development as a nuisance to their path towards prosperity. You have to understand that, at least from 2005-2015, China has a lot of pro-Western libs who love America. I cannot emphasize enough how many of my friends saw capitalism as the way forward even as late as 5 years ago.

Of course, Trump gave China the biggest wake up call they could ever hope for, and things have never been the same since.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

China has done some shady things when it comes to foreign policy. It’s actually one of the main critiques I have of china, and while the foreign policy they conduct is far better than pre-Xi, is still far too conformist and ‘pragmatic’ for my liking, especially considering it’ll benefit more nation’s if china becomes more assertive.

From giving weapons to the Philippines government to fight Filipino revolutionaries, to its participation in the Nepalese civil war in the favour of the government, instead of the communists. Still I’m hopeful china will correct this mistake soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, I think that China wasn’t very pleased with the DPRK conducting nuclear tests and potentially harming Chinese soil and people. This isn’t an issue anymore, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

China and Russia are on the security council, and could have vetoed them

permalink
report
parent
reply

Misleading, see the other comments.

It was the Security Council sanctioning

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

China’s stated reason for the sanctions is a policy of a de-nuclearized Korean peninsula. In theory, if the DPRK got nuclear weapons without Chinese opposition, there’s nothing China can then say if the ROK pursued nuclear weapons in response.

permalink
report
parent
reply

uncritical support for the DPRK in its heroic struggle to liberate occupied Korea from the genocidal American empire

Death to America

permalink
report
reply
17 points

DEATH TO AMERICA!!! 💖💖💖

permalink
report
parent
reply

Juche gang rise up

permalink
report
reply
36 points

If the US gets to use its nukes then the DPRK gets to use theirs, fair is fair.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

A classic

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

OH NO, THEY WERE SITTING IN ROWS, THIS IS FASCIST, EVERYTHING SHOULD BE DISORGANIZED AND THEY SHOULD HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT MASS SHOOTINGS JUST LIKE IN THE UNITED SHITHOLE STATES OF AMERICA!

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Sitting in rows??!? What totalitarianism is this

permalink
report
parent
reply

That kid:

permalink
report
parent
reply

GenZedong

!genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

  • No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
  • We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
  • If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
  • Unless it’s an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
  • For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
  • Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

Community stats

  • 636

    Monthly active users

  • 3.9K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments