She also made $29,000,000 in 2022 for herself, cause she worked so hard and made so many cars herself. Ha

159 points

Keep these CEO memes coming. These assholes need to have a spotlight shown on them. A company is not a person, a company is ran by people.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

They’re laughing all the way to the bank. The have not one care for what you or I think of them

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

They do if we threaten their pockets or their lives.

Historically, which one is targeted is their choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I’ve heard eating them works too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Only one has ever really gotten their attention. They can always make more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Fucking hell people here on lemmy are batshit insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Should name the companies as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And the share holders

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Just replace ceos with AI lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seriously, a lot of CEOs and most managers could be much more easily replaced by AI than the workers. Run some analysis on some metrics lay off people based on that. Go over the market analytics, direct staff to work on derivative versions of the products that have good numbers, cancel products that don’t. I’m not even sure if you really need AI for this, a very basic script could handle a lot of it.

Of course a program would be lacking in the common sense to say “Nobody is going to drop a week’s pay so they can go into a virtual world where they’re a poorly drawn legless cartoon character”. But present day CEOs make these mistakes anyway. It wouldn’t be good, but it wouldn’t be worse than the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points

Stock buybacks need to be made illegal again. I don’t understand how it’s anything other than market manipulation.

permalink
report
reply
116 points

Ronald Regan really fucked this nation over. . .

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

He’s was the first paid actor, just a puppet so the people in control can remain unknown. Skull and bones secret society was/is a real thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

It’s not a secret, we know who the billionaires are that are funding this madness, but the only people that could put a stop to it, are the ones benefiting from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nixon never should have been pardoned

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Shareholder primacy was from the Henry Ford days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

It makes sense if they’re pulling out of the stock market entirely, in that case it’s just settling the books. Any other reason is to manipulate the price. The whole stock market is a house of cards controlled directly by a few self-titled elites though, so chicanery is literally built in and always was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I agree. I could live with it if it were merely a way to defer taxes, but the U.S. has something called the stepped-up basis. This allows people to inherit stocks without paying tax on the capital gains. The wealthy can live their whole lives without paying any tax. Both stock buy-backs and the stepped-up basis severely undermine the stock market and tax system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The real parasites in society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you. And amazing to see you have positive upvotes.

Whenever someone makes a comment like this on reddit, an army of accounts would appear to downvote and argue against it.

I’m convinced the narrative on reddit is highly controlled on these kind of topics.

Either that, or the retards of WSB were the culprits and they haven’t found their way to lemmy yet.

Now that I think of it, perhaps those same accounts were used to manipulate retail traders on WSB… hmmm…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I am an MBA and agree that buybacks are fine. The problem is toxic anti-capitalism from my perspective. People are not really educated well on these topics. I find your comment funny that an army of accountants come to explain things and help everyone understand the nuances and why this is needed, but all the experts are somehow shills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It’s very obviously is. Stock buybacks aren’t allowed almost anywhere else in the world for a reason. It just leads to terrible behavior. This coupled with insanely low effective corporate tax rates means companies horde capital and do buybacks instead of doing other activities that are more economically beneficial to the country. Like increasing worker pay…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If I’m being honest, I don’t understand this angle. Why are stock buybacks immoral or wrong? Isn’t it simply using extra cash in a company to buy back stock from shareholders? With the same demand and reduced total stock, of course the price is going to go up. But the total market capitalization remains the same. I don’t understand why this is somehow wrong. Can someone help me out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Because executive pay is largely given in shares, so it incentivizes the leadership to invest funds in buy backs to inflate the price of the very shares they own instead of investing that money into employee pay or other company centric initiatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The other reply is correct regarding the macro effects of the practise. The more immediate issue is that it allows shareholders to avoid paying dividend taxes. So they can effectively defer paying taxes until they realise any capital gains. This is a huge benefit, as the present value of money is worth much more than the future value of money. However there is an even larger benefit in the U.S. Dependents can inherit stocks at the current price and avoid paying any capital gains tax. This is called the “stepped-up basis.” It’s an insane tax loophole. Together stock buy-backs and the stepped-up basis allow the ultra wealthy to pay little to no tax, ever. They take out perpetual loans to pay for living expenses, guaranteed against their holdings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree. They need to do a reverse split if they want to change the shares in circulation.

The idea was a company could show faith by buying their own stock. Now ceo pay is tied to factors associated with the stock that can be manipulated by buying it back.

The IBM bro Ginny made millions while the company shrunk by manipulating the stock.

I don’t care what a ceo makes. I do care what they do. If they’re only focusing on themselves, I care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

A tale as old as mankind. Like 20 years ago I saw a movie. Some indie thing from France or Spain. The kind of shit that gets highly acclaimed at the Cannes film festival. In one scene there was a bricklayer reciting a poem (from the top of my head and loosely translated from German):

My grandfather was a bricklayer. My father was a bricklayer. I am a bricklayer, too. But, tell me, where is my house?

That allways stuck with me.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

You load 16 tons, what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt

St. Peter, don’t you call me 'cause I can’t go

I owe my soul to the company store

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The devil put the coal in the ground

Devil put the coal in the ground

He buried it deep so it’d never be found

Devil put the coal in the ground

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I did some brain jogging and I think in German it went like this:

Mein Vater war ein Maurer. Sein Vater war ein Maurer. Auch ich mauere Tag ein Tag aus. Doch sag mir, wo steht mein Haus?

Which would translate to

My father was a bricklayer. His father was a bricklayer. I, too, wall up day in and day out. But tell me, where is my house?

But I can’t figure out what the movie was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Stock buy backs used to be illegal in the USA. It was seen as a form of corruption.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

It’s blatant stock manipulation. The stock price goes up because they increase demand for the stock for no reason. The value of the company doesn’t change at all other than they’re holding stock as an asset instead of the cash. Yet the stock is worth more now. It’s stock manipulation, plain and simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s almost as if stocks are a really shitty way to get rich from nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

: “It’s not corruption if you legalize it!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

When organized labor is weak and non-militant, capital can get away with a lot more, so it does get away with a lot more.

It strips away anti-corruption, regulations, and social democracy as soon as it can get away with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I approve of this series of memes. Please continue.

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

But…but it’s politics! Surely politics must always be 50/50 divisive, and not be based around universal assmunchers that any sane person should agree is an asshole?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments