264 points

permalink
report
reply
45 points

It’s a slow top-down, follow the chain of command, follow policy, follow the chain of custody, vote, protest, violently seize the means of production,

until we have universal healthcare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah except almost every other western nation that got universal Healthcare without half of that because their entire government isn’t controlled by rich oligarchs who profit directly from private healthcare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Means of production? Shit is produced in china? You mean attack china?

We have universal healthcare without any of that. Strikes and organisation is the key.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

so what you’re saying is that its gotta wait till it trickles down to us then

(JOKE please for the love of god dont kill me trickledown econ is for the stupid)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

violently seize the means of production

I was with you until this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

:( same initial thought here…

permalink
report
parent
reply
164 points

I like that the thumbnail is John Fetterman. Like who else could this be almost explicitly aimed at.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

Exactly. Now watch, some of the GOP that complained about Fetterman’s clothing choice will take it to the extreme and wear a chicken costume or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Personally I’m holding out for aborted fetus costume. I can feel it in my bones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ugh, you know what, I think you’re absolutely right. That’s gonna happen sooner or later. I dunno when, but I entirely expect it to eventually (or maybe very, very soon).

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Well there was a literal orange clown in the oval office for a few days so republicans were already dressing up

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lauren Boebert has gotten into the habit of dressing down too it sounds like

Ya know. With the whole tits out while jerking off her date in public around kids and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

For sure someone is going to try to leverage this. What back-bencher will jump at it, and make a splash?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I look forward to all the cock jokes. I’m thinking something like:

“Which is the bigger cock: Hunter Biden’s penis, or this chode in a chicken suit?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I hope he goes wearing overalls with one shoulder unbuckled and nothing else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Vince Wilfork Hard Knocks look is classic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Personally, I’m hoping for a full-on biker gang setup complete with jacket with a big patch on the back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Poor guy got so depressed having to wear a suit they changed the dress code. I can empathize. My boss told me to put a dress shirt on if I’m on camera with customers and I hate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think the rules said that women senators were supposed to wear dresses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They just want to see what Boebert comes up with when sbe wants attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is for the Senate only

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Dude looks like someone stuck an Astartes into a sweatshirt and jean shorts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would be funny if he voted no on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Zelensky

permalink
report
parent
reply
159 points

Ok so can we have universal healthcare now? Cause that should be the biggest issue every single day for them.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Until the filibuster is gone or there are 60 dem senators, a vote on universal healthcare will just be performative. You’re not going to get any Republicans voting for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

And then? Let it be performative. Make it the top issue every single day. Make sure nothing gets done until it gets done. Tie to budget, tie it to cabinet appointments, tie it feel good bills that do nothing. A single issue that shuts the government down until resolved. Eventually it will be. The DNC keeps playing nice and keeps failing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Republicans: Democrats want to shut down the government??

No. Wait. Stop.

See, your problem is in thinking Republicans want a functioning government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I didn’t realize you were talking about Republicans at first because of how bad they’ve gotten. I don’t even question it anymore with how normalized their evil policies have gotten.

I think they were a lot better at covering this up until 2010 when the Tea Party took hold. Since then they’ve been more and more blatant about it, culminating in totally taking off the mask in 2016. It seems to me that beforehand, the party elite carefully curated both their image and policies to have plausible deniability. With them losing control to the inmates however, the party hasn’t just thrown away their cover, they’ve decided to go for even worse policies.

It’s like they realized their followers are a cult, and they’re curious to see if anything they do goes too far to them. It’s such a pathetic state of affairs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Almost as wild as the turkies actually voting for Christmas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think most republican voters simply care more about “other people can’t get a free thing that I had to pay for” or “I don’t want universal healthcare because I’m healthy and I don’t need it”. Which are both incredibly selfish mindsets. The GOP knows about these mindsets and does everything they can to encourage them.

I think they now are so far gone that they find it easier to convince voters by spreading propaganda than it is to win people with good policies. I think part of it is that on the policy front, there’s stiff competition. But on the identity politics front, it’s not even a competition. The GOP is massively better at propaganda and identity politics. They know they’re better at it, which is why they’ve leaned so heavily into it while also having so little else to offer. Fixing problems often gets in the way of profit, so they don’t have an incentive to actually fix many problems (at least not for normal people).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well then perhaps the Democrats ought to engage in progressive theatrics as fascist theatrics seem to be effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This idea you seem to have that Democrat=progressive should have been fixed by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Hold on, we gotta approve socks and sandals

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Then, tax breaks for the rich and mega corporations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And then we have to take a break, that was a lot of work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

Time for femboy Congress

permalink
report
reply
33 points

The programming socks to legislating socks pipeline

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

10/10 comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

The average age of Congress is 182 years old

Um… maybe not lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Age shaming in the femboy community smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Naw. More like imagine Bitch McConnell in “programming socks”.

🤮

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hyperbolic bullshit as usual. They know very well that the average age is 181.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

AOC spoils the average 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Convert the National Archives into an estrogen lab

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Although senators will benefit from the change by being permitted to sport casual clothes in the Senate chamber, their staffs are still required to wear business clothes under the old dress code. People other than senators who walk on to the Senate floor will also need to wear business attire, which for men means a jacket and a tie.

One rule for thee but not for me.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Seriously, wtf sense does that make?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I can understand if they have some important meeting. If some foreign dignitary is going to be stopping by, you’ll want people to dress up. However, this should be the case for Senators and staffers. If it’s just a normal work day, there’s no reason that the staffers can’t go with casual clothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah that’s pretty much what I mean, with this change, the senate is proclaiming that there’s no need for formal dress on a “regular day in the office” (which I 100% agree with), but to make that declaration, while still insisting your staffers stay formal is literally saying “We get to be comfortable because we’re important and rich, and you can stay uncomfortable, because who gives a shit what you want.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments