un_owen

It’s not. The point is: you don’t get to decide what you call others. Especially when they’ve already corrected you and you know better. And it’s Miss btw, by your own logic.

Hmm, I see you as someone who is called Mr Poopyface, I guess it’s alright if I call you that then, Mr Poopyface?

The main purpose of ads isn’t to sell you a specific product immediately, their real purpose is to expose you to their brand to make the brand more familiar (and therefore more trustworthy) to you.

For example, recently, I needed a new insurance. So of course I went to the websites of the 5 insurance companies that I knew from advertising and compared their offers. Then I went to a comparison portal, which again I knew from the ads. The best offer was from a brand I didn’t know so I went with the second one which was from a well known brand. I trusted the second offer more, simply because the brand felt more familiar to me.

Here’s another story: there is this big online clothing store. I always hated their ads, they were really annoying, and at that time I didn’t understand why anyone would buy clothes online. So guess where I went, 5 years later, after a disappointing offline shopping tour, in desparate need for new clothes?

He’s such a pussy, he needs to be careful that he doesn’t grab himself by accident.

Oh right, I was not aware of JKRs comments on funding anti-trans organisations

That’s literally the point we’ve been trying to make for years. I couldn’t care less about whatever shitty “opinions” JKR posts on her Twitter profile, that’s not what makes her problematic. JKR is problematic because she is actively funding anti-trans campaigns.

I.e. that people often don’t have deep insight into the creators of the art they are enjoying, so considering liking Harry Potter as a statement about their feelings on the author doesn’t resonate with me

Which is fair, but then the same people get offended when you try to educate them. It’s the same debate every time a new Harry Potter medium is announced. At this point, you must be living under a rock if you are a Harry Potter fan and have never heard of the controversy that surrounds JKR.

I think most people don’t know about JKR because they don’t want to know. They are afraid that when they dig deeper, they will have to let go of their favorite franchise, so they choose denial and ignorance instead. It’s hard to give people the benefit of the doubt when a topic has been discussed so many times for so many years.

Sure, that seems reasonable to keep away from minors. Like, I couldn’t commit to whether or not I was a “music person” at that age;

People need to understand that not receiving hormone treatment is also a commitment to a gender—one that you don’t identify with. From that perspective, it’s plain stupid to deny children the treatment they need.

To stay with your example, let’s say you are 14, interested in music, but you hate sports. You might not be able to commit to being a “music person” at that age, but it would still be the obvious choice to further explore your interest in music rather than forcing yourself into being sports person instead.

And sure, there are blockers to delay some developments, but I feel like a lot of people don’t recognize that this is not a choice between A and nothing, but between A and B, and one path permanently locks you out of the other.

It’s basically two words that happen to be written as one: “Hersteller übergreifend”. We do this a lot in German. When you say it out loud, you are allowed to take a short break between the two parts of a compound noun. But nowadays, with all the influences from the English language, some people seem to forget that compound nouns even exists. So even native German speakers sometimes struggle to remember whether two words must be written together or with a space in between. It doesn’t help that auto correction/spell checkers aren’t very good with compound nouns either.

No it wouldn’t. Corpos would just put in more effort to hide the damage. Climate change can’t be stopped by individual consumers because they have no means to verify whether a product they want to buy hurts the environment.

Ich frage mich, ob das wirklich in unserem Interesse ist. Nach Zeit bezahlt zu werden hat immerhin den Vorteil, dass wir auch bezahlt werden, wenn mal nichts zu tun ist. Sollte man nach tatsächlich geleisteter Arbeit bezahlt werden, könnte es schnell zu Streitigkeiten führen – „Sie haben heute nichts geleistet, deshalb bezahle ich Sie heute nicht“. Nichtsdestotrotz bin ich natürlich auch für die Einführung einer 4-Tage-Woche.

1. Das Thema wird hauptsächlich von Rechten gepusht, die damit Wahlkampf machen. Niemand ist besessener von dem Thema als die GOP/AfD/Union.

2. Bei der Sprache gehts glaub ich immer noch vor allem um die Sichtbarmachung von Frauen. Dass mit dem Gender-Stern auch alle anderen Identitäten mit eingeschlossen werden, ist ein netter Nebeneffekt. Gegner des Genderns sind ja meist Verfechter des s.g. generischen Maskulinums, aber das fördert halt Ungleichheiten zwischen Mann und Frau (vor allem weil diese Leute dann trotzdem immer von Putzfrau, Sekretärin und Krankenschwester reden, sobald es um “Frauenberufe” geht)

3. Du hast es schon richtig erfasst: “gefühlt”. Es ist unwichtig, ob man nun zig verschiedene Identitäten aufzählen und zuordnen kann, der Punkt ist doch “du kannst sein wer du willst, lass dir nicht von andern irgendeine Identität aufdrücken, die nicht du bist”.

4. Weil Sprache sich dynamisch entwickelt und nicht von einem zentralen Gremium festgelegt wird. Aber der Stern scheint sich ja durchzusetzen, zumindest nach meiner Wahrnehmung.

5. Lieber legt man sich nicht fest, als dass man sich (unwissentlich) falsch festlegt. Ich hab Jahre damit verbracht, so zu tun, als wär ich ein Mann, weil das für mich so festgelegt worden ist, und glaub mir, gesund war das nicht. Und niemand will Kinder davon abhalten, ihre eigene Identität zu finden, man darf es halt nur nicht für sie fremdbestimmen.