You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

Just use yt-dlp instead of relying on websites that shove ads in your face and may do what ever they want to the files you’re downloading?

permalink
report
reply
32 points

The worst ever suggestion and unfortunately the most upvoted. Do not ever download music from youtube, free-mp3-download was a front-end for deezer with flacs and 320 kbps mp3 and music on youtube is only about 160 kbps, that’s kinda okay for streaming but absolutely ridiculous if you want to download and keep it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
8 points

Shhh dont tell em

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You can use yt-dlp to download from other website, not only on YouTube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You can tell the difference between 320kbps and 160kbps in a blind test?

If you can tell anything above 160 you’re in a select minority (and using great equipment). Most people will never have any use for 320.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Youtube actually uses 128kbps opus, which should be significantly better than 160kbps mp3

but the real problem is that you can’t know what quality the uploader used, it all gets recompressed by youtube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t understand where you guys get these conspiracy theories about the human ear from, you sound like the people who claimed the human eye couldn’t see a difference above 60 FPS. It’s just obviously wrong. Stop reading studies and telling yourself you can’t hear a difference. Use your ears.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Why do people still download music from YouTube in 2024? The quality is awful and it’s not even the easiest method of music piracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

it’s not even the easiest method of music piracy.

What’s easier than pressing 2 buttons in my YouTube app?

The quality is awful

It’s perfectly acceptable for me

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

You think YouTube audio is acceptable? Oof…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Personally, some of the particular covers sang by Youtubers or certain compilations remind me of specific memories back when I was younger.

Also there’s a lot of songs that are not available anywhere else

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We could say the same thing for SoundCloud or any other music hosting service. It’s not a reason to do everything on that one platform, especially when better alternatives exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I download it from youtube because that’s where I found it, and I’m not entirely sure what’s easier than just copying/pasting the link of the page I’m already on. I’m very confident other methods have better quality, but easier is a big statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Plus, it’s more likely you’ll find music you want on YouTube than Spotify or wherever since the author just needs to upload a video

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Soulseek is easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Some music I like are fan covers/remixes that may only be on YouTube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It was possible to download lossless FLAC files (they got them straight from Deezer) though, so higher quality than anything downloaded from Youtube etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

YouTube is absolutely unacceptable quality. The difference is clearly audible even on $5 earbuds. I feel sorry for your ears if you don’t hear the difference, but the vast majority of those who care enough to download music will be able to tell the difference.

I personally pay for Deezer HiFi and save the FLACs locally. Friends mostly do the same with Tidal, but both work well for this purpose.

If you want to find FLACs without paying for a service you can check out rutracker. It has torrents for discographies from a lot of famous artists. Alternatively, you could find a stolen account for one of the previously mentioned services, but that goes too far for my morals because you’re hurting a normal person with a hacked account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Despite all the naysayers in the comments, this is the correct answer. No ad-riddled websites, no weird guis. just “yt-dlp < url of whatever you want to rip >” in bash.

Lots of people responding to this need to acquaint themselves with the raw power of yt-dlp. It isn’t just for YouTube. You can rip Deezer and other streaming audio services. You can rip pretty much any video site. It even takes RSS and M3U8 links and will rip live streams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

On Android I use Newpipe for downloading audio-only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But I want 320mbps and I don’t want the extra sounds that come with some music videos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well I’ve found you can avoid the extra sounds as long as its available on YouTube music specifically, as that is a music specific platform but you have to only select from the songs section and not the Videos section. You get less selections than you would’ve before but not really since those extra ones weren’t even songs, but rather music videos.

Also Lyric videos basically never have any sounds in them.

(Doesn’t address the quality issues since many YouTube videos are limited in audio quality, I’ve found downloaders that can do it but it’s hit or miss).

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 87K

    Comments