You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Halo wasn’t even all that great to be honest. It was popular because it was an accessible, easy to play FPS on a console during a time when those types of games were mostly played on PC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That’s certainly one of the takes of all time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Mine personally is that all past Reach were garbage, I’ll never forgive what 4 did to the lore, humanity being around and a spacefaring race back when the forerunners were was fucking stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What if I told you that 343 didn’t make that decision. Ever wonder why Guilty Spark called Master Chief reclaimer? Though I agree with your point, 4 was the last halo game I bought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a similar bad take as OP about Goldeneye 64 tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

goldeneye 64 was pretty innovative even compared to its pc competition at the time. It suffered from performance issues, but the xbla remake or just good emulator settings fix that and really make it shine

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No way dude. it revitalized the fps genre which was circling the drain at the time, and some ideas Halo had are still felt in fps games today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I disagree. Half Life was top dog back then with Counter Strike, and Unreal Tournament and Quake arena for the multiplayer arena fps genre.

I found Halo’s level design pretty boring and repetitive. The story wasn’t appealing to me either. I didn’t like the American-like militarism aspect. Especially in that post-9/11 period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fps games circling the drain in 2001 is a crazy take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Oh? Maybe a bit hyperbolic perhaps. How bout this instead? Halo created a new renaissance for a genre that before Halo was niche, and afterwards became a powerhouse genre that drives the industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Halo under Bungie was pretty damn good.

They were unique for that OG Xbox era of consoles, and although there were a lot of great games on the PS2, the one thing they sorely lacked was a really good FPS. Timesplitters was close, but Halo was where FPS first felt designed for a controller. The level design was on point as well, things like The Silent Cartographer still hold up now. It wasn’t just a series of corridors.

Other devs cracked it by the next gen, notably Infinity Ward, but back in that generation Halo stood alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Totally agree! I remember being shuttled to the demo XBox by a GameStop employee who was fawning over the first Halo and I was not impressed having just finished Half Life 2

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Half Life 2 came out three years after the first Halo though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree. But didn’t Halo come out before HL2? HL1 still kicked ass though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments

Community moderators