You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

go vegan!

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Silly vegoon, only the cute animals I didn’t want to eat have feelings. The others are unfeeling slabs of meat that is magically created by wholesome farmers being folksy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A few coworkers refer to cows as giant dogs. Then they sell them to be butchered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seems well adjusted. I’d keep my kids away from them if I were you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As a new parent the agriculture propaganda from the very start is crazy! Look at this happy farmer and his cute pig its so happy in its mudpit, what a wholesome picture!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

ya, my sister is raising kids atm and she’s had to hunt for books that don’t associate farming with cuddly-happy—funtimes

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t eat meat, but the more we learn about plant intelligence, the less I can say with confidence that plants do not have their equivalents of things like pain and emotion. It doesn’t help that we have great difficulty defining what emotion means.

But we know a lot about plants now that we thought were animal things. Grass “panics” or “screams” by sending out chemical signals when you cut it as a warning to others of its species that they are seriously injured and danger is coming. That’s what the smell of fresh-cut grass is. Sure, calling it a panic or a scream is anthropomorphizing it, but it’s kind of hard to describe it in other terms.

We also have learned about “mother trees,” which will send resources to their offspring if the offspring let the mother tree know they are in desperate need of them. Which sounds very much like parenting in animal species. There’s also lots of evidence that plants can learn from experiences and retain some sort of memory of them in some capacity.

Do I think plants have the same sort of sentience as animals and will I stop eating broccoli? Of course not. But I will still have to admit that at the end of the day, I might just be choosing to cause a different kingdom of life pain and suffering because it’s far enough away from my species that I don’t consider that to be pain and suffering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

If you’re eating meat, then you’re contributing to the death of all of those plants that had to feed the animals you’re eating. Even if you grant plants sentience, veganism is still the more ethical option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

if you grant plants sentience, veganism is still the more ethical option.

… for ethical systems in which sentience is a consideration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Is “more ethical” really enough if you accept that plants can suffer? You’re still essentially saying one group of living things’ suffering is acceptable to you. Isn’t that like saying the holocaust of the Jews was bad, but the holocaust of the Roma at the same time was fine because there were fewer Roma than Jews? Does “less” matter when we’re talking quantities so massive?

I don’t think there are easy answers to any of these questions. Not if you want to approach them from an honest philosophical level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

If you’re eating meat, then you’re contributing to the death of all of those plants that had to feed the animals you’re eating

impossible. an event in the future cannot cause an event in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

fingers crossed we get star trek replicator food asap

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re conflating very different processes here. While there is the hard problem of consciousness and we can’t falsify ideas like panpsychism consider a few things.

If you amputate my hand and press on it it will emit nervous signals. Does anyone feel pain? If you destroy most of my brain but keep me alive, then stab me almost all the nervous activity and hormones etc associated with injury will happen. Is there any reason to believe there is any pain felt?

I would say no in both cases, pain is not emitting nervous impulses, or something that precedes releasing endorphins and inflammatory factors etc. Pain cannot even necessarily be reliably correlated with stress markers like heart rate, and in the case of phantom limb syndrome pain can even be associated with a complete lack of signals.

There are good evolutionary reasons to exhange information and resources, even unwittingly. Apparently some bacteria in my tummy are in conversation with my body constantly but I’m not at all aware or actively participating in that. Maintaing pain only really seems to offer advantage if you can do something about it, while it’s possible for things to exist accidentally it’s not like grass can move to places without mowers or trees shade themselves. In all animals with nervous systems the nervous systems are the vastly most expensive thing to keep alive. In fact there are a few creatures who when entering an immobile stage of life rapidly digest their own (a good explaination for both tenure and retirees!).

Plants don’t have rapid long distance communication in their bodies, they don’t have centralised organs, they don’t even have anything approaching the levels of activity we associate with the simplest nervous systems.

It’s probably best to think of grass “screaming” as skin cells “screaming” for resources to make more melanin when exposed to UV. Or lymph nodes “screaming” when releasing hormones to heal a wound and stuff. This is all vastly below the level of consciousness.

Or whatever, embrace panpsychism, like the invisible dragon in my garage nobody can prove it false /shrug. Animals eat plants though and thermo law 2 is a thing so even panpsychics minimise suffering by being plant based.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But what I am arguing is that is an anthropocentric view of what constitutes pain and suffering. We cannot assume either is not possible without a nervous system. It’s worth at least looking into the concept even though we don’t know that there would be a mechanism simply based on what we know about plants so far. I myself would put myself on the no side when it comes to whether or not plants feel pain, but I couldn’t say that it was a 100% definite no by any means and I think we may feel very differently about what it means to be a plant and what plants are capable of in 20 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It doesn’t help that we have great difficulty defining what emotion means.

There was this thing about fishing with hooks. Apparently it’s ok, since fishes don’t have the facilities to process pain as anything different than a robot would interpret sensory input.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thermostat sentience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Not in any way. This is actual science done by botanists and other biologists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
2 points
*

Fallacy

A (potentially) thinking or feeling plant has to be killed in order to eat it just like an animal has to be killed, and there’s no difference between the two.

Did you not read what I wrote? I made it very clear that there were a lot of differences.

And the fun part is that you’re the second person to tell me that I was trying to justify eating meat when, again, the first four words of my post are “I don’t eat meat.” I couldn’t have been more clear on that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just don’t try to force it on your pets.

Cats are obligate carnivores.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There are people working on foods for cats which aren’t based on cruelty. There already exist options, though some are sold as special diets.

Example: https://sustainablepetfood.info/

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284132 it’s already happening.

The work in “lab meat” products is actually going to contribute to this too.

Note: cats don’t eat cows or pigs or even adult chickens in “nature”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Believe me vegans put a lot more thought into nutrition than omni’s do. Aside from that pet ownership is not vegan. The word “ownership” being operative. If you find yourself having to care for an animal then that’s a different situation of course.

Here is some surface-level reading about caring for animals in a vegan way https://www.peta.org/living/animal-companions/caring-animal-companions/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Obligate carnivores in nature. Why do you care if a cat is fed with fortified plant bits vs fortified animal bits? Neither product exists in nature and the cat can live a healthy life on both. Also breeding cats to be pets is completely unnatural, so why are you fine with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s not a “moral” obligation, it’s how their body actually processes and uses proteins and nutrients… you know, it’s probably better for me to not engage here. Stop neglecting animals based on your own beliefs.

Go get a rabbit for a pet instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Let me burn this horses skin so it is marked for the rest of its life

dont you dare put your cat on a vegan diet!

I believe it ties into the “if it cant be done 100% perfectly its not worth doing at all” excuse omnis have

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Go banana!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

As someone who‘s allergic to an ungodly amount of vegetable oils, fruit and gluten: no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Weird how every time veganism comes up everyone is suddenly deathly allergic to anything that doesn’t scream when it dies

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

…every time veganism comes up…

You mean every time that a vegan uses whatever tenuous link to the current topic they can imagine exists to bring up veganism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Vegans complaining about other people needlessly injecting themselves into conversations is peak copium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m deathly allergic to evangelism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I really wish alpha gal allergy was more prevalent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Stuff from milk, mushrooms and eggs don’t scream, so do a lot of salads and olive oil, even rice is silent.

And don’t start with those industrial cows that only get to live because of the milk. That stuff tastes like shit. Same with those chickens in cages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Some people can also just have health issues, but i get your point

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Plants scream when they die, we just don’t notice it. They release all sorts of pheromone type chemicals that warn other plants that there is danger. That’s definitely a scream.

I’m not saying eating meat is better, I’m just saying that seemingly the only truly ethical things to eat are raw minerals, and I don’t believe that’s possible, other than salt. Salt seems to be the only tasty rock.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Comic Strips

!comicstrips@lemmy.world

Create post

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

  • The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author’s website, for instance).
  • The comic must be a complete story.
  • If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
  • You may post comics from others or your own.
  • If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
  • The comic can be in any language, but if it’s not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post’s ‘body’ field (note: you don’t need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
  • Politeness.
  • Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

Community stats

  • 9.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 50K

    Comments

Community moderators