You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
163 points

Fucking South Carolina. How the shit is something that doesn’t conceal your face a mask??

permalink
report
reply
227 points

Because it’s selectively enforced in order to oppress Black people

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

This is without exaggeration the reasoning behind like 90% of South Carolina’s policies. Absolute shithole state, my heart goes out to people whose communities are there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-92 points

He probably got charged because he pissed off a cop. Maybe try not cursing at them while they are trying to break up a fight that you are not even a part of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Nah.

How about cops stop being such pieces of shit instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

“Just give up your right to free speech because cops can’t be trusted to respect your constitutional rights” is practical advice, but it’s not exactly saying anything good about cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Fuck off, I’m allowed to say what I want and fucking contempt of cop is not actually a law anywhere.

Cops should not have a pass but this law is beyond fucking stupid and clearly only put into place because the tough right wing are clearly special snow flakes that cannot anything they don’t agree with.

I actually just realized the right is always calling the left “snowflakes and weak” when the left is offended by the rights desire to force their morals on us. In reality the left does what the right is refusing to do, be tolerant.

Turns out every accusation is really an admission from the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Oh no! How dare he fucking swear at a cop?! Clearly, this fucking shit could not be allowed to fucking stand.

How about the cop grow the fuck up and not go off on a fucking immature power trip just because a teenager swore at him?

Fuck that pig.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Why the fuck are you defending cops persecuting people for swearing at them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

How do you say that and not get upset at the cop for clear abuse of power in that hypothetical? The cop is older, has training

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

It’s a hood. I thought southerners liked hoods considering all the defending they do of the Klan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Maybe if the hood had been white. Or most definitely his skin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The sad thing is, according to the article, this was originally an anti-Klan law. And now it’s being used to selectively and falsely prosecute black kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Read and you won’t have to ask. It’s even in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

When asked how common this charge is, Husted said she doesn’t know anyone who has represented someone on this type of charge and could hardly find a page of recent arrests on the public index.

“I’m shocked, as an attorney, I’d never heard of that kind of charge before. I immediately wanted to help because it’s just so ridiculous that someone would be charged with something like that,” Husted said.

Sounds like blatant selective enforcement of a law that only applies to people who commit contempt of cop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

Well, it looks like you can pull it up over your face. He just has it pulled down.

Edit: I’m not even defending mask laws. I don’t see how they could possibly be constitutional and disagree with them fundamentally. I just think this guy was clearly wearing something that covers his face. It’s a mask that he uses to cover his face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

So kind of like any T-shirt, sweatshirt, or a scarf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Or napkin, towel, and blanket!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Would be real fun to see them twist themselves into pretzels banning all clothing that can cover a face without running afoul of their own pathological fear of human mammary glands 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I just think this guy was clearly wearing something that covers his face.

Oh no, somebody call the police /s

Oh wait, I guess they did. I guess he’s lucky he wasn’t shot…

(I didn’t downvote you, I assume you’re playing devil’s advocate or the like)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A bunch of people were saying that it wasn’t even a mask, but it obviously is. His mom even said that he wears one to cover some scars he is embarrassed about. I was just pointing that out.

Also I don’t think mask wearing should be illegal. I think it’s a big government over reach. Maybe I’d be fine with an additional penalty for wearing a mask while committing a crime, or something like that, if you really wanted to go after masked people. No way you should be able to be arrested for that. I don’t think it would even hold up to court challenges as a viable law. I am confident that we will see these laws overturned.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments