You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
183 points
*

Wondered where I remembered him from, it was this juxtaposition of photos:

Additional context: around the same time Governor Walz (upper) was signing a bill for guaranteed school lunches the Governer of Arkansas (lower) was signing a bill rolling back protections on child labor.

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/gov-tim-walz-signs-universal-school-meals-bill-into-law/

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162531885/arkansas-child-labor-law-under-16-years-old-sarah-huckabee-sanders

permalink
report
reply
70 points

That photo of him! Every person in it is so genuinely happy! Brought tears to my eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Hot Damn! The DNC didn’t fuck up so fucking happy to be wrong and she didn’t pick Shapiro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I’m shocked, honestly. Shapiro is the canonical post-Clinton Democrat, all the consent manufacturers were clearly pulling for him.

As one of the leftmost members of the D voting coalition its a strange feeling to not be getting continuously shat upon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Whoa whoa whoa. So Harris is laffin, and Walz is smilin??? Too much happiness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I know I’m well into auntie territory because I had the same reaction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Those poor kids going to work in the mines in the lower pic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The one kid totally has “wtf?” face going on. I feel bad for those kids. Their parents are all probably total scum bags.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They want to be at home playing Roblox, but their parents made them wear ties and have their hair slicked into place. All to support a bill where they’re going to be playing less Roblox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would also point out, not to give Huckabee any credit, but the silver lining of that bill might allow kids trying to gain freedom from abusive homes, permitting them to go job hunting on their own (although 14/15 seems super young regardless - they couldn’t without someone signing off otherwise). The downsides is parents forcing kids to go to work in dangerous jobs (to your point).

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

freedom from abusive homes, permitting them to go job hunting on their own

While i see what you’re saying, i think the lede is buried. the important change in law is here:

The state also no longer has to verify the age of those under 16 before they take a job.

The state isn’t even checking how old these children are. And the younger a kid is, the more easily they are exploited. And the power dynamic between boss and kiddo is worse. All this will do is make kids easy to exploit

I don’t have to tell y’all, right? How many hours got stolen from you as kids? Or what kind of crap did you put up with before you knew better?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Without laws letting child workers maintain their own bank account in their own name without parents being co owners allowed to drain it at any time, children working become money pinatas for abusive parents.

I say this as someone who would have benefitted from being independent earlier. My uncle did have me work at 14, and when I went to the bank I found he had stolen every penny, and because I was a minor I had no legal recourse to get it back.

A few years later the courts emancipated me, but it didn’t return the money he had stolen. Mind you, he was not working at the time himself and he got a few hundred from the state a month to care for me, and he spent what he stole on computer parts so he could game.

Children working only is in the child’s benefit if there are ironclad laws allowing them to keep their money, and right now there is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

Gov. Tim Walz signs universal school meals bill into law

vs

Arkansas Gov. Sanders signs a law that makes it easier to employ children

I literally laughed out loud when I read the second headline. The kids faces says it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Here is a suggested edit for you, just use this image:

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Is he in the Sarah Huckabee photo? I don’t recognize him if he is. That article doesn’t even mention him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

No he isn’t, it’s comparing the two, one is Walz (D) signing a law to bring free lunches for school children in his state, the other is sarah huckabee ® signing a law to claw back child labor laws in her state

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*

I’m not really sure why that would be relevant in this context. Was Huckabee running for VP? Why include her?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments