Has anyone else noticed how prevalent Hexbear posters have suddenly become? Maybe sometime last week I noticed nearly every political post had at least one long thread of Hexbear users that do nothing but repeat CCP talking points while waving anyway anything even remotely reliable as Western propaganda. That or getting all excited about trolled libs. The way they tell it, you’d think everything from DW, to Fox, to Propublica, to straight up AP News articles, are all written by the same people.

Not to mention, their info on the Fediverse observer is either straight up wrong or there’s some serious botting going on. According to that, the instance is less than a month old, yet somehow they already have one of the largest, most active userbases, along with far and away the most comments of any instance.

Seems to me like Lemmygrad on steroids. Considering we defederated from them, seems like a no-brainer to block Hexbear as well.

So glad this thread could become such a perfect microcosm of why we need to defederate.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
77 points
-1 points

Hey, what about this tangentially-connected thing from 70 years ago?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Has anything changed in 70 years? The legacy of the suppression of the left wing in the United States is still with us today!

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

from 70 years ago?

lmaoooooo

permalink
report
parent
reply

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.

Hey America (and Canada, UK, Australia, etc.), how ya doing?

✅ Rejection of political plurality (See: Range of acceptable thought among mainstream political parties; Also, consider some self-reflection)

✅ Strong central power to preserve the political status quo (See: Mainstream media apparatus, spanning news, movies, tv, etc.)

✅ Reductions in the rule of law (See: Absolute failure to hold politicians or corporations accountable)

✅ Reductions in the separation of powers (See: Politicians funded by and catering to corporate interests)

✅ Reductions in democratic Voting (See again: Politicians funded by and catering to corporate interests + absolute failure to hold politicians accountable; Also see: Rampant gerrymandering, erosion of voters’ right, zero democracy in the workplace or outside of political elections)

permalink
report
parent
reply

No see you’re allowed to decide if the guy with the blue tie or the guy with the red tie is your representative (uh… if you live in one of the handful of districts that are competitive anyway) so that means it cant be authoritarian. God I love our illusion of democracy. It makes me feel so nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

So we have to pretend political plurality is inherently and self evidently good now?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hey! The guy in the red tie and the guy in the blue tie disagree slightly on one issue! The ability to decide between them is true freedom!

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

rejectetion of political plurality

use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo

reductions in the rule of law

authoritarianism is characterized by reductions in the rule of law?? what???

separation of powers

and Democratic voting

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

authoritarianism is characterized by reductions in the rule of law?? what???

Here, “rule of law” means roughly “all people are equal before the law” (that is, you don’t have a group of people who are above it).

Emojis unrelated

permalink
report
parent
reply

Using wikipedia as a reference for political ideology is like asking W Bush which countries are good and bad

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wonder who made that definition.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I didn’t say everything is authoritarian, I specifically stated your politics as being authoritarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

wanna explain how that definition applies to us??? it’s really easy to just point at a wikipedia article but you’re not really proving anything by just stating an extremely loaded definition.

permalink
report
parent
reply

main

!main@midwest.social

Create post

Default community for midwest.social. Post questions about the instance or questions you want to ask other users here.

Community stats

  • 19

    Monthly active users

  • 118

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments

Community moderators