You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

Yes, I said from the start that it might not be moral.

But that’s exactly the point: companies sell movies to theaters, and then those theaters sell tickets to each viewer. That’s the license they each agreed to. A theater buying a movie off Amazon and then selling tickets to everyone who watched it would probably make some people upset, and would very clearly be illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Talk about mental gymnastics.

You cant sell a limited time license. That is rent, plain and simple. If you pay 3 years rent at once or monthly, its still rent.

If you pay for something and have to give it back, you dont actually become the „owner“.

And thats why people say if buying isnt owning, piracy isnt theft, plain and simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Renting generally refers to physical goods, with the following property: when it’s being used by one party, it’s unavailable to everyone else.

For intellectual property, things that can be used by N people without interference between them, the term limited license is correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Its still manipulative to call it „selling“ or „owning“.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 99K

    Comments