Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond — a Republican — is bucking his own party in a new lawsuit aimed at preventing what would be the first publicly funded religious school in America from opening.

On Friday, Drummond filed the suit in Oklahoma Supreme Court, challenging the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board’s 3-2 decision in June to grant a contract to open St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual Charter School. According to PBS, Drummond warned that the establishment of St. Isidore, which is sponsored by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, would lead to the floodgates opening for religious groups of all stripes to make bids for public funding for schools of their own.

“Make no mistake, if the Catholic Church were permitted to have a public virtual charter school, a reckoning will follow in which this state will be faced with the unprecedented quandary of processing requests to directly fund all petitioning sectarian groups,” the lawsuit read.

139 points

Oh wow! There’s a unicorn in the Republican party! It appears that a modern Republican actually had the inclination to think of “what would happen next?”, BEFORE implementing said thing. Whew.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

The Church of Satan must be opening a school using the same method.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

CoS keeps to themselves. The Satanic Temple are the activists. They’re the ones that do the After School Satan Clubs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Call The Satanic Temple today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

They’re on the case

Lucien Greaves, the cofounder and spokesperson for The Satanic Temple, says his organization may submit its own application if the decision stands.

“We’ll consider opening an alternative school if the courts uphold a flagrantly self-serving & uneducated, utterly unqualified & ignorant school board’s vote to overturn the constitution,” Greaves tweeted.

Rajan Zed, who is President of Universal Society of Hinduism, said the board should now welcome other religious groups like Buddhists, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Jews, Sikhs, and Bahai’s when they present their applications in the future.

Zed says he has written to the board to apply for a Hindu virtual charter school but has not received a response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Or a Muslim one

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I hope so. Me and my wife are members. Thank goodness they are around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Unfortunately they weren’t concerned about public money used for religion.

They were concerned that those other religions expect equal treatment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Apparently we are a smart AG. To bad our governor and the guy in charge of education both fought to open this school. Glad the AG is trying to stop it. But wonder how the courts will rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Religion aside, opening the floodgates in this way just doesn’t make sense. Our public schools are already underfunded. Why would they want to use the same pool of money to fund even more schools?

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Because the point isn’t to fund schools. It’s to create a Christian Theocracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s the top priority and long term goal. Until they can get that, they’ll settle for an undereducated public since ignorance is the best friend of the preacher…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Alberta, Canada, has a separate publicly funded catholic school system. They bus kids to our main government building every year for the big anti-abortion rally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Jesus Christ this is disgusting. What’s next, livestreams of MAGA rallies in class?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is this something you can opt out of? As in if an atheist doesn’t want their tax money going to it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

To make them worse. How else is the Republican party going to grow in the future?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It is a way to segregate the “worthy” from the rest (or vice versa I guess depending on if your “worthy” or not).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Conservatives have been trying to kill public schools since integration was forced on them. Notice that this was a “virtual” school?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Interesting tidbit: in the Netherlands all schools are publicly funded, including religious ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well yeah. No one wants to get on Thor’s bad side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Drummond warned that the establishment of St. Isidore, which is sponsored by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, would lead to the floodgates opening for religious groups of all stripes to make bids for public funding for schools of their own.

Emphasis mine.

It isn’t that he doesn’t want a Catholic school to be publicly funded. He is worried that other religious groups (subtext: Muslims) will try to get the same funding.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

Lol, he didn’t just imply it, he outright went there in a press conference:

"Today, Oklahomans are being compelled to fund Catholicism. Because of the legal precedent created by the Board’s actions, tomorrow we may be forced to fund radical Muslim teachings like Sharia law. In fact, Governor Stitt has already indicated that he would welcome a Muslim charter school funded by our tax dollars. That is a gross violation of our religious liberty. As the defender of Oklahoma’s religious freedoms, I am prepared to litigate this issue to the United States Supreme Court if that’s what is required to protect our Constitutional rights.” - Press release

The broken analog clock is still right twice a day?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

While he could have said it differently and with a lot more cultural sensitivity, he’s correct.

If you allow religion in our schools, you are opening up Pandora box. Flying spaghetti monster deserves a space too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

For sure. It just amuses me that someone can find the shittiest possible ways to argue for the right outcome, and that the media can just overlook the shitty parts because they (rightly) agree with that outcome.

I think it’s also worth noting the phrasing is very deliberate - he reportedly has political aspirations and existing beef with the Senator, so he’s appealing to his potential base too. He mentions Sharia later at least once more and makes sure to let people know he thinks kids should be reading Bibles with their family. It’s all filthy and deliberate politics, and it’s clearly the right thing to do, bizarrely twisted into… this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

As the defender of religious freedoms… [we are ok with catholicism but not islam]

This is beyond parody.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re not ok with Catholics either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or more likely, a satanic temple school 👹

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Me thinks someone is preparing to run for governor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To be fair, that’s the argument that’s most likely to resonate with a lot of Oklahoma voters

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, but to be even more fair, it being effective doesn’t excuse appeals to bigotry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How tf is a muslim school a blatant violation of christian religious freedom? It’s a violation of their ability to be bigots

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Ah, so it’s the old Catholics vs Protestants again.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’ll probably end up being the Catholics vs. the Satanic Temple

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I was about to ask when the Satanists were showing up. I love those guys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

More like he knows Lucian Grieves of the Satanic Temple has already prefilled a letter with his lawyer friend to have St. Lucifer’s Preparatory Academy financed by Oklahoma state funds. Just waiting for the Catholic funding to be upheld and the letter gets mailed. Along with affidavit from a local Oklahoma Satanist who is absolutely enthusiastic about having their child schooled at St. Lucifers.

Like protestant vs Catholic is least of their problems. They have to finance a Wiccan Coven school, Muslim masrada, scientologist school, a norse Viking academy and so on.

Since as the rule goes: can’t start making rulings on which religions are in and which are out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt — himself a Republican who endorsed then-incumbent Attorney General John O'Connor in Oklahoma's 2022 Republican primary — reportedly dismissed Drummond's lawsuit as a "political stunt."

"AG Drummond seems to lack any firm grasp on the constitutional principle of religious freedom and masks his disdain for the Catholics’ pursuit by obsessing over non-existent schools that don’t neatly align with his religious preference," Stitt said.

Project much?

permalink
report
reply
19 points

The “constitutional principle of religious freedom” says there shall be no official state religion. So…when the state funds something religious, what does that sound like to them

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They probably think that it’s freedom of choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments