209 points

Well, this should be no surprise.

She’s been bending over backwards for Trump since day one, and she’s spent this entire time dragging her feet on even the most basic of issues. She created delay after delay, and is now using the delay she created as the justification for granting the postponement that Trump has been seeking all along.

“Mid November.” What a god damned coincidence. The rotting corpse of Hellen Keller could have seen right through that load of bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

At this point I’m convinced she’s literally in communication with his team or people once removed. This is the most slam dunk case ever. Did he have these documents? Yes. Was he allowed to? No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh man if the prosecution brought evidence of that to the DoJ things would get spicy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Is there anyway they can throw her out or do something about this cunts corruption? Seriously we going allow her to keep this from proceeding until she is sure he is President and can pardon himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Yes, they can appeal to the 11th circuit to have her removed. That’s not an easy thing to do though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s such an open and shut case, he may still be convicted with all the help in the world. If that happens he is in a bad position to effectively argue that she was biased against him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And is there any mechanism in place for her removal as a judge, just based on overall being unfit for the role?

permalink
report
parent
reply
132 points

That’s cause cannon is corrupt

permalink
report
reply
138 points

I like how they say it needs to be delayed because he’s campaigning. Fuck that. Crimes come first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Yeah, sorry I won’t be able to pay that speeding ticket right now, I’m campaigning.

Oh, when will I be done? I suppose when the Galactic Council finally holds the vote to appoint me Supreme Galactic Overlord. Until then!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

NO FAIR, THAT’S THE POSITION I WANTED!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Settle down there, Palpatine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

My guess is she’ll grant a delay but won’t cite his campaigning because she knows that won’t fly with appellate judges.

She’ll have enough other bullshit justifications to give Trump what he wants and get her kickback.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

My understanding is that scheduling delays are not appealable, at least not by the prosecution. Judges have the right to set their own schedules.

She just doesn’t want to look blatantly corrupt if and when anything does go to appeal though. She’s doing her best to postpone this trial indefinitely while still maintaining something resembling plausible impartiality. I’m sure that when “Mid November 2024” comes around, she’ll suddenly have another reason to delay because Trump will then be appealing the results of the election about 47 times, and heaven forbid her case interfere with that and after all that he’s gonna need more time to prepare. So, January 2026 then? What? He’ll be too old and suffering from dementia and therefore isn’t competent to stand trial, even though he still appears on TV every day? Darn. I guess she’ll just have to postpone this trial indefinitely. It’s too bad…the people deserved to hear the truth, but whatever was she to do? The situation was completely unavoidable!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points
*

Without reading the article, I’m betting it’s Judge Cannon.

Edit: yup

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

It’s absofuckinglutley infuriating that this can be the case. It was the same with me too. Didn’t even have to open the article to know it was that fucking stooge.

How the hell can we pretend we have a fair judicial system when we can call how a judge will act simply by knowing who she is… Not knowing the facts of the case as they don’t matter, but simply knowing it’s “her” gives us all the information we need to know she’s going to fight for Trump however she can…

Impartial my ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

the Trump team asking Cannon to postpone the trial “until at least mid-November 2024.”

How terribly convenient …

about a month ago, Trump’s team wanted thousands of pages of evidence it already had from the investigation given to them again, so that they could see where copies of classified documents in a box stored at Mar-a-Lago may have existed among other documents, to “ascertain where the pages had been stored,” prosecutors said.

It’s not up to the prosecutors to make up for Trump’s lawyers’ lack of organization.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

It’s rank bullshit, yes.

This is the same judge that allowed a special master, and that was reversed by the 3 judge appeals panel with scathing commentary.

Her head is so far up trump’s ass the hamberders taste mostly fresh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Of course she did. We knew as soon as this judge was assigned the case that she was going to try to wreck it, like she did the last one.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 413K

    Comments